Determining Control Limits from a desired Cpk

K

kb103

#1
Good evening everyone, I'm new to stats/process control but I'm trying to gain a better understanding so I can improve some of the processes I'm responsible for.

I have two sets of data, 20 samples of a 'good' part and 20 samples of a 'bad' part. I want control limits that will give me a Cpk of 1.33. Currently I'm adjusting my control limits in to Minitab, generating charts, observing the Cpk, then readjusting limits until I achieve the desired index.

Is there a way in Minitab to enter my sample values, desired Cpk, and have MiniTab generate the limits for me? Seems like I'm working backwards at the moment, thanks for your help.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#2
I'm afraid it doesn't work like that. The process variation drives both the control limits and the capability. If you establish the control limits as you suggest, they will not match the process variation. Judging from your question, I would expect the control limits to be too tight for the process, and you will react to a lot of false alarms.
 

Kales Veggie

People: The Vital Few
#3
Good evening everyone, I'm new to stats/process control but I'm trying to gain a better understanding so I can improve some of the processes I'm responsible for.

I have two sets of data, 20 samples of a 'good' part and 20 samples of a 'bad' part. I want control limits that will give me a Cpk of 1.33. Currently I'm adjusting my control limits in to Minitab, generating charts, observing the Cpk, then readjusting limits until I achieve the desired index.

Is there a way in Minitab to enter my sample values, desired Cpk, and have MiniTab generate the limits for me? Seems like I'm working backwards at the moment, thanks for your help.
You should approach it differently.

CpK is determined by the tolerance range and the process variation.

Control limits are determined by the process variation and a constant, depending on sample size.

So, CpK and control limits are both dependent on the process variation.

So, you have to determine the process variation. This is often done through a process capability study (run at least 30 piece, 125 is best), measure and chart in production sequence and analyze.

(also CpK is only valid if the process characteristic has a normal distribution)
 
K

kb103

#4
Thank you Miner and Kales Veggie, that really helps. So let me ask you this. Typically when we set up an inspection or a process we collect 20-30 samples of good and bad parts, look at the numbers from the process (critical to quality), then put control limits around the numbers. This is usually a judgement call with no real calculated method. In your opinion what is the best way to determine control limits in this scenario?
 

Kales Veggie

People: The Vital Few
#5
Thank you Miner and Kales Veggie, that really helps. So let me ask you this. Typically when we set up an inspection or a process we collect 20-30 samples of good and bad parts, look at the numbers from the process (critical to quality), then put control limits around the numbers. This is usually a judgement call with no real calculated method. In your opinion what is the best way to determine control limits in this scenario?
No, you should manufacture the parts, collect all parts sequentially (probably number them) from the process, no adjustments to the controls, measure the characteristic(s) and plot them and perform your analysis.

Do not select good and bad parts.
 
K

kb103

#6
Kales Veggie:

Thank you for the response. There are times when my 'good' parts test in very close to my 'bad' parts. For example, here are some light intensity values taken from a camera I use to inspect colors. The parts have very similar colors:

Code:
Good:
2.42
2.17
2.34
2.25
2.37
2.48
2.45
2.18
2.31
2.37
2.01
1.91
2.13
1.78
2.23
1.83
2.13
2.87
2.36
2.18
Code:
Bad:
4.92
4.08
4.22
4.34
3.92
4.89
2.90
5.24
3.95
4.92
4.35
5.08
4.16
5.13
5.40
3.90
3.60
3.33
5.02
4.08
Had I used my I-MR chart to determine a UCL of 2.916 (according to minitab) I'd have exposed myself to risk - without testing the 'bad' parts I'd have no idea my process was not in control.

Am I making sense or completely off base? :)

Thanks again for your insight I really appreciate it.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#7
Kales Veggie:

Thank you for the response. There are times when my 'good' parts test in very close to my 'bad' parts. For example, here are some light intensity values taken from a camera I use to inspect colors. The parts have very similar colors:

Code:
Good:
2.42
2.17
2.34
2.25
2.37
2.48
2.45
2.18
2.31
2.37
2.01
1.91
2.13
1.78
2.23
1.83
2.13
2.87
2.36
2.18
Code:
Bad:
4.92
4.08
4.22
4.34
3.92
4.89
2.90
5.24
3.95
4.92
4.35
5.08
4.16
5.13
5.40
3.90
3.60
3.33
5.02
4.08
Had I used my I-MR chart to determine a UCL of 2.916 (according to minitab) I'd have exposed myself to risk - without testing the 'bad' parts I'd have no idea my process was not in control.

Am I making sense or completely off base? :)

Thanks again for your insight I really appreciate it.
It's hard to tell exactly what you're doing, or trying to accomplish. As Kales and Miner have suggested, if you want to do SPC such that you can calculate Cpk, you need to (a) verify your measurement system; (b) select samples from production in chronological order, with aggregate number of samples being statistically significant; (c) verify that your process is statistically stable and (d) study the results to determine whether or not the process is capable of doing what you need for it to do.

Contrary to popular belief, selecting a sample of parts from a manufactured lot and charting the measurements and doing a Cpk calculation is not a good or even sensible way to understand process capability. Cpk, even when done correctly, is a mostly useless statistic.

Figure out what you need (the specification limits), then see if your production process is capable of achieving it.
 

rickpaul01

Involved in HankyPanky
#8
Am I making sense or completely off base? :)

Thanks again for your insight I really appreciate it.
IMHO I think you are completely off base.
If I understand correctly: You are making a bunch of parts. Then you are sorting them into "good" and "bad". Then you are testing each part to determine the numberical value. Then applying the rules for a normal distribution to the two different populations.
Is this correct?
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
You are gettting good advice. taking 'good' and 'bad' parts is a stratified sample and calculating anything statistical or even a 'judgment' call on some type of 'control limit' will not provide useful information - in fact it can be horribly misleading.

perhaps the best approach is to start from the beginning: what are trying to accomplish? adn I,m not askign about what calculations you want to make but you want to do with the results of the calculations...
 
M

Mr.Happy

#10
I have an additional question about Cpk value:
how can I calculate from the Cpk value the amount of parts that I have to check in production to prevent any rejected parts.
In this case dimension 46 +0 / -0,1 mmm with a Cpk (30 parts) of 0,78 ?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Determining Critical Control Points (CCP's) in Food Safety Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 4
H Document Control Defined? Determining what documents must be controlled ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
H Critical Processes - Determining what processes on the Control Plan are critical FMEA and Control Plans 6
G Determining Sample Size and Frequency for Features on Control Plans FMEA and Control Plans 8
S Determining the requirements for the products and services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
Q Determining Adverse Effects of Corrective/Preventive Actions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Determining sample sizes for PQ Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
M Determining if an Insulin Pen Testing Machine is a Medical Device? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M Determining a tolerance value for Measuring devices in-house inspection General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 12
D Determining the the maximum number of reprocessing cycles of attachments CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
R Determining Uncertainty from Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
A IATF 16949 4.3.1 - Determining the scope of the quality management system - supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
D ISO 9001:2015 4.3 Determining the Scope of the QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J Determining SPC tolerance Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 21
B Determining SAT Offsets vs TUS Offsets per SAE AMS 2750E AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
B Determining sample size for device sterility Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
D Determining of sample size for 'Operational Qualification' AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 5
R Question on determining defective units - I am not recording fixture to part rejected Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
S Clause 8.2.2 Determining the requirements for products and services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
D Determining Calibration Frequency schedule for items used in production Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
C Determining if Maintenance Contractor is an External Service subject to ISO 9001 Clause 8.4 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 43
S AS9100D PEAR - Examples for organization's method for determining process results? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
I Determining Calibration Tolerance of a Measurement Device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J ISO 17025 Documented Procedure for 6.2.5 - Determining competency ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
V Determining FDA 820 (registration) vs ISO 13485 - Supplier gives us the kit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
J ISO 9001 8.4.1 - Determining controls applied to externally provided processes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
E Determining what is good and what is bad can be subjective - when is it a quality issue? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
F Determining what type of scrap to include in my internal PPM calculation Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 5
M Determining number of employees within the "Scope" of the QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
A Determining the Scope of the QMS during Stage 1? Registrars and Notified Bodies 11
W Minor Audit Nonconformance Against Determining the scope of QMS IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
D Determining Critical Components for conformity with IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 21
Q ISO 9001, section 4.3 Determining the scope of our QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
R Determining Sample Size for Medical Device Component Validation Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
A What does 8.2.2.1, Determining the requirements related to products and services,mean IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
A Determining Retention Period for Medical Device QMS documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
S Surveillance Sampling Test - Determining Sample Size Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
F ISO 9001:2015 4.3 - Determining the scope of the quality management system ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
B Standards Needed In House - Determining what standards are applicable Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
W Determining Medical Device Classification in Mexico Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 5
K Determining Effect of Failure without a DFMEA (Design FMEA) FMEA and Control Plans 1
W Determining the Status and Importance of the Processes and Areas to be Audited Internal Auditing 7
T Determining Customer Requirements for the US Postal Service (USPS) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
Crimpshrine13 Rules of achieving and maintaining IATF recognition - Determining audit days IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
R Developing procedure for Determining Company's Context And Interested Parties ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 53
W Determining Asset Life or Depreciation Life for M&TE General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
N Reason for determining no adverse effect on reworked product ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
N Procedure for determining pinhole position in condom Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
alonFAI Determining PCBA Xray Test Sampling Size Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
S Determining sample size for inspection to achieve x% confidence re defects Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom