Determining what is good and what is bad can be subjective - when is it a quality issue?

embedded

Involved In Discussions
We have a customer that is sending back product at a high rate of return (10%) reporting problems such that screws won't screw in. After looking at a couple RMAs as well as stock, mechanical engineering has determine there is no problem. More specifically these tapped holes are pretty small (4-40), and in inspecting stock the feedback was 5-6% of units in stock (different distribution but in the right ballpark as rate of return) won't screw in the first time, you hit a stopping point but after backing the screw out and trying again on the second or third attempt the screw goes in without issue. This seems odd to me and I can understand why the customer is sending back product, but I'm also not knowledgeable in this area. I've registered the customer complaint as an issue in our system and once we hear back from the customer we will close the issue out. Although, the explanation doesn't sound right to me I don't think there is anything further for me (quality manager) to do as both engineering management as well as sales manager (same person) is in agreement there is no issue. Is my thinking correct - close it out and move on?
 

Al Rosen

Leader
Super Moderator
We have a customer that is sending back product at a high rate of return (10%) reporting problems such that screws won't screw in. After looking at a couple RMAs as well as stock, mechanical engineering has determine there is no problem. More specifically these tapped holes are pretty small (4-40), and in inspecting stock the feedback was 5-6% of units in stock (different distribution but in the right ballpark as rate of return) won't screw in the first time, you hit a stopping point but after backing the screw out and trying again on the second or third attempt the screw goes in without issue. This seems odd to me and I can understand why the customer is sending back product, but I'm also not knowledgeable in this area. I've registered the customer complaint as an issue in our system and once we hear back from the customer we will close the issue out. Although, the explanation doesn't sound right to me I don't think there is anything further for me (quality manager) to do as both engineering management as well as sales manager (same person) is in agreement there is no issue. Is my thinking correct - close it out and move on?
The screw should screw in the first time. If you don't identify the cause, you will continue to have a high rate of return.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
If your customer is willing to try screwing each one a few times, then issue resolved. However, it really wasn't fixed so your company may want to dig a bit further.
 

AndyN

Moved On
you hit a stopping point but after backing the screw out and trying again on the second or third attempt the screw goes in without issue.
Into what? A calibrated gauge? If you can't trust the form of the threaded hole you're attempting to put the screw into, well, you're screwed.... I'd critically review your inspection of these screws FIRST.
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Leader
Admin
Try to find out how the customer is performing the task. The following is a real life case I had to deal with. My company made an engine mount for the bottom front of a Mazda 626 engine. The mount had two M12 studs with a zero chamfer. While it was easy to hold the part in one hand and thread the mating nut onto the stud, it was incredibly difficult to reach under the front bumper and up to the engine and do so without being able to see the stud. We had to redesign the stud to include a dog point chamfer. This solved the customers real problem, which was not really a threading issue, but was cross threading.
 

Al Rosen

Leader
Super Moderator
If your customer is willing to try screwing each one a few times, then issue resolved. However, it really wasn't fixed so your company may want to dig a bit further.
If I'm the customer, I wouldn't agree to that. The supplier can chase the holes before shipment.
 

embedded

Involved In Discussions
Thanks, you guys seem to have the same perspective I do(if a screw doesn't go in on the first attempt, try it a couple more times, that's normal). I'm going to wait to see if the customer pushes back, as I've been questioning our engineering team quite a bit on this, to the point that engineering is getting frustrated with me.
 

Al Rosen

Leader
Super Moderator
Thanks, you guys seem to have the same perspective I do(if a screw doesn't go in on the first attempt, try it a couple more times, that's normal).
I think you may have missed the point. It's not normal. Either your customer or you have an issue that should be investigated.
 

qualprod

Trusted Information Resource
We have a customer that is sending back product at a high rate of return (10%) reporting problems such that screws won't screw in. After looking at a couple RMAs as well as stock, mechanical engineering has determine there is no problem. More specifically these tapped holes are pretty small (4-40), and in inspecting stock the feedback was 5-6% of units in stock (different distribution but in the right ballpark as rate of return) won't screw in the first time, you hit a stopping point but after backing the screw out and trying again on the second or third attempt the screw goes in without issue. This seems odd to me and I can understand why the customer is sending back product, but I'm also not knowledgeable in this area. I've registered the customer complaint as an issue in our system and once we hear back from the customer we will close the issue out. Although, the explanation doesn't sound right to me I don't think there is anything further for me (quality manager) to do as both engineering management as well as sales manager (same person) is in agreement there is no issue. Is my thinking correct - close it out and move on?
Go un deep, which is the agreement between sales and customer? Is there an aql? Is there an allowable percentage of bad product?
 

optomist1

A Sea of Statistics
Super Moderator
When it comes to Quality, Performance, Compliance with Customer Requirements....it must be in writing and agreed to usually by Release Engineer, SQ, Purch and in some cases all the above...in a very crude form Quality is compliance or adherence to written and agreed to paramters, details, drawings...etc etc.,
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L Counting contractors for determining AS9100 audit days AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
Dazzur Difficulty in determining who should be addressing NCRs Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
L Determining effectiveness and efficiency Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 6
C Determining an as received OOT condition during calibration does not affect measurements taken prior to calibration. General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 16
C Need help in determining applicable clause for an audit finding (based on AS9120B) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Q Kap.4.3 Determining the scope ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
U Determining population defect rate from sample defect rate Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
T Determining FIPS 140-2 compliance in a medical device Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 2
W Strategy for determining which components from a system should be "ME EQUIPMENT" -- home healthcare environment IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
J Process Capability - Determining the process capability of certain equipment Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 6
S Determining Sample Size and Method Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 12
S Determining a device category according to the MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S Determining the requirements for the products and services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
Q Determining Adverse Effects of Corrective/Preventive Actions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Determining sample sizes for PQ Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
M Determining if an Insulin Pen Testing Machine is a Medical Device? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M Determining a tolerance value for Measuring devices in-house inspection General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 12
D Determining the the maximum number of reprocessing cycles of attachments CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
R Determining Uncertainty from Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
A IATF 16949 4.3.1 - Determining the scope of the quality management system - supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
D ISO 9001:2015 4.3 Determining the Scope of the QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J Determining SPC tolerance Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 21
B Determining SAT Offsets vs TUS Offsets per SAE AMS 2750E AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
B Determining sample size for device sterility Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
D Determining of sample size for 'Operational Qualification' AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 5
R Question on determining defective units - I am not recording fixture to part rejected Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
S Clause 8.2.2 Determining the requirements for products and services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
D Determining Calibration Frequency schedule for items used in production Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
C Determining if Maintenance Contractor is an External Service subject to ISO 9001 Clause 8.4 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 44
S AS9100D PEAR - Examples for organization's method for determining process results? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
I Determining Calibration Tolerance of a Measurement Device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J ISO 17025 Documented Procedure for 6.2.5 - Determining competency ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
V Determining FDA 820 (registration) vs ISO 13485 - Supplier gives us the kit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
J ISO 9001 8.4.1 - Determining controls applied to externally provided processes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
F Determining what type of scrap to include in my internal PPM calculation Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 5
M Determining number of employees within the "Scope" of the QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
A Determining the Scope of the QMS during Stage 1? Registrars and Notified Bodies 11
W Minor Audit Nonconformance Against Determining the scope of QMS IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
D Determining Critical Components for conformity with IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 21
Q ISO 9001, section 4.3 Determining the scope of our QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
R Determining Sample Size for Medical Device Component Validation Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
A What does 8.2.2.1, Determining the requirements related to products and services,mean IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
A Determining Retention Period for Medical Device QMS documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
S Surveillance Sampling Test - Determining Sample Size Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
F ISO 9001:2015 4.3 - Determining the scope of the quality management system ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
B Standards Needed In House - Determining what standards are applicable Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
W Determining Medical Device Classification in Mexico Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 5
K Determining Effect of Failure without a DFMEA (Design FMEA) FMEA and Control Plans 1
W Determining the Status and Importance of the Processes and Areas to be Audited Internal Auditing 7
T Determining Customer Requirements for the US Postal Service (USPS) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom