Development of Lean Supply in a Free-Issue Environment

E

encd3

#1
In my role as a research associate in a partnership between Warwick University and bodybuilding company JC Payne (UK),I've begun work towards and MSc in the subject area of distribution and supply networks.

Within this company, the manufacture of truck bodies is carried out in a relatively lean fashion; however significant disruptions are caused by the nature of the free-issue supply of key components such as chassis and tail lifts. Free-issuing of components by the customer restricts the ability of JCP to control production with frequent problems occurring when true product demand is not reflected in the pattern of free-issue supply. This results in periods of feast and famine.

Attached is a copy of my research proposal, any comments or advice would be greatly appreciated. I believe that the tools and techniques exist in lean theory to overcome this problem.

Regards,

Craig Davies
 

Attachments

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
encd3 said:
In my role as a research associate in a partnership between Warwick University and bodybuilding company JC Payne (UK),I've begun work towards and MSc in the subject area of distribution and supply networks.

Within this company, the manufacture of truck bodies is carried out in a relatively lean fashion; however significant disruptions are caused by the nature of the free-issue supply of key components such as chassis and tail lifts. Free-issuing of components by the customer restricts the ability of JCP to control production with frequent problems occurring when true product demand is not reflected in the pattern of free-issue supply. This results in periods of feast and famine.

Attached is a copy of my research proposal, any comments or advice would be greatly appreciated. I believe that the tools and techniques exist in lean theory to overcome this problem.

Regards,

Craig Davies
I'm still a bit confused by your use of the term "free issue" - which I interpret to mean "customer-supplied product" upon which the supplier performs a value-added process.

In my experience with this sort of activity
  • sending machined parts to heat treater or electroplater
    or
  • sending raw castings to a machinist for finishing to print
there were two primary factors which played into our choice of supplier to perform the activity:
  1. capability (the ability of the supplier to perform the activity to our specifications)
  2. capacity (the ability of the supplier to perform the activity within our time window of expectation)
In a Lean environment, there is always a process (sometimes more than one) which has a process time which is fixed and unchangeable. The only way to increase throughput of units per time period through this "bottleneck" process is to increase the number of persons or machines performing the activity.

Part of the planning for a finished product or assembly is to take the two factors (capability and capacity) into account for each component of the finished product. If one supplier does not have the capacity (for any number of reasons, including a corporate decision not to tie up a large portion of capacity into production for any single customer), then the buyer must increase the capacity by changing suppliers or adding more suppliers. Adding multiple suppliers brings another set of factors into play (uniformity and traceabililty of product - especially for critical components which can affect life, health, safety.)

Lean manufacturing environments aren't easy, but they are pretty to behold once they are operating effectively.

From the supplier's viewpoint:
When a customer does not have a steady flow of "customer-supplied" product to operate machinery at prime efficiency to perform the value added process, a supplier has two choices (with the connivance and acquiescence of the customer):
  1. Customer enters into a "take or pay" agreement to buy a fixed amount of production capacity from the supplier each month at two different prices: one price for actual use of the machines including labor and wear and tear on the machines and a second price equal to the lost profit for holding the machines and personnel idle for priority use on the customer's products (see comment below)
    or
  2. Customer agrees to buy a minimum amount of finished product per time period and agrees to pay a slight premium for peak flows exceeding that minimum in any given time period. The premium pays for getting priority use of the machines over any other customer of the supplier to meet the subject customer's demand. (see comment below)
Comments: In actual use, the supplier is willing to grant customer a concession to perform work on customer's product with priority over any other customer for two reasons: first, he is assured of a minimum income each time period which he can use to budget his operation and second, because he is compensated for delaying work for other customers to perform priority work on the subject customer's peak demand.

This does not violate the principle of Lean and may, in fact, enhance it, because the customer is justified in paying more to have a guaranteed supply per time period and increased demand in a given time period (resulting in higher payment to supplier per unit) can be offset by corresponding lower costs of overhead per item when more pieces are sold in that time period.
 
Last edited:
E

encd3

#3
Wes Bucey said:
I'm still a bit confused by your use of the term "free issue" - which I interpret to mean "customer-supplied product" upon which the supplier performs a value-added process.

In my experience with this sort of activity
  • sending machined parts to heat treater or electroplater
    or
  • sending raw castings to a machinist for finishing to print
there were two primary factors which played into our choice of supplier to perform the activity:
  1. capability (the ability of the supplier to perform the activity to our specifications)
  2. capacity (the ability of the supplier to perform the activity within our time window of expectation)
In a Lean environment, there is always a process (sometimes more than one) which has a process time which is fixed and unchangeable. The only way to increase throughput of units per time period through this "bottleneck" process is to increase the number of persons or machines performing the activity.

Part of the planning for a finished product or assembly is to take the two factors (capability and capacity) into account for each component of the finished product. If one supplier does not have the capacity (for any number of reasons, including a corporate decision not to tie up a large portion of capacity into production for any single customer), then the buyer must increase the capacity by changing suppliers or adding more suppliers. Adding multiple suppliers brings another set of factors into play (uniformity and traceabililty of product - especially for critical components which can affect life, health, safety.)

Lean manufacturing environments aren't easy, but they are pretty to behold once they are operating effectively.

From the supplier's viewpoint:
When a customer does not have a steady flow of "customer-supplied" product to operate machinery at prime efficiency to perform the value added process, a supplier has two choices (with the connivance and acquiescence of the customer):
  1. Customer enters into a "take or pay" agreement to buy a fixed amount of production capacity from the supplier each month at two different prices: one price for actual use of the machines including labor and wear and tear on the machines and a second price equal to the lost profit for holding the machines and personnel idle for priority use on the customer's products (see comment below)
    or
  2. Customer agrees to buy a minimum amount of finished product per time period and agrees to pay a slight premium for peak flows exceeding that minimum in any given time period. The premium pays for getting priority use of the machines over any other customer of the supplier to meet the subject customer's demand. (see comment below)
Comments: In actual use, the supplier is willing to grant customer a concession to perform work on customer's product with priority over any other customer for two reasons: first, he is assured of a minimum income each time period which he can use to budget his operation and second, because he is compensated for delaying work for other customers to perform priority work on the subject customer's peak demand.

This does not violate the principle of Lean and may, in fact, enhance it, because the customer is justified in paying more to have a guaranteed supply per time period and increased demand in a given time period (resulting in higher payment to supplier per unit) can be offset by corresponding lower costs of overhead per item when more pieces are sold in that time period.
Thanks Wes,

'Free-Issue' is a common term used in the UK (I think with a military history) used, as you suggested, to mean 'Customer Supplied Product'.

I'm experiencing a variation on the 'Free-Issue' situations you mention, where the truck chassis itself is Customer supplied to JCP, JCP's value is added (the truck body) and is then dispatched to the customer. The choices you suggest are ver interesting and I will give them further thought.

Regards,

Craig Davies
 
R

Ruis72

#4
Hi Craig,
Our directors introduced lean to our company about a year ago and we've had similar problems. We manufacture flexible printed circuit boards and it's quite common for some of our customers to supply us with free issue components ( resistors, transistors etc supplied free of charge ) for us to assemble to the printed circuit we have manufactured for them. We can neither change the supplier or add suppliers as the customer has specified we can only receive the components from them. However they can be frequently late, wrong or not supplied at all - there are times when we've part assembled a circuit, shipped to them and then had the circuit and remaining components shipped back to us for completion. Our stores people are unwilling to chase up the parts as they don't want to be hounding the customer. It's been like this for the 11 years I've been here so I'd be interested to see what you come up with!
 
E

encd3

#5
Thanks for your reply,

It seems the Electronics and Bodybuilding industries are united by a common problem.

I'll let you know what I come up with then. This is definitely a situation that is an accepted inefficiency... odd, when it is the customer who pays ultimately with the late delivery of their goods.

Craig
 
R

Ruis72

#6
Hi Craig,
I'm pretty new to quality but if there's any way i can help just get in touch

Elly

p.s good luck!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T Applying Lean Tools in Product Development Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
E Lean Product Development Material - Basics of Lean Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 5
J Are complaints applicable to development of medical devices? Customer Complaints 2
P Training department ideas and development for automotive supplier Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
N Example for design and development planning,input,output,review,verification,validation and transfer Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
Felony Melony Project Milestone Plan-Development to Mass Production APQP and PPAP 2
A 8.6 Release of products and services, 8.3 Design and development - evidence required ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
Sidney Vianna What ISO Standard (under the TC 176) supports the UN Sustainable Development Goal #10? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 11
A Design and development procedure for API Spec Q2 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
Z Iterative development and FDA change requests IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 12
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D ISO 13485 - 7.3.6 Design and development verification - Do most folks create a separate SOP? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Clinical Development Plan - Advice Requested EU Medical Device Regulations 11
silentmonkey Are risks in supply chain and development activities within scope of MDD? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M QA/RA Professional Development Suggestions Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
DuncanGibbons Resources for aiding in procedure, work instruction and manufacturing plan development and management AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
L Design & Development of a SERVICE Service Industry Specific Topics 13
T Design Control Procedures later in the Development Process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
K Old medical devices -> 7.3.7. Design and development validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
M Design Development MDR Design and Development of Products and Processes 0
O How can I justify excluding the R&D group and the design and development clause? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Ajit Basrur ISO 22379 for citywide events now in development General Information Resources 1
D CE Marking Requirements MDD & MDR - new product development covered under same scope EU Medical Device Regulations 1
G Strategy for IEC62304 implementation half way into the software development process IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 9
M Informational EU – Ongoing Guidance development within MDCG Subgroups Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
F Software development plan for SW update IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
C IATF 16949 8.3 Exclusion - Manufacturing process design and development IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Software Development Company - Who would own the whole process and the certification afterwards? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
A Design and development of products and services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
O Software development plan : development methods IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
S ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 - Design & Development for training course center ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
S ISO 9001:2015 & ISO 14001:2015 - I need a format for Design & Development planning ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
K Templates for software development quality audit Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
DuncanGibbons Are there aerospace standards for the development and manufacture of euipment and tools? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
L AS9100 and Agile development processes AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
D Electrical Safety During Medical Device Development IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
S How to consider the relevant standards during development of ISO13482:2016 for IVD manufacturing Blood grouping Other Medical Device Related Standards 6
D Medical device development - Custom test equipment ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Informational US FDA – Device Shortages Update: Challenges to encourage the development of new approaches to device sterilization Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
AlienraverX Design and Development Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
S Do we need to validate Software used in Drug discovery and development process? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
I QMS documents required at each stage of Software development IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5
V Who should define and own the Design and Development Plan and how to maintain the updates and revisions. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Development of 2xMOPP galvanic isolator for USB-connected device IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 9
K Design and Development Exclusion Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
V Exclusion of 'Design and Development' from scope of certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
H Supplier Development - Distributors only? The new GM Standards IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
cscalise Determination of CPD (Continuing Professional Development) hours for a training course Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
XRAY_3121 Design and Development Requirement - MDSAP Audit Finding Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom