Device functionality over service life - Objective evidence required?

david316

Involved In Discussions
#1
Hello,

If a medical device has key performance attributes is there any requirement that the manufacturer must prove the device is capable of meeting said performance limits throughout the devices service life? My understanding is that a manufacturer must prove that essential performance and basic safety must be maintained over the service life but I am unsure about other performance limits (e.g. limits documented in the manual) which are narrower than the essential performance limits?

e.g.
Manual states oxygen is controlled to +/- 1 lpm but essential performance is determined to be +/- 5 lpm.

Thanks for any guidance.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

indubioush

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
Often times this type of testing is dictated by the standard that is specific to that type of medical device. Is there a standard that is specific to your type of device?
 

david316

Involved In Discussions
#3
The general standard IEC 60601-1 only states the the expected service must be specified by the manufacturer and that during this time the device must remain safe (i.e. essential performance and basic safety is maintained). The particular standard then clarifies the essential performance requirements. There is nothing I can find that covers off whether a manufacturer needs to prove a device performs to its stated specifications (which may be tighter/different to the essential performance limits) over the service life.
 

david316

Involved In Discussions
#5
So if via the risk assessment you document that there are no unacceptable risks related to reliability and that the residual risk is acceptable you don't need to prove the product functions as intended over the service life?
 

indubioush

Quite Involved in Discussions
#7
There is not enough information to delve in fully. We don't know what type of device you have; we don't know all the product requirements; we don't know if you plan on servicing your device, etc. If you are the manufacturer, you are in the best position to determine what testing needs to be done to ensure device reliability and safety.
 

david316

Involved In Discussions
#8
I guess I should have asked if there are any regulations or standards that require that a manufacturer prove that an electrical medical device performs as intended over it's service life. My understanding is 60601-1 requires a manufacturer to state the devices service life over which essential performance and basic safety is expected to be maintained. I would expect accelerated life testing to prove this. But as far as I know there is no requirement to prove a medical device operates as per it's specs with accelerated life testing or that it even needs to be justified. You need to conduct risk management as per 14971 and identify any risks associated with the device which would include the device falling to operate within its spec and make the risks acceptable. But this does not mandate that testing must be conducted to prove a device performs as intended over it's life. Servicable or not.

So the questions is...is it acceptable to prove as per 60601-1 that a medical device maintains essential performance and basic safety over it's service life as well as conducting risk management as per 14971 or are there regulations or expectations from regulatory bodies that additional testing be conducted?
 

Tidge

Trusted Information Resource
#9
In my experience (with long-life medical devices that receive service visits) 'accelerated life testing' is not sufficient to speak to "intended service life". Accelerated life testing can inform activities necessary to establish for the support a device over its expected service life.

It is necessary that a medical device remain safe over its entire expected service life, which is where the terminology about maintaining essential performance and basic safety comes from. I'm ignorant of any particular regulatory expectations, but manufacturers of certain devices may have 'regulatory attention' (e.g. transmission of pathogens from Endoscopes and Cooler-Heaters used in surgical environments... the sterilization/cleaning of those devices may be considered a 'service life' dimension of those products).

That being said; a regulatory body may look for risk analysis around certain elements of any particular design with an eye towards expected service life. For example: if a device includes batteries which must be serviced it seems appropriate to me that a regulatory authority may want to examine the data used to establish the expected lifetime of the batteries as well as the service procedures for battery replacement.
 

david316

Involved In Discussions
#10
Thanks. Assume the device doesn't require routine service. Maybe an example. Consider a Forehead thermometer. The manual states that the accuracy is +/- 0.5 Fahrenheit (+/- 0.3 degrees C). When determining essential performance as per 60601-1 the essential performance is determined to be +/- 1.0 Fahrenheit. As part of V&V, life testing is conducted to prove that the device meets essential performance and basic safety over its service life. Prior to the test the device is accurate to +/-0.2 Fahrenheit. At the end of life testing the device operates as per normal but is only accurate to +/- 0.8 Fahrenheit. Hence the device still meets essential performance and by definition the risk is acceptable. Is this acceptable?

Also, assume there is no instructions in the user manual to check or do periodic calibration.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
P ISO 20072 Requirements - Example or template of a DFP (device functionality profile) Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
T FDA UDI Question - Class II Medical Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
blackholequasar ISO 13485 certification prior to Medical Device Manufacturing... worth it? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
P Brexit Germany - Import Medical Device For Clinical Study EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M When is a device a device, and when not..? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 14
A Making changes to IDE device Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
M Medical Device Marketing Material - Control of Social Media 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
Ed Panek Make sure you hire competent QA RA Folks before making a "Medical Device." Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
B Acquired Medical Device Product Line - Documentation Requirements for Device Master Record ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
D EU MDR - Change of device name (legacy device) EU Medical Device Regulations 4
MedicalDevicesCanada How to find a medical device contract manufacturer, MDSAP certified? Canada Medical Device Regulations 4
T Accessories and Parent Device Submission Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
P Device Classification CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
M EU MDR - Retrospective Study for expanding indications of a legacy device EU Medical Device Regulations 0
dgrainger Informational MHRA's Software and AI as a Medical Device Change Programme UK Medical Device Regulations 0
S Clinical Evaluation of equivalent device EU Medical Device Regulations 6
S Device with different options for a sub-component - CE marking implications EU Medical Device Regulations 2
CharlieUK EU representative details on Class I device CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
S Medical Device - Technical Documentation structure EU Medical Device Regulations 1
LostLouie Archived Specifications and Drawings for Medical Device Technical Files EU Medical Device Regulations 4
F USB charging and NIBP device IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
B Reprocessing of an accessory for a medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S Do you follow your QMS for non-device software features? Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
J Can we register non-device clinical decision support software under draft guidance? Other US Medical Device Regulations 5
L UDI-DI - Device will be sold by itself in a box EU Medical Device Regulations 2
I How to find required testing for a specific device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
Watchcat REGULATORY WATCHCAT - De Novo Proposed Rule - Device Description Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
D Device Master Record (DMR) checklist ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
G Parent Device as the Predicate for an Accessory Other US Medical Device Regulations 5
A Class 1 medical device - Thailand Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
J Device notification / registration with competent authority EU Medical Device Regulations 2
P Interchangeable/alternative parts in BOM (medical device) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
U Is Initial Importer Status Required if a Medical Device is Manufactured and Sterilized by an OEM in the US Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
I Calibrating the monitoring device but not the unit General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
J Shoe Covers - medical device class I EU Medical Device Regulations 3
J Software as a Medical Device - SaMD IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 3
C CE Marking - Medical Device Accessories EU Medical Device Regulations 0
H Existing cloud based medical device - questions regarding improving the processes IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 6
P Certification process for registered device China Medical Device Regulations 12
Nihls MSA after the device move Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
I How to determine "generic/me too" device? Japan Medical Device Regulations 0
R Debug mode in software/device validation IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
K Unused Service Parts in Newly Manufactured Medical Device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
S Determining a device category according to the MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
B A.I diagnostic software is considered as medical device in FDA? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
J Medical device repairs (to upholstery) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
Ed Panek Apple Provides New Medical Device Cautions 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
shimonv Can you submit a traditional application for a class I device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
C Does a medical device active (zinc oxide) needs BPR registration in EU? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
DanBOS Cloud Connected Medical Device 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom