Device functionality over service life - Objective evidence required?

david316

Involved In Discussions
#1
Hello,

If a medical device has key performance attributes is there any requirement that the manufacturer must prove the device is capable of meeting said performance limits throughout the devices service life? My understanding is that a manufacturer must prove that essential performance and basic safety must be maintained over the service life but I am unsure about other performance limits (e.g. limits documented in the manual) which are narrower than the essential performance limits?

e.g.
Manual states oxygen is controlled to +/- 1 lpm but essential performance is determined to be +/- 5 lpm.

Thanks for any guidance.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

indubioush

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
Often times this type of testing is dictated by the standard that is specific to that type of medical device. Is there a standard that is specific to your type of device?
 

david316

Involved In Discussions
#3
The general standard IEC 60601-1 only states the the expected service must be specified by the manufacturer and that during this time the device must remain safe (i.e. essential performance and basic safety is maintained). The particular standard then clarifies the essential performance requirements. There is nothing I can find that covers off whether a manufacturer needs to prove a device performs to its stated specifications (which may be tighter/different to the essential performance limits) over the service life.
 

david316

Involved In Discussions
#5
So if via the risk assessment you document that there are no unacceptable risks related to reliability and that the residual risk is acceptable you don't need to prove the product functions as intended over the service life?
 

indubioush

Quite Involved in Discussions
#7
There is not enough information to delve in fully. We don't know what type of device you have; we don't know all the product requirements; we don't know if you plan on servicing your device, etc. If you are the manufacturer, you are in the best position to determine what testing needs to be done to ensure device reliability and safety.
 

david316

Involved In Discussions
#8
I guess I should have asked if there are any regulations or standards that require that a manufacturer prove that an electrical medical device performs as intended over it's service life. My understanding is 60601-1 requires a manufacturer to state the devices service life over which essential performance and basic safety is expected to be maintained. I would expect accelerated life testing to prove this. But as far as I know there is no requirement to prove a medical device operates as per it's specs with accelerated life testing or that it even needs to be justified. You need to conduct risk management as per 14971 and identify any risks associated with the device which would include the device falling to operate within its spec and make the risks acceptable. But this does not mandate that testing must be conducted to prove a device performs as intended over it's life. Servicable or not.

So the questions is...is it acceptable to prove as per 60601-1 that a medical device maintains essential performance and basic safety over it's service life as well as conducting risk management as per 14971 or are there regulations or expectations from regulatory bodies that additional testing be conducted?
 

Tidge

Quite Involved in Discussions
#9
In my experience (with long-life medical devices that receive service visits) 'accelerated life testing' is not sufficient to speak to "intended service life". Accelerated life testing can inform activities necessary to establish for the support a device over its expected service life.

It is necessary that a medical device remain safe over its entire expected service life, which is where the terminology about maintaining essential performance and basic safety comes from. I'm ignorant of any particular regulatory expectations, but manufacturers of certain devices may have 'regulatory attention' (e.g. transmission of pathogens from Endoscopes and Cooler-Heaters used in surgical environments... the sterilization/cleaning of those devices may be considered a 'service life' dimension of those products).

That being said; a regulatory body may look for risk analysis around certain elements of any particular design with an eye towards expected service life. For example: if a device includes batteries which must be serviced it seems appropriate to me that a regulatory authority may want to examine the data used to establish the expected lifetime of the batteries as well as the service procedures for battery replacement.
 

david316

Involved In Discussions
#10
Thanks. Assume the device doesn't require routine service. Maybe an example. Consider a Forehead thermometer. The manual states that the accuracy is +/- 0.5 Fahrenheit (+/- 0.3 degrees C). When determining essential performance as per 60601-1 the essential performance is determined to be +/- 1.0 Fahrenheit. As part of V&V, life testing is conducted to prove that the device meets essential performance and basic safety over its service life. Prior to the test the device is accurate to +/-0.2 Fahrenheit. At the end of life testing the device operates as per normal but is only accurate to +/- 0.8 Fahrenheit. Hence the device still meets essential performance and by definition the risk is acceptable. Is this acceptable?

Also, assume there is no instructions in the user manual to check or do periodic calibration.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
P ISO 20072 Requirements - Example or template of a DFP (device functionality profile) Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
K Medical Device Repairs and ISO Scope ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
R Manufacturing plants relocation - Medical Device Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
R Medical Device - Change manufacturing plant Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
K Multiple function device products EU Medical Device Regulations 0
O Clarifying FDA definition of "finished device" and “capable of functioning” 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
shimonv Classification of a cloud- base viewer for the output from a medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
A FDA guidance on non-sterile Medical Device Packaging Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
Aliken Fluoride sustained-release device Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
K Advertising and promotion of device under investigation China Medical Device Regulations 1
A Medical device Mode Of Action CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
P Best Global Option to become an OBL/PLM/Virtual medical device brand in 2020 Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
rob73 UK Medical Device Regulations Forum - UK MDR Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 1
S Philippines CMDL (Certificate of Medical Device Listing) Elsmar Cove Forum ToS and Forum Policies 0
C Combination Products - Distributor of the device? EU Medical Device Regulations 7
J 21 CFR 821 Medical Device Tracking Requirement 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
J Is Device Tracking Card an actual requirement under FDA regulation? Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
N Drawing tolerance vs. Measurement device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S Iraq Medical Device registration Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
R Medical Device Software Certification IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
D Class IIB Medical Device Accessories - OTS Tablets Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
C GUDID Device record history Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
K Doubt on insulation class of a device IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
F Change to Formulation due to Reach (China Medical Device Regulations) China Medical Device Regulations 0
dgrainger Informational UK guidance on Device regulation from Jan 2021 published UK Medical Device Regulations 19
R Accelerated Aging - Creating test samples - Implantable medical device Question Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
A First CE-mark class III implantable device under MDD EU Medical Device Regulations 8
M EU MDR - Labilities when a device is discontinued from the Market EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Sravan Manchikanti How to interpret '8.3 Control of nonconforming product' for SaMD device while implementing ISO 13485 & MDSAP ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
T Clinical evaluation of a new medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Beliz Biocompatibility Testing for Laser Epilation Device EU Medical Device Regulations 2
A Packaging device with accessories already on the market Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
7 Iraq Medical Device Chemical Regulations Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
J UCLA extension Medical Device Engineering Program Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
Q Storing and developing SAMD (Software as a Medical Device) in the Cloud IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 3
I ISO 2233:2000 Question - Medical Device Shipping/Transportation Validation Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
A How to make sure whether the predicated device is marked with EC certificate? EU Medical Device Regulations 8
R Identify Medical Device characterstics as Annex C of ISO 14971 Risk Management ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
shimonv FDA News FDA guidance on Multiple Function Device Products (8/2020) Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
O ANATEL certification of Medical Device Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
B MDR equvalent device - can you use a medicine as an equivalent 'device' EU Medical Device Regulations 8
Ajit Basrur FDA News Harmonizing and Modernizing Regulation of Medical Device Quality Systems (7-2020) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
K Is UDI (Unique Device Identifier) symbol mandatory under EU MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A Legal Manufacturer Medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
F How to register class I device to all European Competent Autorities(CA) when we are European manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 4
K Sterile barrier system symbols - Label redlines for a Class III device (Kit Box) EU Medical Device Regulations 0
D Class 3 Device - Change of supplier of material Canada Medical Device Regulations 6
N Usability testing required for FDA IDE (investigational device exemption)? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom