Hi all,
I have small questing related to the shelf life of a device.
Reviewing current and draft guidance documents, its fairly clear that we can change the expiration date of the device by documenting the evidence internally.
Current Guidance: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device (1997)
B9: Change in packaging or expiration dating --> Yes --> Documentation
Draft Guidance: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device (2019)
B4: Is there a change in packaging or expiration dating? --> Yes --> B4.1: Is the same method or protocol, described in previous 510(k), used to support change --> Yes --> Documentation
Therefore, for example, if we gain 510(k) clearance for a device with a 12 month shelf life, if we had appropriate data we could expand the shelf life by e.g. 6 months by documenting this internally and not involving the FDA.
I'm wondering to what extremes this could be taken? Would it be possible to gain clearance for a device with a 1 month shelf life. Then expand the shelf life to 48 months without involving the FDA?
The reason i'm asking is that if we're gaining clearance on a device using accelerated aging data, the 510(k) review time and the shelf life study could be run in parallel and result in us getting the device to market a lot sooner. e.g.
Thanks for your help!
I have small questing related to the shelf life of a device.
Reviewing current and draft guidance documents, its fairly clear that we can change the expiration date of the device by documenting the evidence internally.
Current Guidance: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device (1997)
B9: Change in packaging or expiration dating --> Yes --> Documentation
Draft Guidance: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device (2019)
B4: Is there a change in packaging or expiration dating? --> Yes --> B4.1: Is the same method or protocol, described in previous 510(k), used to support change --> Yes --> Documentation
Therefore, for example, if we gain 510(k) clearance for a device with a 12 month shelf life, if we had appropriate data we could expand the shelf life by e.g. 6 months by documenting this internally and not involving the FDA.
I'm wondering to what extremes this could be taken? Would it be possible to gain clearance for a device with a 1 month shelf life. Then expand the shelf life to 48 months without involving the FDA?
The reason i'm asking is that if we're gaining clearance on a device using accelerated aging data, the 510(k) review time and the shelf life study could be run in parallel and result in us getting the device to market a lot sooner. e.g.
- gain a data for a short shelf life
- Submit the 510(k)
- Wait e.g. 200 days for the completion of the shelf life study and the clearance of the device
- Document the change for the shelf life internally for the planned long shelf life
- Launch the device
Thanks for your help!