SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

DHR question: Traceability of components

racglobal

Involved In Discussions
#1
Hi everyone, a DHR is a lot manufacturing record. For the components that are used in manufacturing, how can we indicate which lots the components come from? In other words, how to provide traceability to the original lot #s of the components from suppliers? We are a small company putting together the manufacturing record for the first time. Can somebody share a sample DHR? Thanks.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jen

Starting to get Involved
#2
In my company, we use batch manufacturing record to record the raw material and the lot number. You can find a lot example by goggle "batch manufacturing record". Maybe can give you some idea on how to build your manufacturing record.
 

Jean_B

Trusted Information Resource
#3
You have things to arrange and choices to make. But it all starts with: determine the value of tracing the (status of the) item (whether it is material, component, subassembly, assembly, packaged product, presence, processing). There is a cost involved, and while overhead might be the biggest factor and make you go 'what the heck, let's do them all', especially in the early phases this is not the case.
Now what is value that traceability enables? The simplest overview is:
  • when you cannot easily/cheaply/risklessly redetermine the status (i.e. did this pass/fail the test; did it undergo the cleaning, strengthening process)
  • when you must be able to identify that part of your product for planned future action (i.e. service, calibration, repair, upgrades; as a pivotal assembly of 'stuff went so bad we need to recall' or
  • when you must be able to identify that part of your product for unplanned but probably action as a vulnerable part (i.e. you have had problems with similar items in the past and want to be able to really narrow down your actions based on a strong root cause analysis which often builds on separating matters through traceability))
Once you've identified each part (and process/location) that has such characteristics you need to make a decision:
  • Do I rely on the supplier provided batch indication (if they're all providing it it's the cheapest, but they might make mistakes you don't find out until later, and not all of them always care as much)?
  • Do I transpose provided items into my own internal supply batch numbers (usually more consistency and control on numbering, though more upfront cost)? You need to have one place, and one place only where you do this, and you must foolproof it so every crosslink is made. If you forget one you might go up bone-creek in your production planning and traceability both.
  • Will there be a difference in when or to what purpose I take lots out of the batches, so will I further specify traceability in-house at the part level, will I rely on the DHR or don't I care? Could be the case when you're treating material that came in before then using that lot in separate products.
Now you have an idea of whatfor and what, the how depends on your operation:
  • Few but high cost items? Maybe encode in QR code and introduce scanners to make sure no writing mistakes enter into the record, and allow for easy notation later in the field (which is usually the realm of the high-cost items anyway).
  • Many low cost items in many batches? Maybe still encode in barcodes, because the longer the number is the easier it is fouled up.
  • Many low cost item in few batches? Handwritten on the DHR probably best. Shift to scan if you are producing huge amounts which do not have batch but separate DHR's.
  • You can stand some wider spread? First-In First-Out on a date level.
  • Not at all and save/insure against when it goes wrong.
Noone says you can't mix the above, but due to habituation of personnel its best to keep it to as few systems to learn for any one person as possible. Could still mean you have different levels at different lines (i.e. equipment versus consumable).
Advantage of scanners is that you might be able to drop data directly into an ERP and have searchable traceability. Because if you've never had to sort through thousands of DHR's to identify the relevant lots you don't know how much that Want becomes a strong Must. It also helps with production planning, so there's more happy stakeholders.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
E Procedure ( SOP) for Device Master Record ( DMR ) and for Device History Record (DHR)? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
E What are appropriate deviations for a LHR/DHR? (Medical Device Company) Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
P DHF, DMR and DHR in MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
W Is it required to stamp obsolete hard copy DHR's "obsolete"? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
R Are DMR (device master record) and DHR (device history record) inspected by FDA or audited by an NB ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
R In this type of Legal Manufacturer-CMO arrangement, what happens to the DHR? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
M 13485- DHR requirement for a distributor? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
Q Is a DHR enough to fulfill 13485:2016's Medical Device File requirement? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
L Page Numbering requirement for DHR Report Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 3
V What is required in terms of the DHR, DMR, DHF? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 4
K DHR approval requirements for stand-alone software US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
Q Incomplete Process Sheets Closure - DHR - Doc Control Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
Q DMR and DHR - Two requirements, One Document 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
C Are DHR and Design Dossier synonymous? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 9
W Maintaining Component Traceability in DHR (Design History Record) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
A Medical Device Service Records linked to DHR (Design History Record)? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
G Could I destroy my DHR hard copy after 2 years after pdf'ing them ? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
E Better control of DHR (Design History Record) during processing Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
R Who owns the DHR (Device History Record) for the Medical Device? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
M DHR (Design History Record) Requirements - Concessions Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 12
E Traceability Requirements for Medical Device History Records (DHR's) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
B DHR's (Device History Record) for Class 1 and 2 Medical Devices Not Required? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
Q DMR-Device Master Record vs DHF-Design History File vs DHR-Device History Record 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 50
Q How much detail in DHR (Device History Record) is too much? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
C What is the Minimum Regulatory Requirement for Record Retention of DHR by Suppliers Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 9
I DHR (Device History Record) for Medical Device Software 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 7
P DHR and components under deviation - Medical Devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T DMR/DHF/DHR/Batch Records/Master Batch Records ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M DMR, DHR and DHF physical form 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
S Specific records to be retained for Class II devices per 820.184 DHR ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
S Device History Records (DHR) Component Traceability / Serial Number Requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
R Sec. 820.120 Device Labeling & DHR - Count and Document All Labels 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
S Device History Record (DHR) Templates or Examples Wanted Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
D Question on Documented Calibration versus ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A Design Change/ECO Related Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
S Configuration Item definition question AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
C Quality Management System Question ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 32
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J IATF 16949 Calibration/Verification records question ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety 5
I IMDS Error Message Question RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 1
lanley liao Question regarding the calibration of monitoring and measure equipment. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 3
C Gauge R&R Question Using Minitab Software 1
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
K Question on MDR classification EU Medical Device Regulations 4
D Question on equipment - when to use reference only or research only stickers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D Work Instruction Question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Clinical Decision Support Software Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
John C. Abnet VDA 6.3 - Question 7.3 - "blocking of parts" VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom