Different kinds of Risk Analysis for various Hazards

#1
Dear all,

when I started with risk management many years ago there was one single product risk analyis. We defined all possible hazards and started to find causes. Each cause was refined into more and more different root causes. That was a big amount of work and then we recognized that this is even not always necessary.
One example: There might be a mechanic part of the medical device that can shear off and a user may be injured by the sharp edge. In this case the cause of the shearing off could have several reasons: mistakes in handling by user, mistake by wrong transport conditions and so on.
In the end we decided to stop the root cause analysis at the moment where we found a good mitigating measure that covers all possible causes, e.g. a material that can not shear off.
Or another approach: we never go deeper than 3-5 levels of roots, just as a thumb rule.

That worked for us for many years.

Now a new discussion started in the company: Some people asked for seperate risk analysis covering special departments: purchasing, transportation/logistics, production, service, ...

We discussed about it and the proponents of that approach have the argument that 14971 tells us to cover ALL aspects of the medical product' life cycle.

On the other hand - and that is also my opinion - we have a single product risk analysis that covers all possible causes for each hazard and by that we already cover purchasing, service or other impacts implicitly.

What is your opinion or your way to deal with that question? Do you have an own dedicated risk analysis for each different field like production, service, purchasing and so on?

Just a remark: I am not talking about FMEAs for economic reasons or product/service quality. I am just talking about the patient/user risks adressed by 14971.

Thanks for your answers in advance!
Chris
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
We've often found it helpful to have separate analyses for 'focus' areas. It's quite typical that we do separate FMEAs for design, use, software, and process (manufacturing).

We typically have a core set of people on the analysis team and then bring in discipline-specific folks for these focus areas. It broadens the participation, enables a deeper dive into the specific discipline, and results in better controls.
 
#3
I agree completely with your approach where 14971 covers all aspects of the medical device life cycle and I would respond by telling them and showing them how it's already covered.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Process Audits for 1200 different kinds of Tube Sizes Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 9
K Biocompatibility Testing - Multile products of different sizes and shapes US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
T Different Authorized Representative and distributors in Saudi Arabia Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
P Design verification driven by new equipment. How is this different than process validation? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
R Yield Plot for different groupings Using Minitab Software 3
R IEC 60601-1 - Different methods of achievement of the isolation IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
T Defining sampling plan for different AQL AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 1
F How do you add accuracies for tools with different measurement devices? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
R Does any here use an internal auditing tool that works on different platforms? Internal Auditing 3
H What is different between PED certificate and CPR certificate? Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
R QMS Standard appilications on different Defense Sector Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
A Statistical Analysis - Check if these organisms at different concentrations affect the growth of wheat seedlings Using Minitab Software 4
M Different procedure templates for different standards - We have two different management systems ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
M Identical Sales Package in Different Countries Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
E Different requirements for Class II and Class III Medical Devices Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
C Subsidiaries; same/different Quality Policies? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
Q Controlling documents in two different Applications ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
A Touch current in single fault conditions test and earth leakage current in normal conditions test, are they really different tests? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8
H IFU in different language other than English EU Medical Device Regulations 5
J Ethicon Suture - Why Ethicon specs are different internationally Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 0
A Torque Value for Different types of Fasteners (Socket Head, Button Head, CSK) Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
M Different websites for different markets - FDA, Health Canada or other requirements Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
C PCBA Hardware Component different failure types - How to rate detection? FMEA and Control Plans 8
E Different types of Actions? CARs, OFIs or N/A ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
J DoE (Design of Experiments) - Multiple responses with different factors Using Minitab Software 2
smryan ISO 9001:2015 8.6 & 8.5.1.h) - Redundant or different? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
V Additional Controls for processing the raw data on different computers (processing system) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 5
MrTetris Informational Risk Register - Same hazardous situation, different severity of harms ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 7
A PFMEA severity score different applications FMEA and Control Plans 11
xfngrs How similar or different are IATF 16949 Vs. ISO 13485 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
I Requirements for different Labeling Levels 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
S CE Marking requirements - A Medical device with different config sold under same name EU Medical Device Regulations 0
B IATF 16949 - Different Registrars for remote and manufacturing sites? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
W Transport validation to different climate zones ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
W Design and Process Validation - Different? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
M Is it ok to provide a different language upon request? EU Medical Device Regulations 25
O New stability - Yes or No - Similar product but for different intended use EU Medical Device Regulations 1
D Design Transfer between two companies with different QMS CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
P Any official doc/spec on different types of Yield calculation? Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
R Medical devices certified by different notified bodies EU Medical Device Regulations 6
V Software as control or protection will lead to different Software Safety Class? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 18
M I have 3 different factors - DOE help Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
Q Is it acceptable to mix components from two different lots into an assembly? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
H Numbering for documents with same content but different language ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T QMS/MDD scope - Two companies located in different places work together Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 10
A Why I get a different kind of regression equation when I do the same data in a differ Using Minitab Software 7
W Can 2 different sites under different Quality System have a common management review? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Indications for Use - Is it possible to have a different indication for use EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K Sampling Plan for transparent tubular plastic parts from 32 different cavities Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
S Minitab runs at different speeds on identical PCs Using Minitab Software 5
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom