Marc said:
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking.
"Importance of QMS" does not equate grammatically or philosophically with
poka-yoke -- poka is Japanese for "inadvertent mistake". Yokeru is Japanese for "to avoid." It is often used as a synonym for ZQC, error-proofing, or mistake-proofing.
poka-yoke devices -- mechanisms that either prevent a mistake from being made or make the mistake obvious at a glance.
since it doesn't take into effect "customer satisfaction."
(e.g. Some suppliers may have excellent poka yoke, but don't pass the inherent saving on to customers and thereby do not use it as an effective marketing tool. Poka yoke may be invisible to a customer - how the supplier creates an error-free product is unimportant to most buyers if they get it error-free at a competitive price.)
Also, since poka yoke can be present even when no other QMS components are present (purchasing, sales, marketing, Contract review, Supplier approval, etc.), it seems to have no relation to the IMPORTANCE of a QMS.
A QMS can exist and be important to an organization WITHOUT the implementation of a conscious poka yoke program.
I'd certainly be interested in seeing the trail between your premise and your conclusion, Donald Duck.