I don't think we know enough to be able to judge ...
Is this one document of 26400 pages, 26400 copies of one document, 264 copies of 100 docs ... ?
Were there several drafts? Which version was approved? How does everyone know they approved the right draft?
Does it display a version or issue number, a date, something that shows the version that was approved?
What's a "controlled" stamp? A stamp that says "Controlled"? A date stamp?
Why not just put a version number on the document itself?
I think it helps to remember the principles that underlie the ISO 9001 requirements. For document control, the relevant principle is to ensure that those who need the document can easily find it when needed, and be confident they have the right version. (That applies through the approval cycle as well, so as to be sure that everyone is reviewing and approving the correct draft - sometimes there are several drafts, all different, seeds of confusion.)
I'd use this principle to evaluate your options ...
... To which you might add, write the version number or date of approval or some kind of identifier in the document itself, and avoid the printing and stamping, or the scanning.
If you use the intranet, can everyone who needs the document access it from their normal place of work?
If you use a DVD/CD, what will they do with it? Do they all have computers (that can read it -- netbooks don't have DVD/CD drives) easily available? How will you locate and withdraw copies of the DVD/CD and of stuff printed from it when the next version is published?
Quality management is supposed to be about making life simple and error-proof for everyone - including the quality manager.
Hope this helps,
Pat