That's like saying airplanes will work in theory. I don't know why I ever respond to you, but here we go.
I understand that you have a limited point of view but there are many ways to achieve compliance. Often you must build upon a pre-existing system and make use of what's already there. You're one size fits all approach works in theory (emphasis added) but not everyone's got deep pockets. You have to think outside the box to achieve a high standard of quality while maintaining profitability.
It's OK to disagree. Forums exist for exchange of different opinions. Let's please try to keep this discussion to the point, not to the person.
When I wrote that it should work in theory but it's not the best approach
in my opinion, I also explained why. I pointed to some aspects that I thought could be problematic. I don't know your specific case to the last detail, so I hoped you would explain how it
does work for you. Unfortunately you chose not to.
I did not state or hint that there's only one way to comply. I agree that there are many ways. I'm also quite sure that you will agree that some ways are better or easier than others. The goal was to try and highlight the pros and cons. If you feel that your way has no cons, fine. I definitely didn't suggest you were not in compliance.
The explanation about "working with what you find" and "not everyone has deep pockets" is also unnecessary. I've been in that situation more than once. I agree that sometimes you have to be creative, however such creative solutions are not always recommended as standard practice. I thought that this discussion was more general than a specific company / situation, and I responded from that perspective.