Do Attribute Control Charts really help?

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#1
I am learning to apply Control Charts to understand process signals. Of late, I tried to use Control chart for some of our attribute data but find it very insensitive to identify signals that require attention. I am attaching a sample here with hypothetical data though. I have constructed both Xmr chart and C Chart. XmR apparently does a better job. This is not the only instance. I tried it on 3 other data and all of them have ended up with wide limits. Please help me. Is there anything I can change in my approach or perspective?
 

Attachments

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Several things:

1. In general, if you have measurement data, it is much better to use Xmr charting rather than collapsing the data to percent that are acceptable, or percent that exceed a certain threshold.

2. A c-chart is only used when you expect something to behave as a Poisson Process. Poisson events must be independent from each other and have a constant probability of occurrence in any given time interval.

3. Your example data is obviously NOT Poisson, given the vast difference between the XmR and C chart control limits. This may be a VERY IMPORTANT conclusion if you had expected your data to be Poisson. Dr. Deming relates a p-chart story where he plotted the percent defective over time, and the data were too tightly grouped around the average. Come to find out, there was falsification of the data occurring, with the inspector stopping counting defective product once a 10% defect rate was reached.
 

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#3
Thanks a lot.

1. In general, if you have measurement data, it is much better to use Xmr charting rather than collapsing the data to percent that are acceptable, or percent that exceed a certain threshold.
I understand that. When I measure in percent, sometimes the data point is influenced by the denominator. Especially when denominator is low, even a small change in numerator effects huge difference in percentage. However, under some circumstances measuring in percentage makes the measurement meaningful and comparable. I think XmR is the best option even for percentages. But sometimes even XmR results in wide limits.

2. A c-chart is only used when you expect something to behave as a Poisson Process. Poisson events must be independent from each other and have a constant probability of occurrence in any given time interval.
Can I use XmR chart wherever I am not sure about the distribution type?
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
I would add two points to Steve's input.
the data you show is very 'chunky' and this will lead to larger control limits even with an XMR chart. (I realize your attachment is a simulation, but the point still holds)

If you have a large varitiation in the sample size (denominator) the limits will be very different for each data point based on the samples size. (this is how robust the proper control chart is to all kinds of variation). If teh variation is large enough, teh XMR will not be the best chart.

Unfortunately the choice of control is not a process that can be done without thought, understanding of the process and understanding of the how the different charts and rational subgrouping works.

I once explained it this way: a chain saw is a great tool, so is a nail file. but I would never use a chain saw to file my nails or a nail file to cut down a tree.
 
D

DRAMMAN

#6
When I worked at a company who was a global household name in the quality world our stats and SPC training was weeks and weeks of great training. The Attribute SPC training consisted of a paragraph that basically said attribute data is of little value and to figure out how to get variable data.
 

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#7
I know a QC Instructor for JUSE. He even recommends what he calls 'barbaric control limit' i.e. a control limit based on the trend, that will logically separate signals. And of course sometimes the choice of control chart to improve the process itself is a common sense decision.
 

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
I should point out that at many points in the "real world", all you have are attributes data. For example, how many injuries do you have per month (C-chart). Or how many injuries per 200,000 hours worked do you have (u-chart). Or what percent of injuries are back injuries (p-chart). Alll three of these could be very important trending charts for the company safety program.
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
I agree that it always better to monitor continuous data when possible. Not only is there better resolution, but if you have a highly capable process, you can detect changes before too many - if any - defects are produced. Other than some poisson events (like particle counts, microbial contamination, etc.) most categorical data represents defects. So your process is already 'not capable'. But it may be acceptable - at least in comparison to other problems. Customer complaints, service events, visual defects... in these cases a control chart will at least keep the organization from reacting to random noise and from missign true excursions - or improvements.
 
D

DRAMMAN

#10
As Bev stated, the biggest value of using attribute control charts for tracking items like defect counts and defect percentages if that the charts almost always show the proces is in control so it helps keep the oganization from over reacting to one bad measurement period. This helps keep the organization focused on improving the system as opposed to wild goose chases in response to one negative event.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Suitability of Attribute Control Charts for ppm Level Control Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
S Attribute G&R for all Visual Controls in Control Plan Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
P Attribute Control Chart in my Process - Black Belt says Not Appropriate Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
R Control plans for attribute hydraulic/electronic test equipment FMEA and Control Plans 1
L Attribute Control Chart Question - I plan to use to np chart Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
D Question: How to analyze numerical and attribute data Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 11
A Attribute , for example C chart Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 16
S MSA for attribute relation gage Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
I Overwhelmed with attribute MSA requirement for visual inspection IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
H Need MSA 4th ed. compliant attribute MSA template General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
A Attribute Analysis for colour matching scale Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
K Transform variable data into attribute data Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 24
K IATF & Attribute Study requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
T Correct MSA study for an automated camera system which makes attribute inspection Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
O Examples of Critical process parameter (CPP) and Critical quality attribute (CQA) Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
C Applying Weibayes to Attribute sampling Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 0
M Template for Attribute Gage R & R wanted Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
B Easy Software Needed for Recording Mainly Attribute Data Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 2
A Does an attribute study (Go/NoGo pin gage) need two studies (1 for each pin) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
B Attribute Gage R&R study according to "Charbonneau" Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
R Can a Attribute Study be considered a Visual Inspection? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 6
J MSA on Part Specific Attribute Fixtures Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
B IATF 16949 Cl. 8.6.6 - Acceptance Criteria - Zero Defects Attribute Data Sampling IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
L Gage Blocks: Attribute or Variable Gage? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
T Attribute vs Variable Inspection Data ISO 13485 Requirement ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
D Calibration of a Width Gage Slot with an Attribute Gage - Maximum Width Condition General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 16
R Visual Attribute Inspector Capability and KAPPA Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
D attribute gage RR in a unique way Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
M Proper Gauging - GD&T - Attribute gage to check true positioning on the shop floor Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
P RQL/AQL from Attribute Data Six Sigma 1
M Population failure rate based on attribute data Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
V Minitab - Attribute Gage Study Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
J Attribute Test Method Validation 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
A Attribute Sampling Plans with Switching Rules - Software Recommendations Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
F MSA - Measurement System Analysis Attribute Data Crosstab sheet APQP and PPAP 1
B Bayes Success-Run on Attribute Data - Determining Sample Size Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
A Attribute Inspection P Chart Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 9
S Visual Inspection Galvanized Attribute Study Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
N Example of how to perform a Visual Attribute Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
K MINITAB 16 - Attribute gage study (Analytic method) and Gage R&R Study (Expanded) Using Minitab Software 2
J Minimum number of parts to do an attribute gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
D Reliability of an Attribute Inspection based on Historical Data Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 8
S Cross Tab Attribute Gauge Study form Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 3
V MSA Attribute Data Analysis Study IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
S Destructive Attribute MSA for Simple Water Leak Check in Trailers Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
A Minimum Number of Parts for Attribute (Go / NoGo) Data Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
J Attribute MSA - Number of samples Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
Manix MSA - How to Approach a Gauge R&R Go/NoGo Attribute Study Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
B Best Attribute Data Sampling Plan - Early Production Containment Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
E MSA of Attribute Gauges Signal Detection Method Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom