Do you still collect hard copies of objective evidence when auditing?

Do you still collect hard copies of objective evidence when auditing [internal]?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 69.2%
  • No

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • I just want to see the results

    Votes: 2 15.4%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .

Caster

An Early Cover
Trusted Information Resource
#11
Yes for internal audits

We use a digital camera and create an annotated Powerpoint walk through of the area. This is used in the closing meeting and is very effective. It get's attention.

It is also nice to show improvements made from the last audit. It creates a nice visual history.

We print control plans, procedures and work instructions and mark them up heavily (and neatly) during the audit. We then scan and pdf all hard copy evidence and attach it to the audit to support the findings and CARs.

The entire audit file is electronic, there is no paper.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#12
chergh said:
The question was really in respect to internal audits, wouldn't allow an external audit to take hard copies, so should have put that in the question. :bonk:

My company is currently working towards ISO 9001 registration and to help us along a little we got a consultant in to help us work through some of the audits. When he came back from each of his audits he had a pile of paper as objective evidence.

I know that when I am conducting internal audits I may occasionally grab a hard copy of an emailbut 99 times out of a 100 I only have ID's that can be used to locate the evidence I found. Was just curious if many people, like our consultant, took hard copies.
I added the word "internal" to your poll to make your intention clear.
My internal auditors were like "boy scouts" on a hike - take nothing but pictures or notes, leave nothing but footprints.
'
I'd like to echo Randy in that they looked for "good" stuff, too, which might be valuable as part of "improvement."

At every point, the auditors asked,
  • "Does the actual activity follow the plan?"
  • If yes, they asked personnel, "Do you have any ideas that would make this process work better (more efficiently?)"
  • If no, they asked, "Why?" (perhaps the personnel thought there was a better way? some other reason? too complicated? no supplies? not enough time? forgot? etc.)
Auditors only stepped in to stop a process if there was a suspicion of life, health, safety concerns. They were empowered to do this. Otherwise, they went to a department head immediately to report a suspected non-conformance. Department head might make immediate change or refer matter to the Material Review Board for confirmation. At this point, the primary question became whether a nonconforming process resulted in nonconforming product. Auditors did not make decisions about whether product was nonconforming, only whether the activity was proceeding according to plan as they understood it.

I want to stress auditors did not make a DECISION a process was "nonconforming" - they made a decision that there was a "suspicion." If the suspicion affected life, health, safety, we operated under the premise, "Better safe than sorry."

Interesting poll. I'm eager to see more explanations.
 
B

Bill Pflanz

#13
chergh said:
I was just wondering if people still tend to collect hard copies of objective evidence found in audits?. Personally I have always tended to record serial no's, PO no's or anything that will allow anyone looking at the audit report to go back and find the item, hardocopies are pretty much a last resort for me.

When I first started auditing, I probably did collect some hard copies of objective evidence but it was really to help explain nonconformances. The more audits you do, the less useful and more time consuming it becomes to collect hard copies.

I did keep hard or electronic copies of auditor notes that I took during the audit with information on who and what I audited, which systems appeared to be working and enough identification of a nonconformance so that the auditee could find it and do corrective action.

Personally, I see no value in collecting the hardcopies and it was never questioned by a registrar although they did review my audit notes.

Bill Pflanz
 
J

Joe Cruse

#14
I'm coming around to the idea of keeping little or none of the hardcopy evidence of an audit, outside of the auditors notes. Our new system will keep these electronically. We may ask for hardcopies during the audit for reference in writing notes, findings, or final reports, but I'm no longer sure we need them in the files, just a reference to them in the notes or reports. We still get hard copies of everything in dock audits, along with pictures of the products as they are being loaded for shipment. That will be going electronic as well.

I can't ever recall our registrar keeping hard copies of any evidence (nor would we let them) during audits, so why do I need to?
 
C

cochranemurray

#15
There should be no need to collect hard copies of evidence. If the auditee (or anyone else) agrees at the time that a non conformity exists, that should be enough. There is no mileage in collecting pieces of paper to prove to senior managers that you have found a non conformity exists in their system. The auditing technique should be robust enough to prevent misunderstanding or the need to present evidence at closing meetings.
 
J

jaimezepeda

#16
Sometimes hard copy is only evidence...

There are times when a hard copy is the only evidence left behind. I can think of times when customer-supplied documents cannot be stored or tracked electronically and a hard copy is the only evidence available.

When I have had to keep a hard copy I try to keep a photocopy in order to leave th original where it ought to stay.

Jaime
 

RoxaneB

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#17
Our group of Internal Auditors are trained on the basis that their audit notes should be able to stand up on their own. No copies of Objective Evidence are maintained with the audit report. If I looked at FCD-0123 (Rev.5) Title "blah blah blah", I will record that along with relevent record information so that should I need to go back to see that OE, I can do so. But our notes will support whether compliance was determined, or non-compliance or opportunity for improvement or N/A. Certainly makes for an easily managed audit report!
 
G

Gerry Quinn

#18
I ask for copies of documents during external audits and internal audits if I want a document to refer to when I am writing my report. If you will give me the document, I'll take it. If not, not big deal. My reports have enough detail to stand on their own.
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#19
cochranemurray said:
There should be no need to collect hard copies of evidence. If the auditee (or anyone else) agrees at the time that a non conformity exists, that should be enough. There is no mileage in collecting pieces of paper to prove to senior managers that you have found a non conformity exists in their system. The auditing technique should be robust enough to prevent misunderstanding or the need to present evidence at closing meetings.
You are correct up to a point. Some evidence can be documented in enough detail that copies are unecessary. Some evidence, after all, is verbal. But if there is any question about being able to show enough evidence that the investigator of the CAR can easily find information to find the root cause, I'd rather make sure he has a copy to see.

Unfortunately, especially in new systems, if management is say, less than 100% knowledgeable, they may demand to see copies of what you are citing. I'll even qualify that statement with another: a lot of managers really don't want to have the same level of knowledge as an auditor, and why should they? That is what they have auditors and management reps for. I've found that it is easier to snag a copy for that purpose than to have to go back to an area with 1 or more managers later, especially if your plant is really large. Most of the time, as long as we clearly identify the record/date/whatever identifier we need, we can bring the information up on any computer, but not all businesses are quite so lucky.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#20
SteelMaiden said:
You are correct up to a point. Some evidence can be documented in enough detail that copies are unecessary. Some evidence, after all, is verbal. But if there is any question about being able to show enough evidence that the investigator of the CAR can easily find information to find the root cause, I'd rather make sure he has a copy to see.

Unfortunately, especially in new systems, if management is say, less than 100% knowledgeable, they may demand to see copies of what you are citing. I'll even qualify that statement with another: a lot of managers really don't want to have the same level of knowledge as an auditor, and why should they? That is what they have auditors and management reps for. I've found that it is easier to snag a copy for that purpose than to have to go back to an area with 1 or more managers later, especially if your plant is really large. Most of the time, as long as we clearly identify the record/date/whatever identifier we need, we can bring the information up on any computer, but not all businesses are quite so lucky.
There's nothing wrong with saving documentation if it serves a purpose. The purpose might be mnemonic, serving to help the auditor remember something, or it might be to provide exemplary samples--something that was done particularly well or not so well, so that others can benefit.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Tagin Hosting in the cloud still requires DR (OVH fire) Business Continuity & Resiliency Planning (BCRP) 1
S Are EC type examinations still being conducted under MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
N What is our product classification? (Does Unclassified classification still exists) Other US Medical Device Regulations 14
C Document Control Stamps - Does anyone still stamp their documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24
E Can we still use MEDDEV 2.4/1 rev. 9 when classifying a medical device product under MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
H Can a calibration lab still use ISO 6789:2003 as guide for torque calibrations Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
S IMDRF or still GHTF for STED and other guidance? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 5
Z Do we still have to put UDI if we have DI and lot number seperately on our product ? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
S Can we still manufacture whilst awaiting return of our CE Mark? Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
R FDA - How to discontinue/obsolete medical devices that share sub-components with others that will still be distributed Other US Medical Device Regulations 5
M CEP requirements in MEDDEV 2.7/1, rev 4 and MDR - Are all MEDDEV requirements still applicable? EU Medical Device Regulations 7
M We still have not received our certificate due to a 'backlog' with our auditing body Registrars and Notified Bodies 25
L 510k exemption process - Do you still need to submit technical dossier? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949:2016 still doesn't get 7.1.4 of ISO 9001:2015 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
A Can change control can be closed if the CAPA is still open? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
M Are ASTM F745 & ASTM F75 still valid? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
R Still confused on OPRP and CCP in an ISO 22000 Catering Business Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 3
J ISO 9001:2008 - Can I still conduct Internal Audits in my company? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Wes Bucey Another year - still happy! Covegratulations 5
Marc The "Reading Room" forum is still here The Reading Room 5
T ISO13485 cert expired - Product still CE Marked CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
J Can a Surge test fail to a test level and still considered as Compliant? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
T Predicate device recalled - Still a valid predicate device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
M Is calibration from long ago still valid on never used pipettes? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
Q Can a fail still be a pass? (Criteria Level B for 61000-4-6 Conducted Immunity) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
B Are the GHTF guidance documents still relevant? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 5
Q Form IPC 1720A Assembly Qualification Profile still required? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 1
R Is EN/IEC 60417 still current? Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
M Is a Management Representative still needed for ISO 13485:2015? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Y Consultation: EN 980 still recognized by EU regulation? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
x-files Plans/Requests from Parent Company: Objectives or still plans? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
A CE Certificate is valid until 3.12.2013 - Can I still sell the products in Europe? EU Medical Device Regulations 10
Jen Kirley Can a company with pending air license and water permit still get certified to 14001? REACH and RoHS Conversations 2
N Is Air Burst test for oven treated condoms still required under ISO 4074? Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
AnaMariaVR2 Why Women Still Can?t Have It All Career and Occupation Discussions 1
H Transition of EN 60601-2-22 ed.2 - Still listed, not expired IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
A Essential Design Output - Still a problem 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 7
T If a company becomes TS 16949 certified does it still need ISO 9001 certification? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
I Are IEC 60601-1:2012 and BS EN 60601-1:2006+A11:2011 still identical? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
Marc Are you STILL in the Stock Market? World News 1
N ISO 14971:2007 vs. 2009 - Which Risk Management Standard is still accepted in the EU Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
Marc How to Live Easy in China on $475 a Month and still be able to Save Money Immigration and Expatriate Topics 2
M K-Cup (Keurig) Recycling - This recycling program is still in development Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 2
Antonio Vieira Do you still keep old numbers of Quality Progress in paper format? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 9
N ISO 9001 Implementation - I am still confused on where to start ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
B CNC Machining Shop still heavily relies on First Piece and Final QC Inspection Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
S Supplier Quality Survey - Why are those surveys still sent out? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 13
Wes Bucey Job openings still scarce! Career and Occupation Discussions 0
Antonio Vieira Quality Councils - Do they still exist? Are they useful? Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 5
O Outsourcing part of Design & Dev Process- Still requiring D&D ver & val-7.3.5, 7.3.6? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom