D
My company requires document approvers to be assigned by a combination of role (e.g., regulatory, quality engineer) and document type (e.g., work instruction, validation protocol). How common is that approach?
I think approvers should be known subject matter experts. That would mean assigning approvers by their actual names. Would that cause problems with auditors/inspectors?
Thanks!
I think approvers should be known subject matter experts. That would mean assigning approvers by their actual names. Would that cause problems with auditors/inspectors?
Thanks!