Document Formats: Text Procedures vs. Flow Charts (Process Maps)

N

noboxwine

#1
I have utilized a multitude of Procedure formats, some to little avail, yet 3rd party compliant . Mulit Level bullets and numbering no matter how I try are still confusing. However, a flow chart type format not only looks friendly, it seems to force me to keep is short and simple--- and forces the user to read from start to finish. I now have been developing electronic Visio "Process Instructions", as I call them, that also can include tasks within. They also contain hyperlinks to other documents referenced in bold. I have an independent person walk through it to prove it's effectiveness. If it works, I have accomplished my goal. The attached one, written by our Plant Manager, is easily understood by all tax brackets within our company and has proven more effective than any other format we have tried. This post is three fold: 1) I have heard registrars issuing a Major for this format. How ? 2) Does anyone out there do the same thing and be willing to share their format. 3) Comments / suggestions, please.

Thanks fellow Quality Types. May all your parts that measure within spec perform sound as well.
 

Attachments

Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

JodiB

#2
Not quite..

Some of our old procedures used a flowchart on one side accompanied by numbered text on the other. And now I am building process flows (my ex. was posted earlier) that provides links to other docs, but we still have text procedures also that are built underneath the process flow.

Interesting that you bring this up at this time, because I was just speaking with my boss the other day about how the process flows I'm doing actually look more like a procedure and the supporting "procedures" actually read more like work instructions. And I was wondering if perhaps we should refer to the flowchart then as the "procedure" (and number it accordingly) and the others as "work instructions". I really hate this nomenclature thing.

But what would be missing from the flowchart procedures is exactly what you've managed to box in on your's. The responsibilites, scope, purpose, etc. I don't know if we'll change over or not, but it is nice to see how someone else managed it.

I definitely like flowcharts. Give me a flowchart everytime over an old dry written document.
 

barb butrym

Quite Involved in Discussions
#3
flow charts = majors?

I have never seen a flow chart format be the reason for a major NC.

Some people/auditors communication skills allow for misinterpretations.....perhaps it was missing important information, or invalid or no evidence to support it......the format could NOT be the reason...where is the shall?

I use VISIO and link to digital video when necessary (a new addition/offering...its awesome). You have even more detail than mine, and my clients have been successfully audited by more than 1 registrar with these as the main procedures and work instructions FOR YEARS...long before process flows became popular as in 9K2k.
I think in flow cahrts...LOL:bigwave:
 
Last edited:

barb butrym

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
a rose by any other name is still a rose, why get tied into nomenclature at all?

Merge the document levels 2, 3. or even 1, 2.... Most do anyway......the only reason auditors go there is 'cause you say so in your system/manual...some elements can be just as easily covered in the manual w/o a detailed procedure...depending on the company..so why create work/duplication (unless there is a shall......of course)
 
#5
Flowcharts for Procedures

I must fully agree with Lucinda (its about time I came around :p ), however (you knew that had to be there) I do want to make a couple of points. First, to some flowcharts are more confusing than narration. That is why I really like the flowchart on one side and the narration on the other. Secondly, I had a client receive a major in 4.5 for having procedures that were only flowcharts. It was not because they did not have enough information, the auditor stated that they were “flowcharts” not procedures. When challenged the registrar stated it was the auditor’s call.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
Admin
#6
Re: Flowcharts for Procedures

db said:

First, to some flowcharts are more confusing than narration. That is why I really like the flowchart on one side and the narration on the other.
I would venture to say the first glance this may be true, but I have never had that experience of flow charts confusing people. Once I explained 1 to them, it was all much better understood (not to mention used) than the former text procedures.

Secondly, I had a client receive a major in 4.5 for having procedures that were only flowcharts. It was not because they did not have enough information, the auditor stated that they were “flowcharts” not procedures. When challenged the registrar stated it was the auditor’s call.
What year was that? I'd have dropped that registrar like a hot potato on the spot. I've used flow charts for years. I was challanged back in 1994 or '95 once - the only time - and they 'came around' and accepted the flow charts. They ARE procedures. To say otherwise is silly. Look up the definition of what a procedure is. A procedure is a way of doing something. There is no "only text documents are procedures" anywhere. I dare you to name the registrar who made that call.
 

Mike S.

Happy to be Alive
Trusted Information Resource
#7
So far I've only used flowcharts along with a text procedure - all in the same document. The flowchart mainly helps to give a quick summary of long procedures, which is often all the user needs (it helps with the "I forget if I'm supposed to do "X" next or "Y" next" kind of questions). If the flowchart is enough, fine, if the user needs more explanation or detail, the text is there, too, to supplement the flowchart.

However, as others have said, I can't understand why a flowchart by itself would be rejected as a valid procedure format simply and only because it was a flowchart.
__________
Quote: Secondly, I had a client receive a major in 4.5 for having procedures that were only flowcharts. It was not because they did not have enough information, the auditor stated that they were “flowcharts” not procedures. When challenged the registrar stated it was the auditor’s call.
__________

If the flowchart text were put into a "normal" written procedure with "typical" step numbering, would that bonehead auditor have accepted it? If so, he/she, IMHO, is a nutcase. There is no logic in that at all that I can see. What am I missing here?

I have a few upcoming procedures/work instructions that I was considering doing as pure flowcharts. I hope that option is still there for me after this thread reaches its end.

Mike S.
 
#8
Re: Flowcharts for Procedures

Marc, I have known situations where the flowchart was issued without any training (not too bright of an idea). If you have no experience in flowcharts, it could seem to be a bit overwhelming. However, I also believe they are easier to train with. Once someone understands flowcharting conventions, future flowcharts will be a lot easier.

On the major, it probably would not be good for me to disclose the name of the company, or the registrar. The company was very upset with us (we suggested using flowcharts). I wanted to suggest a different registrar, but our upper management thought it might be viewed as us trying to pass the buck. Instead, we offered to convert to narrative procedures at no charge, but the company did not want us to do any thing more. After all, we had “done enough damage” already! I do not know if they still have the same registrar (this was a couple of years back).
 
#10
4.5?

Mike S, I agree it really didn't make any sense to me either. Even if flowcharts alone were a problem, you might have a case against 4.2.2 b), but I can't see 4.5! They were controlled properly.

That was part of my argument. But the Management Rep was clearly intimidated by the auditor, and the owner was demanding registration “now”! Once politics entered the picture, nothing else mattered.

BTW, the Management Rep called the registrar with the challenge, he did not formally challenge the n/c.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
H Formats for Master List of Quality Records (MQR) & Document Change Request Form (DCR) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
R Regulations on Controlled Document Size (Paper Size) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
M Document Architecture ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
cgaro62 Using internal audits as part of document reviews Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
J Training on the importance of Document Control Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
Ed Panek External Standards List - Should this document include previously revised standards? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
H Document retention period Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
S Document Notes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
M ISO 13485 and document control for programs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Ed Panek MR Mandate Document EU Medical Device Regulations 1
C Document Index Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
K ASME, ANSI, ASTM and similar specifications and their requirements for document control. Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
H If we use agile - do we still need to document TF as a waterfall just for the notified bodies need? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
B Document Issued with incorrect Document number code Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
J Requirement for Signature on Document Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
J Document Control Metrics Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
A Document Review and Document Approval --- 2 Signatures needed acc. §820.40? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance document to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
I Document Control Software Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
K 25-year lifetime of medical device - document storage period EU Medical Device Regulations 1
J UDI - Where to document it? EU Medical Device Regulations 8
T Controlling Expandable Forms in Paper-Based Document Control System Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S Changing revision status of a reviewed document Manufacturing and Related Processes 11
shimonv Document Control Procedure Header Content Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
Q Document ownerships Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 15
E Document Change Request forms (or no forms)? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
O Any info on release date of FDA “Computer Software Assurance for Manufacturing and Quality System Software” document? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
B Document Approval Matrix Benchmarking Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
J Document Approval Signature Order Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
L How to add exemption or statement to control of document procedure? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M What is the proper way to document measurements Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
P Equipment 21 CFR 820.70(g) - User Requirements Document for Off the shelf equipment 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 7
B Do IFU designs have to be document controlled under ISO 13485? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
C Certificate of Conformance Form - COC for each customer a controlled document? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
R Document Retention - Discard hard-copies after scanning? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
P Mylar plot suppliers in accordance with D6-51991 document AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
A Document Change Notice vs complete System re-write Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
Q Document approval through SharePoint (without signature) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
S What is considered a "core algorithm"? (From an FDA guidance document) Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
U Document Approval - Software company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
O Please, help with document on ISO/ TS 17758 and (IDF 87: 1979). Thank you. Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
I Nitpicking on document released dates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
I Document Control on Log Files ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q Refusal to Document Complaints Customer Complaints 39
Q Tracking Procedure Revisions (Document Control) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
C Document Control Stamps - Does anyone still stamp their documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24

Similar threads

Top Bottom