DoE and ANOVA - 4 factor and 3 levels Taguchi design with 2 replicates

C

cristiano74

#1
Dear listers,
I've a dataset from a 4 factor and 3 levels Taguchi design with 2 replicates.

I'd like to perform an ANOVA to find the interaction between factor.

Could I use ANOVA procedure as it is, or I should follow some other ways?

Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated,thanks

Cristiano.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Re: DoE and ANOVA

You did not make it clear if you are running an L9 or L27 array. Regardless, Taguchi designs are not intended to estimate interactions. You can probably graph the interactions to see if there is anything visually, but your selection of a Resolution III design prohibits the estimation of interactions.
 
C

cristiano74

#3
Re: DoE and ANOVA

Thanks Statistical Steven for your answer.

It' s a L9 with 2 preplications, as you can see in the table below, I suppose. ;)

Now I should display via ANOVA the interacions: my teacher send me this table for homework.


runs A' B' C' D' outcome
1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1075
2 -1 0 0 0 633
3 -1 1 1 1 406
4 0 -1 0 1 860
5 0 0 1 -1 561
6 0 1 -1 0 868
7 1 -1 1 0 669
8 1 0 -1 1 1138
9 1 1 0 -1 749
1' -1 -1 -1 -1 1052
1'' -1 -1 -1 -1 1037


What could I use to solve this problem?

thansk agin for your collaboration.

C.
 

MasterBB

Involved In Discussions
#4
Re: DoE and ANOVA

Cristiano,

Statistical Steven is correct and agree (referring to interaction).
What is the objective of the Response? Is it to hit a Target, Minimize or Maximize.

You can certainly graph the factors & it's interaction (See SS response). Don't recommend.

I am not quite sure why is your teacher is asking for an interaction plot when given a Taguchi array.

See attached (hope this helps)
 

Attachments

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#5
Re: DoE and ANOVA

Regardless, Taguchi designs are not intended to estimate interactions. You can probably graph the interactions to see if there is anything visually, but your selection of a Resolution III design prohibits the estimation of interactions.
This is not quite accurate. In this specific case, you are correct since all four columns were fully utilized with factors. However, Taguchi designs can be used to evaluate specific interactions if they are suspected in advance and planned as part of the design. This interaction must be assigned to the correct column, which then cannot be used for a factor.

Taguchi designs are normally used as screening designs. Confounded relationships can be further explored with higher resolution designs after the numerous non-significant factors have been eliminated.
 
C

cristiano74

#6
Thanks to all, and I dont make my homework because my teacher uses a design to understand the interactions with ANOVA when in fact he does not know what to do?

It often happens when engineers draw the statistics ;)

How can I explain to him that ANOVA is not the best technique in this case?

Thanks again.

C.
 
A

Allattar

#7
Correction.
Taguchi is not the best approach for analysing interactions.
ANOVA is the right approach to the analysis.

Taguchi designs really need to rely on an outer array of noise variables as well, which I cannot see that you have used. Seeing as stability to noise or the environment is what Taguchi is all about, by not testing at two environment levels (ie two columns of response) sort of goes against what you would be using a taguchi design for.

You would be better off with a standard factorial design here, with 2 levels per factor I think. Unless you have a specific reason why you need 3 levels per factor.
If you are fitting only linearity and you have numeric inputs you do not need 3 levels on each factor. You can use a centre points instead to check for curvature.

If you have categorical factors with 3 fixed settings then the 3 level factorial designs can be useful.
There is no point creating a factorial design with 3 levels per factor if your only going for a linear fit on numeric inputs. The standard 2 level factorials give you the simplest and least runs for a design.

If you absolutely have to have more than 2 levels on a factor you can use the choice to select optimal design to tell it which interactions you need and get it to reduce the design from there.

I probably haven't explained this enough, but I am worried that you are diving into Taguchi designs without an appreciation of how you are supposed to use them, and trying to use them for something they are not very good at, eg: finding interactions.

My advice on doe is start with the factorial designs as a base of understanding, then move to look at why and where you might use the others.

I get worried by the buzzword that is Taguchi.
 

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
Re: DoE and ANOVA

This is not quite accurate. In this specific case, you are correct since all four columns were fully utilized with factors. However, Taguchi designs can be used to evaluate specific interactions if they are suspected in advance and planned as part of the design. This interaction must be assigned to the correct column, which then cannot be used for a factor.

Taguchi designs are normally used as screening designs. Confounded relationships can be further explored with higher resolution designs after the numerous non-significant factors have been eliminated.
Miner -

I believe if you use a column of your Taguchi array for the interaction it would have to be the correct column where the interaction is confounded. Typically when this occurs you are not reducing the run total enough to justify its use. For example, assuming the OP was interested in only one ogf the interactions therefore reduced it to a three factor, 3 level design. This is just a 1/3 fractional factorial, so no need to use the Tachugi array per se.

Though, I agree it can be done, I have never seen it applied successfully.
 

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
Correction.
Taguchi is not the best approach for analysing interactions.
ANOVA is the right approach to the analysis.

You would be better off with a standard factorial design here, with 2 levels per factor I think. Unless you have a specific reason why you need 3 levels per factor.
If you are fitting only linearity and you have numeric inputs you do not need 3 levels on each factor. You can use a centre points instead to check for curvature.
Just to add to your excellent response, if you have a four factor, two level study, the full factorial would be 16 runs. A 1/2 fraction would 8 runs. So you can run a single run at the center point.
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#10
Re: DoE and ANOVA

Miner -

I believe if you use a column of your Taguchi array for the interaction it would have to be the correct column where the interaction is confounded. Typically when this occurs you are not reducing the run total enough to justify its use. For example, assuming the OP was interested in only one ogf the interactions therefore reduced it to a three factor, 3 level design. This is just a 1/3 fractional factorial, so no need to use the Tachugi array per se.

Though, I agree it can be done, I have never seen it applied successfully.
You are correct about reserving the column where the confounding occurs. I did not claim that it was efficient, but in my earlier days when Taguchi was new, I have successfully used the approach many times. Now I have learned to do the same things in a more efficient manner.

For example, Box has shown how the inner and outer array approach can be done more efficiently using a Split-plot design. We learn new things. It does not make the old way wrong, just less efficient.

Before computers made the calculations easy, Taguchi's approach was great, because the math was easy. I date back to those days. I had to perform the calculations by hand for years before getting one of the first IBM PCs (pre-XT). That was his intent.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
H Taguchi mixed model DoE [L16 (4^3 2^6): factors interaction and ANOVA calculation Using Minitab Software 3
V Identifying Significant Factors - Regression Analysis vs Correlation vs ANOVA vs DOE Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 7
S Asterisk in DOE minitab software Using Minitab Software 23
J Selecting factors for screening DoE design Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
J Including Repeats in DoE using Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
J DoE - Number of runs in Plackett-Burman (Minitab) Using Minitab Software 2
J DoE (Design of Experiments) - Multiple responses with different factors Using Minitab Software 2
K Power point training slides on DOE (Design of Experiments) Wanted Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
I DOE: High variance and small effects in Minitab Using Minitab Software 1
M I have 3 different factors - DOE help Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
N Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE? Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 9
V Screening DOE with 7 Input factors and 4 responses - Significant factors Using Minitab Software 1
R Is there any Excel .xls Spreadsheet available for DOE with 3 factors? Six Sigma 1
N DOE (design of experiments) in Minitab 16 Using Minitab Software 6
D Interpretation of DOE interaction plot Using Minitab Software 8
D Minitab - Design combinations (DOE) Using Minitab Software 4
C DOE - How to determine optimal settings and transposing data Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
N 3 factor - 3 level experiment with DoE and Minitab Using Minitab Software 10
M DOE: Significant factor or not Using Minitab Software 2
P When can we apply DOE (Design of Experiments)? Six Sigma 8
S DOE Analysis - Experiments with 5 Factors Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
R [Minitab] DOE Output vs. Actual Data Using Minitab Software 6
S Blocking In a DOE Six Sigma 1
P Screening DOE: A coming up headache story Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 4
Y Please help me solve a DOE problem - New Minitab User Using Minitab Software 36
P Cyclic Effect Factoring in DOE (Design of Experiments) Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
V Analysing Results after DOE Using Minitab Software 1
V Analysis of DOE Results and Model Finalization Using Minitab Software 4
J How to Estimate the Number of Replicates on a DOE (Design of Experiments) Six Sigma 5
R 4 Factors 3 Level DOE to determine which factors are significant Using Minitab Software 2
K Minitab Lack-of-Fit Test in DOE (Design of Experiments) Using Minitab Software 4
M Injection Moulding Minitab DOE - All P Values are 0 Using Minitab Software 7
G Setting up a 3 Factor, 2 Level,2 response DOE in Minitab Using Minitab Software 7
Z A DOE in Minitab - 3 factors and 3 levels for each factor Using Minitab Software 12
M Taguchi L4 Orthogonal Array Design of Experiments (DOE) in an Excel spreadsheet Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 3
V Linking the FMEA Causes & Action Plan with DOE Experiments or Experimentation Design FMEA and Control Plans 1
B DOE Question: 3 factors with 2 levels and 1 factor with 3 levels Six Sigma 2
Z Help with running 3 factor DOE factor optimization Using Minitab Software 2
H Minitab DOE Analysis of Data and Transforming Using Minitab Software 4
P Help Setting Up and Analyzing 3 Factor 2 Level Full Factorial Design for DOE Using Minitab Software 3
B Taguchi DOE (Design of Experiments) example using Minitab Using Minitab Software 3
C 3 Factor DOE (Design of Experiments) Template Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
P How to analyze DOE: 2 Factor, 4 Level Experiment Six Sigma 7
J DOE Analysis Experiment, 5 factors, 4 factors having 3 levels, and 1 factor having 5 Using Minitab Software 38
B Analyze 'Factorial Design' or 'Variability' - Difference when used for DOE Analysis? Using Minitab Software 1
L DOE (Design of Experiments) suggestions Using Minitab Software 7
L DOE (Design of Experiments) - Analyse Variation with Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
E 5^2 DOE (Design of Experiments) with 3 Replications, 5 Levels 2 Factors Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
T DOE Multi level Taguchi - I am doing a Capstone Project Using Minitab Software 10
R To Find Out Second Order Model from First Order Factorial Design (DOE) Using Minitab Software 9

Similar threads

Top Bottom