SBS - The best value in QMS software

Does anyone know anything about "Take Charge Program" from the US?

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
#12
Seems like another horrible example of a fool with power learning a "catch phrase" and then trying to apply it to everything. Very much like a lot of folks with "kaizen" or my grandson with a hammer - everything looks like a nail to him when he has a hammer in his hand.

Sometimes I rue the day we folks at ASQ agreed to change the name of the former "Advanced Manufacturing Interest Group" to the "Lean Division" - we sure picked up a lot of unnecessary baggage by linking with the fringe crazies who think Lean is ONLY a bunch of amateurs running around like decapitated chickens in the name of "kaizen."
 
M

MikeL

#13
Where's my pistol?

My client's QM tells me that everything has gone really quiet about the "take charge" program.

One thing they did was to have big meetings at the beginning that raised everyones expectations.

Now they are having trouble delivering.

Cynicism levels are rising and I fear that paralysis will shortly set in.

No doubt there will be a big write up on some web site about yet another successful take charge program as it draws to an end.
 

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
#14
Re: Where's my pistol?

My client's QM tells me that everything has gone really quiet about the "take charge" program.

One thing they did was to have big meetings at the beginning that raised everyones expectations.

Now they are having trouble delivering.

Cynicism levels are rising and I fear that paralysis will shortly set in.

No doubt there will be a big write up on some web site about yet another successful take charge program as it draws to an end.
MikeL,

Is "They" the consulting company? Or is "They" your Client?
What company sells the "Take Charge" program?

Stijloor.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration with a Mask on...
Staff member
Admin
#18
It is actually known as the 'take charge! initiative', an employee empowerment program. Not much information are available but you may like to look at this press release.
From the press release:
Exide Technologies said:
Exide Announces Expectations for Third Quarter FY 2006 and Provides Update on Take Charge! Initiative

ALPHARETTA, Ga.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 21, 2005--Exide Technologies (NASDAQ: XIDE)(www.exide.com), a global leader in stored electrical-energy solutions, today announced its expectations for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 ending December 31, 2005.

Current indications are that the Company will fall short of meeting the results from the same quarter a year ago primarily due to lower Transportation sales in Europe and the most recent spike in lead prices. The quarter-over-quarter comparison is also negatively impacted by insurance proceeds in the prior-year quarter related to property damage in one of the Company's German facilities as well as the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange in the current quarter of approximately $2 million.

The Company still expects to comply with its bank covenants as calculated through the third quarter of fiscal 2006.

Take Charge! Update

The Company also announced that it provided a progress report on its Take Charge! initiative during a meeting with employees on Monday.

The Company has been working with Proudfoot Consulting since September to implement the Take Charge! initiative, which is designed to empower teams of employees to identify opportunities to eliminate wasteful practices, reduce variability and cut costs in all aspects of the business. This initiative - which to date is being implemented in three North American smelters, four manufacturing plants in North America and Europe, and one corporate administrative function - "is intended to accelerate and build on the momentum of our successful EXCELL lean program," said Exide President and CEO Gordon A. Ulsh.

The Take Charge! initiative was launched following an assessment of the business, which identified a number of quick payback projects that would require minimal capital investment.

"I have told our employees that I can think of no other initiative that has as great an opportunity to deliver rapid improvements to our business and have the potential for a significant impact on our bottom line," Mr. Ulsh said. "As liquidity allows, we will continue to invest in this initiative, which we believe after reviewing a Proudfoot Consulting analysis could ultimately result in a cost savings of as much as $100 million on an annual basis if fully and successfully implemented. While we cannot guarantee such cost savings, we are excited about the potential of Take Charge! and the early progress that we have seen."

During the first few months of the initiative, Exide's manufacturing plants in Bristol, Tennessee, and Salina, Kansas, have experienced improved battery production and reduced scrap and downtime. Similarly, the Company's smelters in Vernon, California, and Frisco, Texas, have increased their weekly lead production and reduced the percentage of impurities that must be removed from lead during the recycling process.

About Exide Technologies

Exide Technologies, with operations in 89 countries, is one of the world's largest producers and recyclers of lead-acid batteries. The Company's four global business groups - Transportation Americas, Transportation Europe and Rest of World, Industrial Energy Americas and Industrial Energy Europe and Rest of World - provide a comprehensive range of stored electrical energy products and services for industrial and transportation applications.

Transportation markets include original-equipment and aftermarket automotive, heavy-duty truck, agricultural and marine applications, and new technologies for hybrid vehicles and 42-volt automotive applications. Industrial markets include network power applications such as telecommunications systems, electric utilities, railroads, photovoltaic (solar-power related) and uninterruptible power supply (UPS), and motive-power applications including lift trucks, mining and other commercial vehicles.

Further information about Exide, including its financial results, are available at www.exide.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

Except for historical information, this press release may be deemed to contain "forward-looking" statements. The Company desires to avail itself of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") and is including this cautionary statement for the express purpose of availing itself of the protection afforded by the Act.

Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to (a) projections of revenues, cost of raw materials, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, capital expenditures, growth prospects, dividends, the effect of currency translations, capital structure and other financial items, (b) statements of plans of and objectives of the Company or its management or Board of Directors, including the introduction of new products, or estimates or predictions of actions by customers, suppliers, competitors or regulating authorities, (c) statements of future economic performance, (d) statements of assumptions, such as the prevailing weather conditions in the Company's market areas, underlying other statements and statements about the Company or its business and (e) statements regarding the ability to comply with or alternatively obtain amendments under the Company's debt agreements.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following general factors such as: (i) adverse reactions by creditors, vendors, customers, and others to the going-concern modification in the Company's audit report for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, (ii) the Company's ability to implement and fund based on current liquidity business strategies and restructuring plans, (iii) unseasonable weather (warm winters and cool summers) which adversely affects demand for automotive and some industrial batteries, (iv) the Company's substantial debt and debt service requirements which may restrict the Company's operational and financial flexibility, as well as imposing significant interest and financing costs (v) the Company's ability to comply with the covenants in its debt agreements or obtain waivers of noncompliance, (vi) the litigation proceedings to which the Company is subject, the results of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its business, (vii) the realization of the tax benefits of the Company's net operating loss carry forwards, of which is dependent upon future taxable income, (viii) the fact that lead, a major constituent in most of the Company's products, experiences significant fluctuations in market price and is a hazardous material that may give rise to costly environmental and safety claims, (ix) competitiveness of the battery markets in North America and Europe, (x) the substantial management time and financial and other resources needed for the Company's consolidation and rationalization of acquired entities, (xi) risks involved in foreign operations such as disruption of markets, changes in import and export laws, currency restrictions, currency exchange rate fluctuations and possible terrorist attacks against U.S. interests, (xii) the Company's exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on its variable debt, (xiii) the Company's ability to maintain and generate liquidity to meet its operating needs, (xiv) general economic conditions, (xv) the ability to acquire goods and services and/or fulfill labor needs at budgeted costs, (xvi) the Company's reliance on a single supplier for its polyethylene battery separators, and (xvii) the Company's ability to comply with the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Therefore, the Company cautions each reader of this press release carefully to consider those factors set forth above and those factors described in its most recent Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2005 and Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on September 14, 2005, because such factors have, in some instances, affected and in the future could affect, the ability of the Company to achieve its projected results and may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed herein.

CONTACT: Exide Technologies
Media Contact
Alan Chapple, 678-566-9514
[email protected]
or
Investor Contact
Rich Cockrell, 678-566-9415
[email protected]

SOURCE: Exide Technologies
"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this press release regarding Exide's business which are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" that involve risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the most recently ended fiscal year.
 
M

MikeL

#19
All's quiet on the management front

September and "take charge" program is dead and buried in Australia (my words).

It would have been interesting to find out how much it cost, don't suppose I will be told.

I don't blame Proudfoot for not delivering all they promised as I believe top management effectively kybosh most programs like this by not being part of it.

It ws interesting to read the comments from the Exide US site. We are going to save $100m except please read disclaimer.

Why is it the companies who decide to go down the TQM road start with a press release of how many millions they expect to save.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C Does anyone know anything about the Mitutoyo MACH V CMM? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
Colin Does anyone know anything about Saudi Arabian Certification Registrars and Notified Bodies 4
T The air kerma measuring device - Does anyone know anything about it? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
I Does anyone have anything about ISO 19000 standard family? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
D Ppm - Does anyone have anything good on ppm philosophy? Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 10
N Does anyone use SGS for ISO 13485 / CE certification Registrars and Notified Bodies 0
U Does *anyone* know a lab that will test to EN 455-4 Medical Gloves shelf life determination? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
N Does anyone have experience of GB/T 34986-2017? China Medical Device Regulations 1
Z Does anyone have experience with EN ISO 17664 ? IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 9
F Does anyone have an ESD quality/cooler talk to share? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
A Does anyone have a checklist of API Spec 650 13th Edition? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
P Does anyone have a API Q1 Documentation Package? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
J Does anyone have an excel IATF 16949 Internal Audit checklist I could use? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
C Document Control Stamps - Does anyone still stamp their documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24
MDD_QNA QR Code Standard ISO/IEC 15417:2007 - Does anyone use it? Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
W Does anyone have an API Q2 checklist for internal auditing? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1
GreatNate Metrotom - Does anyone have any exposure to the Zeiss Metrotom 800 or 1500? Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
M Honda Audits - Does anyone have any experience with the QAV audit? General Auditing Discussions 3
Q Does anyone have experience implementing a QMS without ISO certification? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 2
J Does anyone here use ISOXpress/IMSXpress QMS software? Software Quality Assurance 11
K Does anyone have a copy of a GM 5 Phase Problem solving form Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 1
M Does anyone has a good verification and validation plan template? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
B Does anyone charge for annual layouts? APQP and PPAP 8
N Does anyone know a registrar that offers both ISO 9001 and ISO 17020? Registrars and Notified Bodies 6
W Does anyone have any experience with the Easy Metric System? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J Does anyone have a good APQP template that meets IATF requirements? APQP and PPAP 3
D IATF 16949 - 8.5.2.1 Traceability Plan - Does anyone have an example? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
C Does anyone have an AS9100:2015 audit schedule template? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
R Does anyone have example test report of defibrillator IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
G Definition Parallel Loop - Does anyone know what the term Parallel loop means? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 2
B Does Anyone utilize MS Outlook Read Receipts ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
L Does anyone know what is going on in DQS? Registrars and Notified Bodies 1
P Scope Document - Does anyone happen to have an Example Scope Document (4.3)? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
A Does anyone have a comparison between ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D Does anyone have a list of the IATF "Shalls" they would be willing to share? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S Plant within a Plant - Does anyone currently manage their facility this way? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
E Does anyone have experience implementing a Tiered QMS? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
J Does anyone have an example Authority Listing SOP example? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
S Does anyone know what a healthcare GDSN data pool actually looks like? Hospitals, Clinics & other Health Care Providers 2
R Does anyone have any experience on change control? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
ScottK Does anyone have experience with how MDD unanounced audits of suppliers are going? EU Medical Device Regulations 21
A Does anyone have experience providing a summary of Pre-IDE discussions in the 510k US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
S Does anyone use the Boeing STP0565 and STP0637 specs? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
M Does anyone have a breakup of Establishments based on Device Classes ? Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
R Legal Register - Does anyone have an example of a legal register? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
A MDS software - Does anyone have experience with iPoint? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 8
P Does anyone have a DFMEA process Interface Matrix .xls template FMEA and Control Plans 7
S Does anyone know about FIAT Normation N.9.91320/02 ? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
M Does anyone here have experience implementing PCI DSS (Data Security Standard) IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 10
R Does anyone know why the TC 176 website has been hijacked by CSA? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom