Does every nonconformance require a corrective action?

W

Wendy

#1
Addressing nonconformances

Does every nonconformance require a corrective action? Such as every data entry error?

If yes, can you offer some suggestions on how to handle types like these?

If not, what is a good way to document the fact that you looked at the nonconformance and decided it was not practical to address it?

Can anyone recommend a place to go to get ideas for a good Corrective action system, that isn't frowned upon by all employees?

Thanks.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
R

Roger Eastin

#2
Wow, there is a lot of information in this forum on that question!! I would suggest that you do a search on CAs for the various responses. The basic answer, though, to your first question is no. You don't need a CA for every nonconformance, as the standard states that your decision about this should be based on the risk involved with the nonconformance. However, before I answer anymore, do a search and I think you'll find what you're looking for.
 
J

Jim Triller

#3
Not every "nonconformance" requires a specific corrective action, at least not with the registrars I have worked with. Consider the (potential) impact of the nonconformance on the customer and on the financial well being of your organization. If it does make sense (perhaps according to managerial judgment) take immediate action.

Where it doesn't make business sense to take immediate action trending may be used. I recommend using a "tally sheet" for capturing the less significant nonconformances and then periodically analyzing the data using some of the basic quality tools (Pareto analysis, cost/benefit analysis, root cause analysis, etc.). Then, based on this analysis, perform a corrective action to resolve what is determined to be the most pressing problem. I have found this approach to work well.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
#4
From: ISO 9000 Standards Discussion
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:24:57 -0600
Subject: Re: Q: Nonconformances /Maseman/Andrews

From: eandrews

>From: "Wendy Maseman"
>
>Does every nonconformance require a corrective action? Such as
>every data entry error? If yes, can you offer some suggestions
>on how to handle them?
>
>If not, how do address the fact that you looked at the
>nonconformance and decided it was not practical to address it?
>
>Is there a web site that would help with setting up a good
>corrective action system?
>
>Any help would be welcomed.
>
>-Wendy Maseman

Wendy,

NO - every nonconformance does NOT require a corrective action. If a system is established that requires a corrective action for EVERY nonconformance, that system is soon bogged down with investigations, corrective action requests, etc. for a large number of INSIGNIFICANT happenings. Save the corrective actions for the SIGNIFICANT items. Determination of what is SIGNIFICANT is entirely up to you and your organization. It can be based on impact to product quality, safety, customer satisfaction, bottom line, undesirable trends, etc. or anything else that YOU decide. If corrective actions (and all that they entail) are reserved for REAL problems then they will get the attention and resources that they deserve.

My thoughts - hope it's helpful,

Ethan Andrews

***********************************

From: ISO 9000 Standards Discussion
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:28:52 -0600
Subject: Re: Q: Nonconformances /Maseman/Blair

From: GrantBlair

A single data entry level would not be a nonconformance. If there are a number of data entry errors, then it is reasonable to assume there is a root cause for all the errors, for example, incomplete or confusing work instructions. Rewriting the work instructions would address the root cause, merely correcting the data errors would not. If not, how do address the fact that you looked at the nonconformance and decided it was not practical to address it?

An example that comes to mind would be to find a single error on an internal audit, e.g. a control chart with points out of control. The auditor could request in the nonconformance an examination of a additional charts to see if there was a more extensive problem. If no such pattern was found, then it would be reasonable to document this and close the NCR.

Grant Blair

***********************************

From: ISO 9000 Standards Discussion
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:31:22 -0600
Subject: Re: Q: Nonconformances /Maseman

From: TBliven

The ISO model addresses this topic in section 4.14, allowing for corrective action appropriate to the nonconformance. It would seem prudent to expend resources where effectiveness is maximized. Isolated or sporadic errors on a manual process such as data entry are going to happen. The cost to eliminate the errors may not be in line with the value of the task.

Tom Bliven

*************************************

From: ISO 9000 Standards Discussion
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:35:25 -0600
Subject: Re: Nonconformances /Maseman/venkatasamy

From: "venkatasamy.v"

The ISO 9001:1994 says:

"Any corrective or preventive action taken to eliminate the causes of actual or potential non conformities shall be to a degree appropriate to the magnitude of problems and commensurate with the risks encountered"

So, the idea is to "attack the vital few, and hold the trivial many". What you need is the analysis, to classify the non conformances as "Vital" or "trivial". i.e) it is not required to have a CA for every non-conformance, provided you have proper analysis (magnitude/risk).

The data entry error in a transaction processing system, may not be vital, since you can validate it subsequently and also the effect may not be significant. How ever you find these errors quite often, it could be a chronic situation which may require a CA

However in automated production centers, any data entry error will be vital, since it could lead to rejection of the output and a CA also PA may be a must.

One method I follow is to classify the nonconformance as follows:
V - vital
E - essential
D - desirable

V will qualify for a CA & PA
E will qualify for a CA

D is further indexed as Sporadic and Chronic (that means such occurrences need to be analysed over a period of time) and a chronic D will qualify for CA, and for a sporadic D, there are no CAs, (atleast immediately)

This you need to spellout in your procedure

Regards

Venkatasamy

******************************

From: ISO 9000 Standards Discussion
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:38:42 -0600
Subject: Re: Nonconformances /Maseman/Bartschenfeld

From: "Bob Bartschenfeld"

We log every occurrence in which product was dispositioned (ie, scrapped, reworked, returned from customer). The Quality Manager assigns a responsibility to determine the root cause, if possible. If the root cause is systemic, we require a corrective action. If it appears not to be systemic, the responsible Manager may state that and the CAR is closed out. This allows us to track root causes as well as symptoms of nonconformances (we have a lot). We use an intranet database for the tracking.

Bob Bartschenfeld
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
#5
Also see:

http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000016.html
http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000330.html
http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000036.html

Edited 2 January 2002

I can't re-lookup and change every old link to posts in the old forums. Most of them *should* still be there. If you want to find the post in the New forums, if the link to the thread in the old forums works (most of them should...), look at the thread (topic) title and what forum it is in. Then back here in the New forums - go to that forum and look for the thread topic title - OR - do a Search for the key words from Title (Note - you can search entire threads or just the 'subject' or 'title' - if you look in the Forums search page you'll see the options.

Call me lazy...
:rolleyes:
 
J

jdkilp

#6
You already have a number of very good answers to your question, but keep in mind that all Registrars are not created equally. Be sure to ask your Registrar the question. Although we all agree here that a single data entry error is not a nonconformance, you registrar might disagree with this - we're all unique.

If your registrar makes a big deal about it, you can get around it by stating specifically in your documentation system something to the effect that "...single data entries are not considered nonconformances..."

Jerry

------------------
Jerry Kilpatrick & Associates
Fax: 413-556-5711
[email protected]
 
D

Darrell Wenrich

#7
Actually, Auditors that have been involved with describe the approach of applying C/A to every issue is found to be what many have termed a "knee jerk" reaction. I agree with the earlier comment that a tally sheet can be used for tracking Non-Conformances.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
G Does ISO9001 require every nonconformance to have a root cause analysis? Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 21
K Does every Nonconformance Require a Corrective Action? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 8
A Issuing Countermeasure Report - Does every nonconformance identified require an NCR? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
D Change Approval Requirements - Does every change need formal customer approval? Design and Development of Products and Processes 17
C ISO 13485 :2016 - CAPA - Does every CAPA need to be checked by regulations? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
D Does every piece of equipment used in a laboratory need to have an IQ protocol written and executed? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
E Does every metallic part have to be protectively earthed (class I ME)? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
L Does every document on a project require a document number? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
C Does every procedure need to be included within a policy? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
J Does Every Staff need to read the ISO9001 Quality Manual from Cover to Cover? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
Q Does 21 CFR 820 really revise every year? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
Q Does every Process Control listed in FMEA have to be listed in the Control Plan FMEA and Control Plans 4
L 8.2.4.2 First Article Inspection - Does every new part that is run require a FAIR AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 13
C Does every PMA part have to have an 8130 form? Or compliance with part 21.303? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 4
C Does all gauges mean every gage? Manufacturing Engineering (Paragraph 7.6.2) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
G Does ISO 9001 require a procedure for every part of the business? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
S TS 16949 Compliant Control Plans - Does every item need a record? FMEA and Control Plans 5
D Certified shipment does it mean every part has to be checked 100%? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 12
D Does every company or employee owned gage have to be calibrated? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
D Following AS9102 for FAI Requirements - Does EVERY Component Need Its Own FAI? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 40
R Does anyone know how ASQ exam requirements are verified? Professional Certifications and Degrees 3
P Does cybersecurity apply to my product? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Q Does a gage used for a visual verification need to be calibrated? Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
M Does any one know if company is allowed to submit appeal for rejected registration file Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
B Does TUS require load thermocouples? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
B Does anyone copyright their internal QMS documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24
D MDR technical file: does it need to contain duplicates of controlled documents EU Medical Device Regulations 2
D Does the MDR article 10 (14) needs to be documented word for word in a Procedure? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Why does GAGEpack drop the temperature and humidity readings out of the verification event card? Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 0
C Determining an as received OOT condition during calibration does not affect measurements taken prior to calibration. General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 16
D Does the DoC require a technical documentation version? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
S Local (country) registration of medical devices - Who does it in best case? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
G When does containment event not require 100% sort? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
H Does this clause mean i must be in compliance with AS9100 or is 9001 enough? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
H Does ISO state in anyway that we MUST keep physical first piece parts? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
XRAY_3121 Class II heating pad - does the power supply have to have IEC 60601-1 testing?? US Medical Device Regulations 5
F Change in address for critical supplier - does NB need to be informed? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 20
S Brexit ISO 13485:2016 + Corrigendum - What does a UKCA DoC require? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
G Does anyone know about tobacco-free nicotine pouches? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
cgaro62 Does FDA apply to a non-medical 13485 certified custom manufacturing company? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
R Does anyone use iQMS for their ISO based document control? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
V How many hrs does it take to create a Technical File (TD)? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M How does FDA determine OAI and VAI after inspection? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
G Does TPI agencies comes under outsourced process as per Q1 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 11
N FPY requested for an industry that does not have rework IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
William55401 21 CFR 11 Password Aging - What does "periodically" revised mean in your org? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
I CQI-15 Welding System Assessment 2nd edition - Does not require Ultrasonic Welding anymore? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
Ajit Basrur Does "Refurbishment" fall under "Service"? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
T Does marketing company require CE mark if manufacturer has CE mark on product? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Watchcat REGULATORY WATCHCAT De Novo Post-Mortem 6 – How Does This Even Happen? Other US Medical Device Regulations 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom