OK, Newsflash! It doesn't matter what you call it or how it's formatted, all that matters is whether or not the minimum requirments are documented and you can show planning and fulfillment of them.
Now with that whatever it is you provided, I'll lay odds that the least paid, least important person in your company would lack "competent awareness" of the policy (meaning every bit of it), could not explain it and many of your leadership would fail the test as well.
You gave a business plan, not a policy, and every single word of it is now auditable and your feet are now cast in very fast setting cement.
My
Now with that whatever it is you provided, I'll lay odds that the least paid, least important person in your company would lack "competent awareness" of the policy (meaning every bit of it), could not explain it and many of your leadership would fail the test as well.
You gave a business plan, not a policy, and every single word of it is now auditable and your feet are now cast in very fast setting cement.
My
with my two penn'orth! 
There is a general point that the policy has to address all the requirements laid out in clause 5.1 / 5.2, that is a given. The policy also has to be consistent with all the other strategy and leadership requirements dotted through ISO 9001 like in 6.2.1 a, and 7.3.
In answer to the question about tense used in the standard you can use current or future. The purpose of a policy statement is to have a 'line in the sand' to establish expectations for how the organisation will operate and it can be used by interested parties to test actual practice against stated policy.
Hope this helps.
