Does there always have to be a "correction?"

M

MrOctober

#1
I'm going through some RCA from a recent AS9100 audit.

They are requiring that I submit "corrections."

I've submitted the corrective actions and the root causes and all were accepted. There were no high risk findings just small procedural changes that did not require any containment action and had no effect on end product and did not effect our customers. I ended up having to remove or reword some clauses from our QMS system that painted ourselves in a corner for being too specific. The clauses were too specific in that they were required by our QMS system but not practiced because it was non value added essentially. The clauses also made it almost impossible to comply because they were written when our company was a lot smaller and we've nearly tripled in size since then. So the changes were just procedural and documentation.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
M

MrOctober

#3
Howste,

Is that not also the CA? That is what I did submit for the CA and it was accepted.

Is it possible for the CA to be the same as the correction?

Is there any instance where an NCR may not require a Correction? How would I go about defending the lack of action?
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#4
As Howste mentioned, what you did was a correction.

For a CA, you would have to ask "why clauses too specific that were required by our QMS system but not practiced because it was non value added essentially. and also made it almost impossible to comply" were there?

If the answer (root cause) was something like "the guy writing the procedure did not understand the requirements", you CA might be: make sure that anyone writing the procedure understood the requirements, probably including some specific additional competence requirements.

In your case, you already mentioned that they "were written when our company was a lot smaller and we've nearly tripled in size since then", so it seems that, with this root cause, there's nothing reasonable you can do, so you might have decided an escalation to CA was not required.

On the other hand, another possible conclusion would be that the root cause was that you did not revise your procedures to match your company "size" when it grew, so a CA would be to include a requirement in your system to revise all your procedures when you company triples its size (just a generic example using your comment).

Is it possible for the CA to be the same as the correction?
No.

Is there any instance where an NCR may not require a Correction? How would I go about defending the lack of action?
A NC requires an action, a correction is one of the possible actions. Another possible action is segregation, or concession.
 

mihzago

Trusted Information Resource
#5
my opinion differs from howste and Marcelo, and I'm in agreement with Mr. October's assessment.

you can't do a correction to a process or a procedure. you can only correct a record. Correction is something you can do there and then. For example, a record was missing a required signature, a correction would be to have the appropriate individual review and sign the document at the time it was identified.

Marcelo wrote: "For the CA, you would have to ask..." - You don't ask anything for the CA, you first define the problem and identify the root cause. Then you ask what action is necessary.
Mr. October determined that the requirements defined in the procedure are no longer applicable because the company has evolved. The actual root cause may be that the procedure has not been periodically reviewed. So the corrective action, similar to what Marcelo has suggested, would be to update the procedure/process, and address the periodic review issue (e.g. update doc control procedure, training, etc.).
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#6
you can't do a correction to a process or a procedure. you can only correct a record. Correction is something you can do there and then. For example, a record was missing a required signature, a correction would be to have the appropriate individual review and sign the document at the time it was identified.
Correction is defined as as action to eliminate an identified non conformity. So it can be applied to any non conformity. For example, if you cut a part in a large size than intended, a correction can be to cut it a little more for it to be in compliance (this would also be a rework, in fact).

Marcelo wrote: "For the CA, you would have to ask..." - You don't ask anything for the CA, you first define the problem and identify the root cause. Then you ask what action is necessary.
I meant to ask "..If you want to arrive in a CA..", but thanks for the correction!
 
Last edited:

howste

Thaumaturge
Trusted Information Resource
#7
Let's look at the definitions of the terms used in AS9100, which are contained in ISO 9000:
Correction - action to eliminate a detected nonconformity
Corrective Action - action to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity or other undesirable situation
The correction removes the nonconformity, and the corrective action removes the cause of the nonconformity and will prevent recurrence.

By changing the requirements in the documentation, the nonconforming condition no longer exists, so it's a correction.

To decide the corrective action(s), the cause of the nonconformity needs to be determined. If changing the documentation would prevent a similar situation from happening in the future, then it might also be considered a corrective action. Usually the correction and corrective action are different. Marcelo has given some good guidance.
 
Last edited:
M

MrOctober

#8
Correction - action to eliminate a detected nonconformity
I would almost have to say then that our corrective action and correction are one in the same. I corrected the procedure to lessen the strain on our QMS but at the same time, it also will eliminate the NC from happening ever again. So, with our old procedure we did not comply with what we said we did/do. I modified it, we comply again and the way it was rewritten it wont happen again (I literally removed the requirement).
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#9
I corrected the procedure to lessen the strain on our QMS but at the same time, it also will eliminate the NC from happening ever again. So, with our old procedure we did not comply with what we said we did/do. I modified it, we comply again and the way it was rewritten it wont happen again (I literally removed the requirement).
How does correction of one procedure prevents the problem (to have non-value added and impossible to comply clauses on your QMS) from happening again?

What you did corrected the particular instance of the NC in that procedure, but unless you revise all procedures to check if the same problem happened, and also define a corrective action such as requiring a review of all your procedures when your company grows, or something like that, the problem will happen again.

What you are focusing at (and unfortunately most people do) is on the particular instance of a NC (symptom), instead of seeing the NC as a whole (which is is related to the root cause).
 

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#10
Quote:
Is it possible for the CA to be the same as the correction?
No.

I would almost have to say then that our corrective action and correction are one in the same.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The difference is subtle, and Marcelo is referencing the difference but not actually saying it...

Something CAUSED a non-conformance SITUATION.

Changing the wording of the document addresses the situation.
This is a correction of the current situation, but does nothing to prohibit it from happening again tomorrow.

Establishing/determining the root cause, and taking action to prohibit recurrence is your Corrective Action.

These are not the same thing...one handles the situation, the other handles the cause.

One is situational, the other is systemic...you need both (though I would handle both under a single CA to save time and paper).

HTH
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M FDA 21 CFR 820.250 - Does "valid statistical" always mean math? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
R Does IVD 510k application always goes to pre-IDE and IDE process? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
H Does a Nonconforming Material Report always generate a Corrective Action? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
G Does anyone know about tobacco-free nicotine pouches? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
cgaro62 Does FDA apply to a non-medical 13485 certified custom manufacturing company? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
R Does anyone use iQMS for their ISO based document control? Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
V How many hrs does it take to create a Technical File (TD)? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M How does FDA determine OAI and VAI after inspection? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
G Does TPI agencies comes under outsourced process as per Q1 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 11
N FPY requested for an industry that does not have rework IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
William55401 21 CFR 11 Password Aging - What does "periodically" revised mean in your org? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
I CQI-15 Welding System Assessment 2nd edition - Does not require Ultrasonic Welding anymore? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
Ajit Basrur Does "Refurbishment" fall under "Service"? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
T Does marketing company require CE mark if manufacturer has CE mark on product? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Watchcat REGULATORY WATCHCAT De Novo Post-Mortem 6 – How Does This Even Happen? Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
T What does VW mean by annual requalification? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
I Does BSI require suppliers to be ISO 9001 Certified? EU Medical Device Regulations 12
Watchcat Does Regulatory Affairs put the "no" in innovation? Other US Medical Device Regulations 14
Q Does anyone know what this call out means? Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
K COPLANARITY: Composite profile tolerance on multiple surfaces- what does" lower dimensional reference frame tolerance" control? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 11
P Does FDA require certification for quality system internal audit for auditor? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
H Does anyone has feedback on a notified body for small companies? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
M Does 4.5 - Alternative RISK CONTROL apply to the Particular Standards? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
E Does IVD need to integrate with hospital IT infrastructure? Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 2
D What does a level 1 (PSW) PPAP actually promise? APQP and PPAP 19
R GS1 DataMatrix code does not meet GS1 Specification EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M Does the scope of ISO 9001:2015 applies to tenders, pricing and sales department of a medical devices distributor? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
K Why does load cell supplier requires force verification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
M Does C=0 strictly mean 1 bad, all bad, all the time? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C Does a medical device active (zinc oxide) needs BPR registration in EU? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 6
D Does Risk Management apply to re-labeler (MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Ed Panek Does this FDA Requirement Apply to international (not USA) distributors for USA based manufacturing companies? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
S Does anyone have a checklist to prepare for ISO 13485, Stage I audit? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Does a refurbished product required a new UDI? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
D Change to labelling - does it require a new 510(k)? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
M What does "constantly" mean ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
N Does anyone use SGS for ISO 13485 / CE certification Registrars and Notified Bodies 0
G Does FDA allows remote approvals of quality documentation. Is there any specific guidance on signing any quality records remotely? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
B Does FDA Registration QSR need to cover non-medical devices for contract repackager? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
lanley liao Does all of the suppliers need to integrated into the supplier list qualified of the company? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
0 To which part of 13485 does this refer? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A Medical Device Contract Manufacturer - Does the CM need to register with FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
J Records Control - Does each individual record need to be numbered? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 2
lanley liao Does the customer`s trademark belong to customer-supplied property? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
H How does a gas turbine work on diesel fuel? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 12
G What does performance specification include? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
W Where does a coatings and paint company fall in IATF? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
A How much does a complete biocompatibility test package cost? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
B Does anybody know how to get older versions of Minitab to work in Windows 10? Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 9
M Does the ISO 9001:2015 standard require a disaster recovery plan or emergency response plan ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16

Similar threads

Top Bottom