I’m looking for clarification on how to properly handle ring/plug gages that fail verification for their marked class, but still meet the requirements for a lower class.
In our situation, a ring gage failed calibration for the class stamped on the tool. The calibration certificate is marked as failed for Class XX. The measurement data shows the gage would meet Class X limits. Both Class XX and Class X exceed our internal tolerance requirements.
We’re considering downgrading the gage from Class XX to Class X instead of scrapping it.
Since the certificate already contains the measurement data demonstrating that the gage meets Class X limits, can we rely on that existing certificate and update our log to reflect a Class X designation, even though the certificate shows a fail for Class XX?
Or, do we need to send the gage back for a new calibration performed specifically to Class X so that the certificate cleanly reflects the new class, with no failure listed?
I want to ensure our approach is ISO 9001 compliant and avoids traceability concerns during an audit.
Has anyone dealt with this before, and how did you handle the documentation?
Thanks in advance for your insight!
In our situation, a ring gage failed calibration for the class stamped on the tool. The calibration certificate is marked as failed for Class XX. The measurement data shows the gage would meet Class X limits. Both Class XX and Class X exceed our internal tolerance requirements.
We’re considering downgrading the gage from Class XX to Class X instead of scrapping it.
Since the certificate already contains the measurement data demonstrating that the gage meets Class X limits, can we rely on that existing certificate and update our log to reflect a Class X designation, even though the certificate shows a fail for Class XX?
Or, do we need to send the gage back for a new calibration performed specifically to Class X so that the certificate cleanly reflects the new class, with no failure listed?
I want to ensure our approach is ISO 9001 compliant and avoids traceability concerns during an audit.
Has anyone dealt with this before, and how did you handle the documentation?
Thanks in advance for your insight!