What's the purpose of the late root cause analysis?
E.Coli outbreak in Germany is something that could have bee foreseen.
The culprit should be held legally responsible for his/her action. So the question is, should Germany’s government punish the culprit or make some efforts to improve the system to prevent the similar occurrence in the future? Or both?
They haven't found the source yet, so at this point there's no one to blame. Two possible root causes are discussed lately:
- Employees could have contaminated the sprouts from the company near Uelzen (city in northern Germany). Three employees were hospitalized and positively tested for O104:H4, but other employees (who also eat sprouts regularly, but from different types of seeds) weren't ill or carriere of O104:H4.
- Employees could be infected by the sprouts they ate.
- One or more employees could have been infected by other sources and carried the bacteria into the company, to other employees and into the production of sprouts.
- The seeds could have been contaminated before being delivered to the company.
As some people were infected without eating sprouts from the company near Uelzen, but self-made sprouts, the seeds were tested. Until today no contaminated seeds could be found (could be a matter of the testing procedure, see below).
It is easy to test for E. coli and EHEC, but to verifiy the exact bacteria which caused the HUS-epidemic (O104:H4, mainly a hybrid of Enterohemorrhagic E. coli and Enteroaggregative E. coli), the existence of specific DNA-pieces have to be proofed. This could only be done by polymerase chain reaction (see
PCR) and will take about a week.
The RKI (Robert Koch institute) announced that the number of newly hospitalized patients is decreasing rapidly, so we all hope that whatever the source was, it was inactivated and can't cause new infections any more.
Regards,
Barbara