Edit rights in document control / document review

M

METerry

#1
First, my complements and gratitude to all - I have learned quite a bit from reading in the forums and I appreciate having the opportunity to learn from others experiences.
Secondly, I am a newby, both to the forums and to Quality Systems in general. I have a few clues (thanks to you) but little else.
I am working with document control software based on Lotus Notes Applications (databases). The software comes configured 'out-of-the-box' so that users (document initiators or drafters) can specify who is to review and approve the document. Multiple reviwers can be specified and the workflow default is draft->document controller->initial approver->reviewer(s)->final approver->document contoller->completed. So far, so good.
Here's my issue: Who should be able to /have rights to edit the documents? As the software is configured, the default is that anyone can edit the document anywhere along the workflow routing. In other words, a document can start out with a specific intent and objective but get derailed at any point along the way. Since there are provisions to reject or "send back" documents to the previous phase (requiring comments), it would seem to me that the document should be protected from editing except by the author. Any ideas?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

harry

Super Moderator
#2
The WHO, WHY, WHEN, WHERE and HOW with regards to document change/control should be found in your document control procedure. Have a look!

Regards.
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#3
First, my complements and gratitude to all - I have learned quite a bit from reading in the forums and I appreciate having the opportunity to learn from others experiences.
Secondly, I am a newby, both to the forums and to Quality Systems in general. I have a few clues (thanks to you) but little else.
I am working with document control software based on Lotus Notes Applications (databases). The software comes configured 'out-of-the-box' so that users (document initiators or drafters) can specify who is to review and approve the document. Multiple reviwers can be specified and the workflow default is draft->document controller->initial approver->reviewer(s)->final approver->document contoller->completed. So far, so good.
Here's my issue: Who should be able to /have rights to edit the documents? As the software is configured, the default is that anyone can edit the document anywhere along the workflow routing. In other words, a document can start out with a specific intent and objective but get derailed at any point along the way. Since there are provisions to reject or "send back" documents to the previous phase (requiring comments), it would seem to me that the document should be protected from editing except by the author. Any ideas?
In m experience, regardless if the document is paper, videotape, or electronic foo foo dust, the original author writes/rewrites the document and reviewers have rights to "redline" a document for return back to original author. The original author may "argue" over the suggestions and the string of reviewers/approvers ultimately settle on a consensus final document for approval.

The critical issue of allowing other than the original author to make a fixed version of the document always hinges on the audit trail to show who exactly is responsible for a change and whether that change is unilateral or goes through a chain of review/approval by others before release.
 
Last edited:

RoxaneB

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#4
Congrats on making your first post, METerry. :applause:

My organization uses IBS (formally called QSI) software for our document control and is run off of a Lotus Notes platform. Are you using the same software?

If so, edit rights for our documents have been set up as follows:
  • Document Author - primary person responsible for document
  • Document Manager - used as a secondary (i.e., back-up) author, but has same access rights as Document author
  • Document Approver(s) - typically a department manager
    • FYI - In the software, the Document Author may not be an Approver...the software will prompt you to select either a different Approver or Author. However, a Document Manager, may be an Approver.
  • Administrator - I am the super user for the software and play with and approve and kill off any document I feel like...I mean, which should be modified or addressed in case of an emergency...phew...close call.

These people play with documents within the Document Control database. Anyone who is not an Author/Manager/Approver/Administrator does not have the Document Control database on their desktop. Should they find it, no worries, but they will be unable to modify any documents so the precautions are in place so that non-designated personnel can not monkey around in the system.

All people with a computer have access to the Released Documents database. If, while reading/reviewing a document, a person believes that a change is necessary, the software allows the individual to create a Document Change Request (DCR). When submitted, the DCR goes to the Author and Manager and waits for their approval/rejection. Notice of the approval/rejection is automatically sent back to the requester when the Author/Manager has made his/her decision.

While in the submission phase of document control, if an Approver does not like the content of the document, it is part of our process for them to state the reason for rejection as well as to highlight any proposed changes within the document itself.

We do not have any problems with documents being derailed, mainly because our Authors/Managers are the process owners and know the details of what they are writing. Out of curiousity, who is writing your documents, METerry? The only time that I can really recall a "derailment" with a document is when an Approver includes either our Environment or Health & Safety Manager. They may reject a document because the process owner has missed or has incorrect legal information within the document and Env/H&S will attempt to correct the document and process before providing final approval.
 
Last edited:
#5
In m experience, regardless if the document is paper, videotape, or electronic foo foo dust, the original author writes/rewrites the document and reviewers have rights to "redline" a document for return back to original author. The original author may "argue" over the suggestions and the string of reviewers/approvers ultimately settle on a consensus final document for approval.

The critical issue of allowing other than the original author to make a fixed version of the document always hinges on the audit trail to show who exactly is responsible for a change and whether that change is unilateral or goes through a chain of review/approval by ohers before release.
Agreed!:yes:

Andy
 
D

donaghadee - 2008

#6
In our company only the Quality and Compliance Department, ie 4 out of over 1,000 employees can store controlled documents. As I say "it is your document, send the document to me and I will see if it complies with our own and industry, regulatory and ISO standards." Once we have agreed or is amended to ensure compliance then I will ensure that it is version-controlled and stored as the master copy. It works!
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#7
We do as Wes outlines. Anybody can ask for a revision or edit, but in the end the "approver" is the one that decides which, if any, of the suggested revisions are used.
 

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
It sounds like the culture is to make the changes online - which is fine - reduces paper, etc. If that's the case, then changing a culture to adopt a (new) process is always a challenge. Most document tools allow you to redline or somehow otherwise indicate a change (or, at worst, offer a difference between documents). You can use such features (e.g., change tracking in Word) to ensure the author has final say in changes. As an author, I would not want to sign something that has been taken out of my hands and potentially modified.
 
V

Valeri

#9
Like Roxane, we use the QSI software. If that is what you have, there is a database, Information Catalog, in which to set-up various approvers, editors, managers, etc. for the databases. There is where you define the controls.

UNLIKE Roxane, I do kill off documents:notme:
 
M

METerry

#10
Many thanks Harry. You are correct and we are reviewing what we say we do to see how close it is to what we actually do. Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your perspective, the software allows us a lot of flexibility in regards to work flow and there a at least a couple of descrepancies between the Doc Control Procedure and the software handling of change requests, etc.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Brizilla User Profile - How do I edit my profile info? Elsmar Xenforo Forum Software Instructions and Help 3
Jen Kirley I have been invited to help edit an ASQ exam again Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 8
M MS Outlook - How to edit the front page of the 'Task' form Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
JoCam Acquired Medical Devices - Company A buys the entire rights EU Medical Device Regulations 4
Y Local Agent and Sales Rights in countries like Brazil and Russia Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
I Definition Insubordination in Organizations - Definition, extent; vis-a-vis employee's rights. Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 14
K Organization's Rights vs. Customer's Rights - Product Return vs. Replacement Customer Complaints 13
K Rights of Auditors - Are they allowed to copy and take our documents? General Auditing Discussions 5
Sidney Vianna ANAB Accreditation Council Drafts Client Bill of Rights ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 2
A COPY RIGHTS ISSUE? Guidance Required General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Marc Laptops at U.S. border: No privacy rights Travel - Hotels, Motels, Planes and Trains 6
A Rights of Access per ASME/NQA-1 2000 Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 17
Marc Civil rights legend Rosa Parks dies at 92 World News 3
J Document Control Metrics Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
A Document Review and Document Approval --- 2 Signatures needed acc. §820.40? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
I Document Control Software Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
K 25-year lifetime of medical device - document storage period EU Medical Device Regulations 1
J UDI - Where to document it? EU Medical Device Regulations 8
T Controlling Expandable Forms in Paper-Based Document Control System Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S Changing revision status of a reviewed document Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
shimonv Document Control Procedure Header Content Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
Q Document ownerships Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14
E Document Change Request forms (or no forms)? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
O Any info on release date of FDA “Computer Software Assurance for Manufacturing and Quality System Software” document? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
B Document Approval Matrix Benchmarking Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
J Document Approval Signature Order Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
L How to add exemption or statement to control of document procedure? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M What is the proper way to document measurements Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
P Equipment 21 CFR 820.70(g) - User Requirements Document for Off the shelf equipment 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 7
B Do IFU designs have to be document controlled under ISO 13485? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
C Certificate of Conformance Form - COC for each customer a controlled document? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
R Document Retention - Discard hard-copies after scanning? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
P Mylar plot suppliers in accordance with D6-51991 document AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
A Document Change Notice vs complete System re-write Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
Q Document approval through SharePoint (without signature) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
S What is considered a "core algorithm"? (From an FDA guidance document) Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
U Document Approval - Software company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
O Please, help with document on ISO/ TS 17758 and (IDF 87: 1979). Thank you. Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
I Nitpicking on document released dates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
I Document Control on Log Files ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q Refusal to Document Complaints Customer Complaints 39
Q Tracking Procedure Revisions (Document Control) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
C Document Control Stamps - Does anyone still stamp their documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24
I Master Document Access - ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.5.3 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
I Can a document (form) approval record be separate? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
I Control of Documentation Distribution - Document Control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
T Advice needed - Environmental MS - unwritten but customer requests policy document ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom