E
encee98
Greetings everyone. We are in the process of documenting our QMS. Should the effectivity dates of our policies (manual) and procedures manual be the same for our revision 0 documents? Our consultants say it should be.
Naomi
Naomi
Better yet, ask the consultant to drop into the Cove for a refresher on the basics and to update vocabulary to replace the controversial word "effectivity" with two words: "effective date."It doesn't really matter as long as you can show adequate control and correct status. Tell your "consultant" to fuss about more important issues.
Greetings everyone. We are in the process of documenting our QMS. Should the effectivity dates of our policies (manual) and procedures manual be the same for our revision 0 documents? Our consultants say it should be.
Naomi
Actually, I can think of several reasons why a revision of an existing text document or engineering drawing might have a future date for when it becomes effective. Here's just a few:Why even bother having an 'effective' date on the documents? Aren't the documents effective from when they're approved/released for implementation?
If not, then I'd suggest you get some help from your consultant to see why your document control procedure is taking so long! From the date of approvals to the date of implementaion shouldn't be more than a day or so, at most!
Thank you all. I'm afraid I followed the path of least resistance and just had both manuals reflect the same effective date. Lots of paper wasted, but in the course, changed the term "effectivity" to "effective."
Be well all.