just so you know where I am comming from, this is what we do:
we send a contractor manual out to all contractors coming on to our site. it outlines all health and safety and environmental requirements and is accompanied by a letter that gives them a list of some of our more significant aspects. The contractor company is required to send back the sign-off sheet at the back of the manual, along with proof of insurance and WSIB coverage. For some contractors we request certain documents, for example:
air conditioning repair company - we request their technician's refrigerant licenses
waste haulers/disposal sites - we request their certificates of approval from the ministry of environment
Quote: (Originally Posted by jmp4429) “MaryAnn and Donald have been fully trained to perform their duties in housekeeping, are aware of the potential environmental impact of the chemicals they use in their duties, and have been trained to properly respond to any chemical spills or other environmental incidents that might occur while they are on duty at ABC
Company.” What do you think – should this cover us?
now dealing with non-skilled contractors as you specifically mentioned, we have not really tackled that beyond the contractor manual sign-off. You could have them write a letter such as you mentioned, but would you require proof of training (i.e. training records) as well? I don't think having only the letter on file would prove competence. to truely make sure all contractor's are competent I would say you might need to require them to have ISO 14001 themselves. that might not (ok.. IS not) possible for all contractors but maybe something to look into for larger contractors who can impact more significant aspects.
I suspect that what the auditor is after is something along the lines of this: Our HVAC contractor isn’t going to release a bunch of refrigerant into the air, our contract electricians aren’t going to create tons of smoke by causing an electrical fire, our exterminator isn’t going to spill 100 gallons of highly toxic pesticide down our storm drains, our cafeteria people aren’t going to dispose of old oil from the deep fryers by tossing it out the back door…
But are these SIGNIFICANT aspects for your organization? If not then you should look at which aspects your organization considers significant and which contractors can affect them. Those are the contractors that you should ensure competence. For the ones you mention above, i think having their refrigerant licenses, electrician licenses, license/permits to apply pesticides, etc. on file would be sufficient - i.e. they are competent through education/training. i wouldn't think an oil spill from your cafeteria is significant. if that is the least of your worries, I would love to work for your company!
You should focus on ensuring ALL contractors are aware of your EMS and significant aspects (which it sounds like you do similar to what we do) but only need to ensure competence of contractors working on things that you consider significant. also maybe keep a log of any environmental issues with contractors....those working on site for a long period with no issues would be competent in my eyes.
i don't know...this is a difficult one. sorry i can't be of any more help.