Repeating from the Conformity Matrix that I found for the past discussion:
"The organization shall establish processes to ensure that:a) importance of meeting customer, legal, and other applicable requirements is communicated at relevant functions within the organization; andb) results of analysis of data (see 6.3) are communicated at relevant levels and functions within the organization."
"The organization shall maintain a documented procedure for the identification, collection, and analysis of data to demonstrate the suitability and effectiveness of the quality management system. The analysis shall include data generated from monitoring and measurement, internal audits (see 6.2.2), management reviews (see 6.5), and other relevant sources. The data analysis output shall provide information relating to: a) customer satisfaction (see 6.2.1); b) conformity to product requirements; c) nonconformities and product failures identified after delivery or use, provided the product or documented evidence is available to facilitate the determination of the cause (see 5.10);d) characteristics and trends of processes and products including opportunities for preventive action (see 6.4.3); e) supplier performance (see 5.6); and f) quality objectives (see 4.1.3).The organization shall use data to evaluate where continual improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system can be made."
Most of this is knowing what to measure that is specific to your product (you mentioned ball valves - I am fairly familiar with those from nuclear submarines). The verbiage above is relatively generic to ISO 9000, and NQA-1 and the "QA Rule" (10 CFR 830.122) which I had to work to in the nuclear industry.