Establishing Internal Audit Nonconformity Level Criteria - Major vs. Minor?

A

Aaron Lupo

#11
António Vieira said:
Ranking the nonconformities in internal audits can be a very wise decision.
I do it all the time.
It’s also a good idea when you have quality objectives related to the number of nonconformities in internal audits.
This way you can state a number of observations, a number of minor nonconformities and a number of major nonconformities as maximum values for this kind of objective to be achieved.
Anyway it’s also a good idea to rank these nonconformities just to be in accordance with what 3rd and 2nd party audits are doing...

I know at my last place of employment we did not have Major/Minor ranking for N/C's. There really is no reason to give them a ranking, the ones that need an immediate response were assigned a shorter time period for response and the issues that were not as alarming had a longer response period. As far as the customer ranking them as major or minor they never did, and we would have on average one customer audit a week.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
T

tarheels4 - 2007

#12
Aaron Lupo said:
There really is no reason to give them a ranking, the ones that need an immediate response were assigned a shorter time period for response and the issues that were not as alarming had a longer response period.
That would seem to me to be a ranking/weighting.
 

Crusader

Trusted Information Resource
#13
My registrar does not recommend classifying audit findings regardless of the severity. Nonconformances are simply "Findings" nothing more or less.
 
#14
Hoorah for common sense........

I am so pleased to read the majority of responses are not in favor of such grading. It is an external (2nd or 3rd party) auditor's method and, as such, shouldn't be used internally. However, I got chewed out by a customer when I said that, during an Internal Auditor course I presented last week................:( :eek:

Andy
 
Q

QualityPhD

#15
OK, I feel the need to play Devil's Advocate here. Many have said NCRs "shouldn't be classified as Major or Minor", and should be classified as "Findings"...

Like a good auditor and trainer, I am asking you to "show me the shall" or "show me the should". This is a quick test of auditor ability to verify the guidance documents that apply to auditors and auditing...

;) Keep in mind that I already have a verifiable answer.... like any good auditor who knows the answer before he/she asks the question....
 
S

stanislavd

#16
Measure and Analyze, here comes nonconformities clasificiation

Hi Folks,

IMHO the idea of not rating isn't very good. I always try to prioritize my work and this help me allot. So in one quality system I expect the audited persons and the auditors to have ranked the nonconformities and to know on which of them they shall focus more resources. Did you try ever to prioritize together with the audited or process responsible persons?
BTW, In some cases I have explained the "Minor Nonconformity" as description related problem - the process flow is not followed but the quality is not affected, so maybe the process description should be revised (the rule for lowest resistance path :))

Ann,

I think there is ISO guidelines about "shall vs. should" topic. Do you try to link the "shall/should" with "major/minor"? If yes, pls provide us with some examples.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A

Aaron Lupo

#17
QualityPhD said:
OK, I feel the need to play Devil's Advocate here. Many have said NCRs "shouldn't be classified as Major or Minor", and should be classified as "Findings"...

Like a good auditor and trainer, I am asking you to "show me the shall" or "show me the should". This is a quick test of auditor ability to verify the guidance documents that apply to auditors and auditing...
Show you the shall or should for what, classfying internal N/C's????
 
Last edited by a moderator:
M

Myriam

#18
According to me there is no shall/ should for classifying NC's on internal auditing. But I think there is also no rule which says you should not.
So, in my opinion a company is free to classify NC's or can choose not to do so.
To be sure I also checked ISO 19011 which states, "NC's and their reporting audit evidence should be recorded. NC's may be graded."
 
M

Martijn

#19
We are grading our internal audit NC's. I think it works because first of all the auditors are forced to look further then "it's not like it says in the procedure so it's a minor" and think more about what the finding means. Is it structural, is it clearly influencing customer satisfaction, what other processes are influenced by this, etc.. I think a major also proves that somebody has been sleeping/is not doing their job properly (assuming the QMS is ok and given the fact that working in compliance with the QMS is a personal objective), which should have results in terms of personal goals / appraisals, on all levels if it's not picked up immediately.

Say there's a site that structurally does not do any recording of customer complaints. They all know they have to, dont do it, PDCA-loop is simply not closed, write a major, make some noise, make sure top management fixes it straight away or else....

And no we haven't had any yet. :)

PS might be another topic in in itself, quality as integral part of objectives/appraisals
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#20
QualityPhD said:
OK, I feel the need to play Devil's Advocate here. Many have said NCRs "shouldn't be classified as Major or Minor", and should be classified as "Findings"...

Like a good auditor and trainer, I am asking you to "show me the shall" or "show me the should". This is a quick test of auditor ability to verify the guidance documents that apply to auditors and auditing...

;) Keep in mind that I already have a verifiable answer.... like any good auditor who knows the answer before he/she asks the question....
Well, no one has taken the bait. I'm interested to hear your answer.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Help establishing regulatory requirements - Plastic dental cartridge syringe US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
K ISO 13485 section 5.3 Quality Policy - No framework for establishing and reviewing quality objectives ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
N Use part of high risk device for establishing low risk device EU Medical Device Regulations 0
J ISO 13485:2016 Section 6.2 - Documenting the process for establishing competence ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
M Establishing a FTQ (First Time Quality) process for an engine assembly line Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
R Establishing the quality policy for ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
N Establishing a monthly scrap cost target Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 11
T Establishing -F- datum - need advice Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
S Establishing a Gage R&R Studies Program in a Testing Laboratory Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
M Establishing traceability from calibrated glassware to non calibrated ones General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
O Establishing SPC for small batches of 10-15 units Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
M Establishing Metrics - Where do you document metrics? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
alonFAI Establishing a Receiving Inspection Procedure Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
optomist1 Establishing Sigma or Capabilty Indices for Automotive Safety Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
S Establishing an MSA Plan and Justification Suggestions wanted Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
M Establishing a QMS - What Daily/Weekly/Monthly activities in Auto Industry IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
T Help establishing a good Customer Complaints Procedure? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
V Process Validation Guidance establishing the Integration with QbD - April 2012 Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
M Establishing Ranges for Weights for Calibration Verification of a Micro-Balance Calibration Frequency (Interval) 1
D Preparing for ISO 29001/API Q1- Establishing Control Features Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 3
D Establishing Key Process Characteristics (KPC's) Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 6
C New Quality Manager - Establishing Teams in different Business Units Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
H Noob Frequency Distribution and establishing achievable goals Using Minitab Software 2
K How to apply IEC 62366 and what shall be changed in establishing a Technical File ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M Establishing monthly production targets with varying number of employees Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 6
A Why do I need batch size in establishing control plan to certain AQL?? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
E Need help establishing a DMR (Device Master Record) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
K Basis for Establishing Gage Tolerancing - "Gage Maker's Tolerances" General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
K Establishing the Environmental Aspects and Impacts for a Septic Tank Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 5
M Establishing simple procedure and work instruction using chart or photo or video Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
L Criteria for Establishing Control Plan Sample Size and Inspection Frequency FMEA and Control Plans 7
K Inventory Management - Establishing a procedure for Inventory Management Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
K Establishing Item Codes for Production Raw Materials Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
O Establishing the current value of KPI's (Key Performance Indicators) Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
Y Establishing and Measuring Individual Performance to Product Quality Standards Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
C Establishing alert and action limits for clean room bioburden Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 9
E Establishing a biocompability test lab for testing EN 10993 series EU Medical Device Regulations 1
D Establishing and controlling process capability - Meaning of Phrases Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
P Establishing Thickness Specifications from Measured Data Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 11
A Initial condition for establishing significant environmental aspects Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 1
S Establishing Control of Regulations that concern my company Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 12
D Establishing New Training Procedure - Past Training of Existing Employees Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
J Establishing Proposal Metrics in a Factory Construction Company Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 6
A How to do Equipment Validation - Establishing our ISO 13485 QMS procedures Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 28
B True Position without tertiary datum? Establishing a proper rotation Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 12
Coury Ferguson Interpretation of IAF Guide 62 - Establishing the Competence of the Auditors Registrars and Notified Bodies 11
H Establishing Employee Competencies and Training - Future Training Plan ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
P China - Establishing Quality Systems for Chinese Suppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
Q Feedback System (8.2.1) - Requirements for "..establishing a documented procedure..." ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Douglas E. Purdy Transition to ISO 9001:2000 - RFI - 009, RFI-003, & Establishing a QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9

Similar threads

Top Bottom