EU Commission requires NB (Notified Body) Unannounced Visits

parr05

Starting to get Involved
#1
I was told by our NB that It is now a proposal from the EU Commission that the Notified Body will have to perform unannounced visits to the premises. They also have to do unannounced visit in case of vigilance cases giving them reason for concern. He said that they will be checked by their Competent Authority that we are actually performing unannounced visit.
I wonder if any of you guys know more about it.
Thanks.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

pkost

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Re: NB Unannounce visits.

The European Association Medical devices - Notified Bodies (TEAM-NB) updated their code of conduct last year, such that it now requires it's members to conduct unannounced audits

http://www.team-nb.org/documents/2012/Team-NB-Press-release-COC.pdf
http://www.team-nb.org/documents/2012/Code_of_Conduct_Medical_Notified-Bodies_v3-0.pdf

This is a clarification of what is already permitted by the MDD and becoming an expectation of the authorities following the breast implant scandal.

The proposed medical device regulation clarifies it further and makes the requirement explicit.
 

parr05

Starting to get Involved
#3
Re: NB Unannounce visits.

Great information. Thank you very much.
I see that this will affect the cost for the annual surveillance and re-certification.
Also, the part that got my attention reading the Methodology for determining audit duration, was that table in IAF MD 9:2011. annex D. Table D1. "days of audit duration for 10 to 15 effective number of personnel is 4.5 days. any comments?
Once again, Thank you.
 
#4
I noted on the NB-Med site some minutes from one of their committee meetings when unannounced visits were discussed.

At that time several of the NBs represented had done a "UV" (unannounced visit). They reported that their reception had not been very friendly and suggested to others to "take their own lunch with them". And they did speculate that getting invoices paid may prove problematic!

The "standard" UV is reported as being 1 day long with 2 auditors.
 

pkost

Trusted Information Resource
#5
I noted on the NB-Med site some minutes from one of their committee meetings when unannounced visits were discussed.

At that time several of the NBs represented had done a "UV" (unannounced visit). They reported that their reception had not been very friendly and suggested to others to "take their own lunch with them". And they did speculate that getting invoices paid may prove problematic!

The "standard" UV is reported as being 1 day long with 2 auditors.
Not sure what else they would expect...Planned visits mean the the necessary people are on site and have time scheduled for the audit. UV's are likely to encounter key staff out of the office and other staff having to drop their current prioirties for a visit. We don't wait around just for them to audit!

Taking their own lunch...again this is planned in advance, although I'm surprised the typical delay of "lets go out for lunch" isn't used by the company!
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#6
:caution::caution:I expect some folks would see this "rule" as creating a police force without badges who are essentially being granted "no knock" search warrants to seek out innocent as well as intended misbehavior. Worse, the object of the search warrant must pay whether there is misbehavior or not.

Maybe I've become a Libertarian in my dotage, but this smacks of "Kwality Kop" to me. The auditors who do NOT find reportable error will find themselves suspected of being on the take. Worse, there may be some auditors who will engage in extortion to give a clean bill of health to the auditee.

At the same time, I KNOW there are bad apples who violate the letter and spirit of 3rd party registration and they should be discovered and punished. My discomfort is that this police work is done by "private contractors" - in effect, mercenaries. Many bad things are attributed to mercenaries in various parts of the world. Let us hope the present scandals don't expand to include auditors.
 
R

Ron Boumans

#7
There is a time and a place for unannounced visits. But this should be considered well. As an inspector for a competent authority I have some experience with them. There can be a big difference in what you find coming with or without prior notification. In the past we have only used this tool after careful consideration and then it was often very useful. I am not sure how this will develop in the near future when we are supposed to do this on a more routine basis.

In my view there are still lessons to be learned from the PIP case. Would unannounced visits really have made a difference?
 
#8
My understanding was that, in the PIP case, they were moving the non-approved chemicals they used to make their own silicone to storage facilities that were completely unknown to the auditor. That is, they were hiding the stuff off-site.

An unannounced visit would have not allowed them any time to hide their secrets and could have stopped the fraud at an earlier stage.
 
R

Ron Boumans

#9
My understanding was that, in the PIP case, they were moving the non-approved chemicals they used to make their own silicone to storage facilities that were completely unknown to the auditor. That is, they were hiding the stuff off-site.

An unannounced visit would have not allowed them any time to hide their secrets and could have stopped the fraud at an earlier stage.
The question is if unannounced visits would have found these problems. What should a notified body or competent authority be looking for, and how should they gather data? Is it technically possible to identify counterfeight in a factory? And how about manufacturers that don't have their own production? I don't know, and as far as I know, nobody knows because I haven't seen a proper evaluation of the inspection process. That is all I want to say about this.
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#10
IMHO regulations and standards are created to those that want to apply and be in conformity with them.

The PIP case was a police case, not a regulatory case.

If we create a regulation or standard with the premise that the user is lying or counterfeiting or whatever like this, we will really have to change the approach and act more like the police.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
dgrainger Informational Postponement of MDR - adopted by the Commission - April 2020 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
T Commission proposal being drawn up for postponement for date of application of MDR (2017/745) EU Medical Device Regulations 7
E Commission Regulation (EU) No. 207/2012 E-IFU Applicability EU Medical Device Regulations 5
M Informational EU – Commission Implementing Decision (EU) as regards the designation of expert panels in the field of medical devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational European Commission expert panels on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/939 of 6 June 2019 designating issuing entities designated to operate a system for the assignment of Unique Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/319 of 6 February 2019 amending previous regulations as regards health certification at import into the Union concerni Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational Medtech Europe – Open letter to the European Commission on the implementation and readiness status of the new Medical Device Regulation (MDR) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational From the Implant Files – French commission calls for massive medtech regulation overhaul Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Medical Device News EC – Commission reply to a Petition “For a Compensation Fund for PIP Breast Implants and CE” from the website change.org Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Medical Device News MedTech Europe - European Parliament further clarifies Commission proposal on HTA for medical technologies EU Medical Device Regulations 0
R Brexit - European Commission - The impact of the Brexit per March 29, 2019 EU Medical Device Regulations 3
E ISO 15223-1 (Medical Device Label Symbols) - Revisions, EU commission? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
CharlieUK New EU Commission "Blue Guide" to CE Marking - 2014 CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
somashekar Definition Supply and Erection / Supply and Commission - Technical Quotation Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
M ISO TS 24971 Updates and formal objection of the European Commission to ISO 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 24
Ronen E European Commission calls for action following PIP's Breast Implant Saga EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M European Commission Questions Risk Management Standard ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 7
Ajit Basrur U.S. ? China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) - Fact Sheet ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
P How does Commission Directive 2008/58/EC affect small suppliers Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 4
T EC Legislation - Power Difference on Directive, Commission Decision, Council Decision Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 2
A En 550/554 - The European Commission Standards Harmonization ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A ISO/DIS 15223-1:2020 - Country of manufacture label (IEC 60417 No. 6049) - Which national law requires this symbol? Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
Tagin Hosting in the cloud still requires DR (OVH fire) Business Continuity & Resiliency Planning (BCRP) 1
T GDT Callout - How to call out a note that requires some clamp load Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
K My question is, what/when is a nonconformity? Therefore what requires an NCR? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
M MDR requires the NB to perform "tests in order to check that the quality management system" EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S Education authority requires approval of all courses - Training services provider ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
L What to do if a Corrective Action requires several extensions Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
I What level of change in documentation requires re-training? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
B How to do a control chart - Machining product that requires flatness control Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1
A Our auditor requires us to attend a training on EN ISO 14971:2012 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 3
U SI 13 - Not Every Process Requires an Efficiency Measure IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
R Concessions - ISO 13485:2016 requires concession approval from customers Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
Jane's When audit NC requires only correction ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
S One of our devices requires servicing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
shimonv Re-Sterilizing a Device which requires Re-Opening and Repair EU Medical Device Regulations 3
marmotte Malaysia - Auditor Requires an Updated Audit Report Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 5
T Customer requires Internal Specification to be met on PPAP APQP and PPAP 7
A What is the definition of Installation that requires Record Keeping vs Set-up 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
S SPC Card for One Sample Size - Customer requires for all critical dimensions Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
V Customer requires CpK 2 and PpK 1.5 Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
M Customer Requires a new PFMEA Format FMEA and Control Plans 1
L The ISO 9001 standard requires: Pop Quiz!! ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
Q ISO standards that requires a Barcode to be placed on a product ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Does the power supply need to be medical grade like the EU requires? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
H Measurement System in Control if the Equipment requires Daily Calibration? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
M Mechanical Auto Repair Shop requires ISO 9001 Certification ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
A IMDS DIFFICULTY: Our customer requires the Wildcard portion MUST be < 0.1 % RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 5
M Do ISO requires Business Plan? Any sample template? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom