SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

EU MDR - Liability Clause per article 31

sriramsl

Involved In Discussions
#1
Dear Experts - Ronen, Marcelo et al

In the EU MDR there is a liability clause as per article 31 :

"In view of the fact that natural or legal persons can claim compensation for damage caused by a defective device in accordance with applicable Union and national law, it is appropriate to require manufacturers to have measures in place to provide sufficient financial coverage in respect of their potential liability under Council Directive 85/374/EEC ). Such measures should be proportionate to the risk class, type of device and the size of the enterprise. In this context, it is also appropriate to lay down rules concerning the facilitation, by a competent authority, of the provision of information to persons who may have been injured by a defective device "

Does this mean that the manufacturers have to take an Product Liability Insurance? and will this be insisted by the Competent Authority before approval of the product?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#3
The text from the OP is from the preamble ("Whereas"...")

The formal requirement is in Article 10 - General obligations of manufacturers

16. Natural or legal persons may claim compensation for damage caused by a defective device in accordance with applicable Union and national law.

Manufacturers shall, in a manner that is proportionate to the risk class, type of device and the size of the enterprise, have measures in place to provide sufficient financial coverage in respect of their potential liability under Directive 85/374/EEC, without prejudice to more protective measures under national law.
Right now, it's really not clear what to expect from this requirement. In on hand, it does seem to require that the manufacturer complies with Directive 85/374/EEC (which they should already be doing). On the other hand, "measures in place to provide sufficient financial coverage" does seem to imply that insurance may be required.

I expect that we will have a guidance on this in the future.
 
Last edited:

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
Here's a link to the MDR online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ENG/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745&from=EN

There are actually a couple of places where this is mentioned. Item 31 in the main body (?) is on p. 15:

"In view of the fact that natural or legal persons can claim compensation for damage caused by a defective device in accordance with applicable Union and national law, it is appropriate to require manufacturers to have measures in place to provide sufficient financial coverage in respect of their potential liability under Council Directive 85/374/EEC1. Such measures should be proportionate to the risk class, type of device and the size of the enterprise. In this context, it is also appropriate to lay down rules concerning the facilitation, by a competent authority, of the provision of information to persons who may have been injured by a defective device."

And then again in article 10, item 16, p. 84:

"Manufacturers shall, in a manner that is proportionate to the risk class, type of device and the size of the enterprise, have measures in place to provide sufficient financial coverage in respect of their potential liability under Directive 85/374/EEC, without prejudice to more protective measures under national law."
 

mikinnear

Starting to get Involved
#5
Ah yes,

Sorry with the mention of article 31 in the original post, that is exactly where I jumped to, on a further search I do see this text on page 15.

Kind regards,
Mike.
 

isolytical

Involved In Discussions
#6
Although not stated, it is clear that the word 'commensurate' strongly implies that one mitigation does not apply to all products. This is supported by the wording seen in the Directive(s). Thus to assume the PLI is required in absence of more complete product related information is erroneous.
 

sriramsl

Involved In Discussions
#7
Thank you Marcelo for your reply

As you said, hope we will get clarification on this from Regulatory Authority.
Regards
Sriram
 

RobertvanBoxtel

Involved In Discussions
#8
The requirement to have product liability Insurance is not new, also not for the medical devices in the EU.
The reference product liability Directive is applicable in these cases. And there might be more local member state requirements.

Also, look into Article 10.14 regarding information you will have to disclose to member states that can even end up at patients or Insurance companies.
The big unknown is what is sufficient coverage as there are no specifics on that, just depending on risk etc.
 

MiamiDM

Starting to get Involved
#9
Picking up on the requirement for liability insurance, an 'external consultant', not a NB, has recommended a review of liability insurance is covered in the Quality Manual or as part of Management Review.

Although representing 'best practice', I don't think reference to liability insurance in a QMS procedure is an expectation/requirement of the MDR.

Is my response reasonable?

Thoughts appreciated, thank you.
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
Liability Insurance is an essential part of risk management for MD companies. So I’d expect companies to have a process in place for keeping this documented information up to date. If the auditee could not show me then I’d take this concern up with top management.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Ed Panek MDR Liability Insurance EU Medical Device Regulations 1
P MDR PRRC (person responsible for regulatory compliance) and personal liability EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Y Liability Insurance Requirements under the MDR - p. 15 (item 31) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
L EU MDR Ramifications for no expiration date on labeling EU Medical Device Regulations 1
R How to obtain OBL licence under Indian MDR, 2017 Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
F MDR – Article 120 – Transitional provisions EU Medical Device Regulations 2
H MDR Article 13(c) EU Medical Device Regulations 6
Ed Panek Auditor MDR (Presub audit) finding EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Classification of Instruments under EU MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Procedure for vigilance system according to new MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M Procedure for clinical evaluation according to new MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
R MEDDEV 2.12-1 rev 8 (Vigilance guidelines) still applicable with the MDR implementation? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Determining a device category according to the MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A Transactions under MDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
H Has anyone undergone MDR FQA review yet? EU Medical Device Regulations 10
S UK MDR + EU MDR Declaration of Conformity UK Medical Device Regulations 0
D Does Risk Management apply to re-labeler (MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
H MDD VS MDR 2002-218 UK Medical Device Regulations 6
S MDD to MDR - Tallow Derivatives Impact EU Medical Device Regulations 1
P Update on NBOG 2014-3 to address MDR/IVDR, or any plan to do that? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
A MDR requirement where unit of use packaging is too small for UDI carrier EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S MDR GSPR Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A MDR - Legacy Device Review Timeframe and Requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 3
J Translation requirements for the statement referred to in ANNEX XIII of MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
J EU MDR GSPR 10.4.3 and 10.4.4 EU Medical Device Regulations 2
F Labelling to comply with both FDA and MDR US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
N EU MDR and its impact on existing Registrations EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Post Market Safety Update Report for devices that will be up-classified under MDR but are currently under MDD EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Y MDR Transition - make "Available on the market" after CE certificate expiration EU Medical Device Regulations 3
C MDR Classification Rule 10 EU Medical Device Regulations 13
C MDR software classification EU Medical Device Regulations 12
Y MDR requirements for Class I accessories EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M MDR legal actions - manufacturers CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 8
R Products not within the MDR grace period EU Medical Device Regulations 1
shimonv MDR transition checklist EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Re-packaging under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Ed Panek Upcoming NB MDD ---> MDR Crunch EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S MDR - System and procedure pack article 22 and all sub processes that apply ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
C Requirements for distributors under MDR: translation EU Medical Device Regulations 0
A Should we assign the PRRC before the date of application of MDR (26 May 2021)? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
N Looking for a recommendation for an EU MDR Importer EU Medical Device Regulations 1
JoCam Rental and MDD versus MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A Can anyone share a Distribution Agreement template under MDR 2017/745? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
A MDR ANNEX XI part A or Part B EU Medical Device Regulations 0
N OBL under the MDR. Which are the obligations of the OEM? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
U Distributor obligations under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Raisin picker CECP, consultation according to Art 54 MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K Question on MDR classification EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M STED vs MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
F UDI-PI required on packaging (MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom