EU MDR Rule 11 - Does the 'Risk logic' used in Rule 11 conflict with that used in the other rules?

kreid

Involved In Discussions
#1
Hello,

Does the 'Risk logic' used in Rule 11 conflict with that used in the other rules?

It appears to me that the logic used in Rule 11 is different to that used in the older 'MDD' rules, here is an example of what I mean:

If I have a device that is active and intended to emit ionizing radiation for therapeutic purposes, it could be classified as Class IIb under Rule 9;
If, associated with that device, there is a second device which controlled, monitored or directly influenced that first device, it could be classified as Class IIb also under Rule 9;
If we accept that the ion emitting device could cause death or irreversible deterioration of health (as some of these device can and do) and that second device was a software device would it still be classified as Class IIb under rule 9 or Class III under Rule 11 (using implementing rule 3.5)?

It seems to me that saying a device that emits radiation for therapeutic purposes is Class IIb when some of these devices could cause death or irreversible deterioration of health, is using a different risk logic to that used in Rule 11.

As a second part of this question, from a general risk engineering perspective, is it possible that the risk classification of something that controls or directly influences a 'primary' device could be of a higher rsik clssification than that 'primary' device, assuming the controller introduces no more risk scenarios?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

dgrainger

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Yes, there is a 'new logic' introduced with rule 11 and there will be quite a lot of up-classifications for active devices with software involvement.
 

Watchcat

Trusted Information Resource
#3
Perhaps what they are saying is that classification is not determined by the harm that a device could cause, but by the likelihood that the controls intended to reduce the risk of the harm might fail? I'm applying FDA's mindset here (I think), in which device classification is determined, not by risk, but by the adequacy of controls (general, special). In that case, what the regulation would be saying is that the regulators have less confidence in the controls applied to a software device than to a hardware device.

Does that work?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
P MDR Rule 10 interpretation - Active Device EU Medical Device Regulations 3
N Medical Device Classification under MDR - Rule 21 EU Medical Device Regulations 11
M Informational EU MDR Classification Rule 11 – what??? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 9
A Please explain MDR Rule 11 to me EU Medical Device Regulations 67
J MDR Annex VIII, Rule 6 Classification - Implication for lower risk CV products? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
R MDR Software Rule 11 Formal Interpretation EU Medical Device Regulations 7
G EU MDR 2017/745 Rule 11 interpretation - Re-classification of a Software as Medical Device Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
C Substance based Medical Device Classification under MDR - Rule 21 EU Medical Device Regulations 9
I Interpretation of the MDR GSPR 23.4 (u) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
S Converting SOP MDD to MDR Noob ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
K Biological indicator system classification under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 2
L 'Distributor' definition & MDR/MSR relationship EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A What does this line from MDCG 2020-3 (MDR art. 120 substantial change) mean to you? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
J EU MDR getting closer - Special offer for Elsmar members 10/2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 9
D ISO 14971:2019 vs MDR Annex 1, Requirement #4 - "Manufacturers shall inform users of any residual risks" ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
G MDR translation requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 3
K Applicability of Cybersecurity EU MDR 2017/745 Annex 1 23.4(ab), 14.2(d) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
K Applicability of eIFU as per EU MDR 2017/745 Annex 1 23.1 CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
rob73 UK Medical Device Regulations Forum - UK MDR Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 1
J Intervertebral body fusion cage, MDR Class II or Class III? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
F MDR GSPR Checklist template EU Medical Device Regulations 4
B Clinical Evaluation Expert Panels - MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M EU MDR - Labilities when a device is discontinued from the Market EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S National registrations for MDR certified devices in absence of EUDAMED EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Z MDR Class Ir deadline (Reusable surgical instruments) EU Medical Device Regulations 27
B MDR equvalent device - can you use a medicine as an equivalent 'device' EU Medical Device Regulations 8
N Harmonized Standards for MDR Certification EU Medical Device Regulations 7
K Is UDI (Unique Device Identifier) symbol mandatory under EU MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K EU MDR Annex 1 Chapter III: Information in the Instructions for Use-23.4 (e) the performance characteristics of the device; EU Medical Device Regulations 1
R Requirements for MDR Article 22 Systems EU Medical Device Regulations 1
H EU MDR Economic Operator notifications? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M MDR EU Distributor for our CE Mark product in the for Netherlands EU Medical Device Regulations 6
R Declaration of conformity as per EU MDR (2017/745) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
K Class III Kit Box - Are translations mandatory under EU MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
B Herbal ingredients MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S MDR GSPR Clause 17 - Software Requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 2
N Which EN ISO 17664 version compliance to EU MDR? Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 3
D Hospital Decontamination and the MDR - Technical Files, UDI and PMS EU Medical Device Regulations 3
K Submission of MDR File - Partner Companies - Computed Tomography (CT) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 10
B How to classify a medical device based on MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A MDR GSPR Checklist wanted EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Rincewind MDR - GSPR - Annex I - Chapter II EU Medical Device Regulations 2
N EU MDR - Applicability Article 22 Systems and Procedure Packs CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
B EU MDR Perscription product guidance EU Medical Device Regulations 1
cscalise Suggestions for MDR Auditing tools EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Example of statement for procedure pack MDR Article 22? Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 0
H MDD CM, MDR manufacturer. 2020. Is it ok? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
E UK MDR brexit out of sync with EU MDR deadline? UK Medical Device Regulations 4
S MDR Delay - MDD design Change? (before new MDR DOA) EU Medical Device Regulations 8

Similar threads

Top Bottom