Evaluating Subcontractor On-time Delivery

Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

Don Winton

#2
Dawn,

I do not know if the following is an “effective” way of rating suppliers. It is taken from the Quality Engineering Handbook (Edited by Thomas Pyzdek and Roger W. Berger 1992, pp. 188-189) and paraphrased here.
_________________________
Supplier rating elements and formula are as diverse as companies are. The common aspects are quality and delivery. The quality factor usually includes quality lot rating and quality part rating. The delivery factor usually includes timeliness rating and completeness rating.

Quality Lot Rating is not equal to number of lots rejected divided by the number of lots inspected and Quality Part Rating is not equal to number of parts rejected divided by the number of parts inspected.

The timeliness rating is based on the due date of the lot minus some demerit (e.g. 10%) for each day the lot is early or late beyond some specified grace period or window.

The completeness rating equals the number of parts actually received divided by the number of parts scheduled to be received.

The overall rating can be derived by assigning percentages to the above.

Quality lot rating at 40% and quality part rating at 60% equals the quality rating.

Timeliness rating at 50% and completeness rating at 50% equals the delivery rating.

Quality lot rating at 70% and Delivery rating at 30% equals an overall supplier rating.

This generic example can be expanded into an elaborate computerized system and can be tailored for use by the small business.
_________________________
I do not particularly care for the above description. Years ago (too many, I’m afraid) I found a different system. I will try to find that and forward if available. Not sure if it will be any better, but it may be worth a try. Personally, I think rating suppliers is way overrated (so to speak).

Best Regards,
Don
 
D
#3
Everyone talks about using something besides a list to track subcontractors, but I have never heard of how. Any suggestions?
Also, tracking 100% on-time delivery has posed a problem with us because we do alot of secondary work and sometimes the order has been changed by the customer, sometimes it is our fault, and documenting is incorrect. Our plant manager is giving us a real problem with this because he doesn't want to track this. Any ideas on how to make it easier?
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#4
Dawn said:
Everyone talks about using something besides a list to track subcontractors, but I have never heard of how. Any suggestions?
Also, tracking 100% on-time delivery has posed a problem with us because we do alot of secondary work and sometimes the order has been changed by the customer, sometimes it is our fault, and documenting is incorrect. Our plant manager is giving us a real problem with this because he doesn't want to track this. Any ideas on how to make it easier?
Just wondering - There are threads which address on-time delivery, but I don't remember any specific to subcontractors.

Your thoughts?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D What exactly is needed on the subcontractor list for evaluating subcontractors QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
Tagin Evaluating nonconformances for escalation using Bayesian methods? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
R Evaluating the need for preventive action Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 3
M Informational US FDA – FDA provides updates on the agency’s continued commitment to evaluating postmarket safety of Essure device Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
S Evaluating the possibilities of using qmswrapper or greenlightguru Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
C Evaluating GRR Scores %Tol vs %TV Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9
Q Evaluating Effectiveness of a Preventive Action after Closure Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 7
J Potential Customers Asking for EIRs / 483s when evaluating a CRO for future work US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
P FDA - Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
M Quality Control Procedure and Procedure for Evaluating Sub Contractor Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
M Evaluating Vendor (Supplier) Products using SQC Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
K Evaluating different Startup Options in EU and MDD ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Trading Company - Evaluating Supplier Performance and Approved Supplier List ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
J The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
E Evaluating Lean Knowledge: Lean Philosophy Course for Production Engineering Students Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 1
A Evaluating an Integrated Management System - Dissertation Topic ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
optomist1 Evaluating Capability Indices with Minitab Using Minitab Software 7
C Trend Analysis - Evaluating Quality of Pricing - ANVOA or Std Dev? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 25
W Re-Evaluating Corrective Actions - Recurrence of a Customer Complaint Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
D Good source for Checking and Evaluating Control Plans needed FMEA and Control Plans 4
R EMP (Evaluating the Measurement Process) Studies for Bias Effect Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
J Evaluating a Regression Model Using the Constant Variance Assumption Six Sigma 8
Wes Bucey "Downsizing" ramifications - Evaluating and Interpreting the News World News 0
A Methods of evaluating compliance to ISO 14001 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 6
M Evaluating my QMS (Quality Management System) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
G 100% Sort Verification - Statistical Method for Evaluating Suspect Material Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 19
J Evaluating and Reporting the Results of Layered Process Audits Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
Gert Sorensen Evaluating Software for GMP Criticality? Software Quality Assurance 3
M Evaluating adverse effect on device tested with out of tolerance instrument General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Q Evaluating Internal Audit Results Internal Auditing 24
P Rockwell, Brinell, Vickers Conversion - Evaluating Aluminum 6061-T6 and 6063-T6 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
U Evaluating the aspects... All judgement based or is there a more objective way? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 1
D Evaluating competence on training for new ISO 13485 standard for employees ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Q "Service" Vendor (Supplier) Evaluation - How are you evaluating suppliers? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
N Evaluating Process Stability - Unstable Processes - Cpk/Ppk? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
Z Seeking GM standard GM9684P - Procedure for evaluating parting lines Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
S Metrics for Evaluating Design process Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
C Evaluating software that measures Ppk, Cmk, Cpk, PPI, etc. Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
H Good starting point for a new QC Manager? Evaluating Existing Procedures Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
Gman2 Evaluating training, needed for office personnel? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
G Evaluating Processes - Cycle Time Concepts - Three Levels for any process Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
C Evaluating the Effectiveness of Internal Audit Process Internal Auditing 16
Marc Evaluating 5.3 c - Quality Policy - Framework General Auditing Discussions 1
T Evaluating Customer Satisfaction ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
B Risk Anlysis for Evaluating then Voiding or Not Issuing CPAR's Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
M ISO 9001:2000 - Evaluating Training Effectiveness and Why ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
C Can anyone suggest a means of evaluating a suppliers performance? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 4
Raffy Evaluation Form - Re-evaluating suppliers for their performance Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
G Evaluating Training Effectiveness - 6.2.2 Competence, Awareness and Training ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 55
S Supplier Evaluation - Evaluating transport suppliers and equipment suppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom