Evaluation of a Contract Manufacturer

1

1Noob

#1
Hi Almighty Quality Guru's

I was asked to go look at a CM that builds one of our products.
This was due to my testing of 150 units and 3 failures DOAs.

This actually the first time and I am unsure what to ask of them.
can anyone help me with a general line of questions I should ask?

So far this is what I have:
I will ask them for there test procedures.
How they track there failures & passes.
Ask them how the product is built and go through the line to see how they build it.

:frust:

Thanks for the help!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Re: Contract Manufacture

This doesn't appear to be a full audit so I think you are on the right track.
As you are going through the process you might want to ask about work instructions that their people use in the manufacture.

Can you give us an idea of the part and what industry you are in? we might be able to give you specific things to look for.
 

DannyK

Trusted Information Resource
#4
I would try to track the process from when they receive your company's PO to shipping.

I would try to track any specific requirements that are on or referenced on the your PO to see how they manage it and incorporate it into their system.

I would then proceed to planning and to manufacturing.

If they purchase parts, I would look for compliance to your bill of materials and how they perform receiving inspection.

Afterwards I would look at the manufacturing process and the controls in place.
Are there ESD controls ( if required)?
How does the company record nonconformances and failures?
Is the test and measuring equipment calibrated?
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
This was due to my testing of 150 units and 3 failures DOAs.
Not knowing the 3 failure types, and the focus being this., I would ask to look at their inprocess inspection and final inspection and their yield rates, corrective actions and traceability records. As an added area, I would ask to see their process validation plan, validation records and how these validation outputs gets into their work instructions. Competecy of people at areas that matter would be an other area to look in.
 

harry

Super Moderator
#6
......................... This actually the first time and I am unsure what to ask of them. can anyone help me with a general line of questions I should ask? .............................
Before you do anything, I think you need to know where you stand. Take a look at the agreement/contract between both parties.

When you see them, check if they had fulfilled their obligations as stipulated, If not, where, why? Ask them what's their proposal to overcome the issue.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#7
I would start with their corrective action and response to the failures. Otherwise you're just going fishing. Could be a simple visit where you hope to understand their process and confirm the implementation and effectiveness of their corrective action. Use it as a relationship builder, not a "gotcha." Good luck.
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#8
I've done this lots of times.
Some basic questions:

  1. do they provide components or assemblies?
  2. are n/c due to component failure or mis-assembly?
  3. if components, who supplies components?
  4. is there traceability of components? (sometimes suppliers do not maintain lot control)
  5. what documentation is available from supplier BEFORE your visit regarding the n/c and supplier's root cause and corrective action activity?
Once at the site:

  1. first impression - clean, neat, organized? or "the opposite?"
  2. your attitude - there to help find a solution or fix blame?
  3. their attitude - glad you came or distrustful and fearful?
  4. when you walk through the process from acceptance of order to delivery, does it seem logical and efficient or disorganized with lots of opportunities for distractions to the staff?
  5. what does the general attitude of workers seem - cheerful and efficient or harried and stressed?
  6. are the physical facilities comfortable or is it cold, hot, dirty, smelly?
  7. are the staff suitably dressed or does the apparel seem inappropriate to the task each performs?
  8. what's the in-process documentation of activity like - timely and accurate or filled in at the end of the shift by someone who was not part of the activity?
Details of a root cause analysis or corrective action are specific to the product and process - we need more detail than just the general industry of "Satellite receivers" - what, exactly, is supplied?
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#9
Hi Almighty Quality Guru's

I was asked to go look at a CM that builds one of our products.
This was due to my testing of 150 units and 3 failures DOAs.

This actually the first time and I am unsure what to ask of them.
can anyone help me with a general line of questions I should ask?

So far this is what I have:
I will ask them for there test procedures.
How they track there failures & passes.
Ask them how the product is built and go through the line to see how they build it.

:frust:

Thanks for the help!
Do you have the technical knowledge and experience to understand (a) the product failures (b) the probable causes and (c) the supplier's manufacturing processes and how they might have contributed to the failures? If the answer to any of the three is "No," you probably shouldn't be doing this alone.

This is not a knock against you personally, because everyone has to start somewhere, but if your management thinks it's a good idea to send inexperienced people by themselves on troubleshooting missions, this will probably be, at best, a wasted trip. If there's an experienced engineer in your company who might be available, there would be no shame in telling your boss(es) that you'd feel better having someone like that along. You'll have a valuable learning opportunity and there's a much better chance that the problems will be properly identified and solved.
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#10
Do you have the technical knowledge and experience to understand (a) the product failures (b) the probable causes and (c) the supplier's manufacturing processes and how they might have contributed to the failures? If the answer to any of the three is "No," you probably shouldn't be doing this alone.

This is not a knock against you personally, because everyone has to start somewhere, but if your management thinks it's a good idea to send inexperienced people by themselves on troubleshooting missions, this will probably be, at best, a wasted trip. If there's an experienced engineer in your company who might be available, there would be no shame in telling your boss(es) that you'd feel better having someone like that along. You'll have a valuable learning opportunity and there's a much better chance that the problems will be properly identified and solved.
Personally, I would prefer to send someone with technical expertise on product or process or both, but only if the supplier has kind of "thrown in the towel" and admitted an inability to resolve the situation on its own. It is one of the reasons I mentioned "attitude" in my previous post.

Third party auditors do not need technical competence in the product or process to determine if there is sufficient process and adherence to the process and thus decide if the process needs tweaking or if the operators need tweaking to follow the process.

The primary questions which seem to be missing from this thread are whether

  1. supplier acknowledges the n/c as valid
  2. supplier agrees the n/c originated in his shop, not in shipping or at customer or at one of his suppliers
  3. supplier has presented a cogent description of his efforts to date in trying to resolve the situation and has no solution
I absolutely agree that if the OP or any SQA feels out of his depth (needing more than just a tip in the right direction), he should be looking for more direct help than a couple of guys throwing random comments on an internet forum. As brilliant as those folks may be in person with hands and eyes on the situation, it is nearly impossible to convey the breadth and width of that knowledge and experience in a few pithy lines in an internet forum for an unseen situation.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
P Evaluation of personnel suppliers (Contract / Temporary - Engineers) Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
shimonv Clinical evaluation report for class I device EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A Applicability of Photobiological Safety Evaluation for LED used in medical devices Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1
P GSPRs / Clinical Evaluation EU Medical Device Regulations 3
silentmonkey Overall Benefit/Risk Analysis - Risk Management VS Clinical Evaluation ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
M NICE Medical Technology Evaluation Programme - Recommendations Service Industry Specific Topics 0
Q Summative Usability Evaluation Testing: prior or during Clinical Investigation? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 6
S Regular updates of clinical evaluation report EU Medical Device Regulations 6
K Surface finish (Evaluation Length) Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
M Clinical Evaluation Benchmark vs. Equivalent EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M IVDR and Performance Evaluation Plan CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
S User evaluation for self monitoring blood glucose test systems US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
S Australia TGA Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
S API Spec. Q1 clause 5.6.1.2 On site evaluation Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 10
B Biological evaluation plan and report Other Medical Device Related Standards 5
F Biocompatibility evaluation for Hardware/Interface Components? Other Medical Device Related Standards 12
B Clinical Evaluation Expert Panels - MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
T Clinical evaluation of a new medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 0
dgrainger Informational MDCG 2020:13 - Clinical evaluation assessment report template EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S A clinical performance evaluation study with an IVD product as Investagional Use product - Clinical Monitor requirements 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
B AS9100 8.4.1 Supplier Selection/Evaluation criteria and reevaluations AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 13
R Clinical evaluation without clinical data - MDR Article 61(10) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
M Clinical Evaluation Plan vs. PMCF Plan EU Medical Device Regulations 24
K Biocompatibility evaluation of gas pathways Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
T HF testing / Summative evaluation for MDDS class I necessary? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 2
N Evaluation of service providers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 2
M Can someone share a scrubbed version of Clinical Evaluation Plan (CEP) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
S EU MDR Annex XIV - Clinical Evaluation Plan - What do these methods mean? EU Medical Device Regulations 16
C Material from outside CER evaluation period CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 8
DitchDigger IEC 60601-1 subclause 5.1 - Adequate evaluation in lieu of testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
S Clinical Evaluation - Is this an ISO 13485:2016 requirement? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
P SOUP anomaly evaluation for MMA (Mobile Medical Application) IEC 62304 clause 7.1.3 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 6
M Informational How to perform a clinical evaluation of medical devices – Part 2 – Level of clinical evidence and what sufficient clinical evidence means Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 9
P IEC 62304 - evaluation of integration and system testing IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 4
R Supplier evaluation and business needs in the context of ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
U Changes to Internal Processes and Risk Evaluation - Mitigations Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 10
M Informational Work in progress at the FDA for biological evaluation – Color Hazard and RISk calculator (CHRIS) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational How to perform a clinical evaluation of medical devices – Part 1 – Overview and sample of activities Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
T EU MDR Article 61- Clinical Evaluation EU Medical Device Regulations 2
pashah Looking for Clinical Evaluation SOP acc. MEDDEV and EU MDR Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
K Supplier re-evaluation (API Q1) Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
B Evaluation of Basic Safety during EMC Immunity or Climate Testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
S ISO 10993 Biocompatibility Evaluation - Electronic thermometer Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
D Clinical Evaluation Report - Consultant Recommendations Consultants and Consulting 9
qualprod ISO 9001 Clause 9.1 - Monitoring measurement analysis and evaluation ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
M CER (Clinical Evaluation Reports) updates - Product Codes EU Medical Device Regulations 2
A Medical device CER (clinical evaluation report) training/seminar services EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Informational US – National Evaluation System for Health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc) Solicits Public Comments for Data Quality and Methods Frameworks Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational IMDRF – Proposed update to Clinical Evaluation documents Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational MDCG 2019-3 Interpretation of Article 54(2)b – Pre- market clinical evaluation consultation procedure with the involvement of expert panels Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom