Evidence of Review and Approval

S

Shannon

#1
We have an adequate review and approval process for document control but don't necessarily have objective evidence to prove it. A). Should we include the name of the reviewer in the footer, B). Should we document the review and approval process in a controlled document, or C). Do we need "objective evidence" at all or will our control of the documents be the proof?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

Jim Biz

#2
Our situation - and my personal opinion is that we took the issue to an extreame.

We show review and apprroval of documents (and their attached/listed reference materials) by our 4.5 procedure language that says - "the ISO Manager will draft/Review the document to the stadards and show approval by signature/The Plant Manager will compare wording to avctual practices and aprove by signature and the Responsible Area Manager will do the same... No document is deemed "Reviewed/APPROVED/or part of the ISO system unless and until it is signed by all responsible parties and recorded in the ISO guy's master list. (there must be a better way - Grin)
 
E

eskay

#3
Shannon/Jim

The procedure we follow is simple (I think)!. Our document approval/review process says, "concerned department head will write/review the procedure and the QA Chairperson (thats me) will approve the same for adequacy and suitability for use".

All such documents, till the time incorporated into the QA manual, will be marked as "preliminary". Our documents will show the revision date/revision number/person revised.

Hope this is clear.

Kannan
 
D

David Mullins

#4
An adequate process with no records!!
Now if we could just get rid of customer requirements!!!

Originator/reviewer/approver/authoriser/etc. - none of these people have to appear on the document. The document must have an individual ID, by which it is controlled. It must be reviewed and approved - this can be confirmation by email or a note on a burger wrapper, so long as that's what the procedure says (yes it must be described in a controlled procedure), and the proof is available. Personally I find people signing off directly on the original document itself the quickest way, but it isn't in keeping with the technological advances made to control documents, increase your IT staff levels, blowing capital on computer storage space, speed and software updates, and making quality people even more of an enigma.

Document control consumes too much time as it is. Why make the simple things more complex?

It must be time for my medication, but one more thing. Review and approve at the correct level for a document. Managers don't have sufficient intimacy with shop floor processes to review documents at this level, however approval may be appropriate for them. Likewise, approval of system level documents should be tasked to the most senior person in the organisation who can hold a pen, press a keyboard, or eat a burger.

Cheers.

------------------
 

barb butrym

Quite Involved in Discussions
#5
I have gone from red lines on the controlled document signed and dated to the electronic magic of passwords and email with electroic change forms and attachments...it all depends on what makes sense for the task at hand.

A simple company of a few souls and one set of procedures sure does not command the same detail as one of several hundred souls with control stations through out the plant.

Sometimes a combination is the best way...then use a matrix to detail which doc type requires what type of control/review and by whom.....

And yes, you do need evidence

[This message has been edited by barb butrym (edited 26 April 2000).]
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Showing Evidence of Review and Approval of Blank Forms and Templates 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
M Informational US FDA paper – Epidemiological Evidence on the Adverse Health Effects Reports in Relation to Mercury from Dental Amalgam: Systematic Literature Review Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
W Evidence for Review of Requirements - AS9100 Clause 7.2.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S Evidence of Contract Review for External Calibration Laboratory Contract Review Process 7
S Objective Evidence of Review Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
D Device functionality over service life - Objective evidence required? Design and Development of Products and Processes 10
C MDCG 2020-06 Clinical evidence legacy devices EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Mr Roo ISO 9001 - 7.1.3 Infrastructure - questions concerning evidence ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
M Informational Critical Thinking and the Process of Evidence-Based Practice Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational How to perform a clinical evaluation of medical devices – Part 2 – Level of clinical evidence and what sufficient clinical evidence means Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 9
S Level of Clinical Evidence - MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
qualprod Evidence of a talk or phone call in approvals? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
H Clinical evidence for Class II medical devices in EU and US EU Medical Device Regulations 5
CPhelan Using clinical trial safety data for evidence for CE marking EU Medical Device Regulations 7
N Best practices for capturing audit objective evidence in a practical manner? Internal Auditing 3
M Informational Health Canada – Guidance Document: Supporting Evidence for Implantable Medical Devices Manufactured by 3D Printing Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
R Timeframe for IATF 16949 certification to accumulate evidence of conformance of systems? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M Informational TGA – Q&A: Use of market authorisation evidence from comparable overseas regulatory bodies for medical devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
E ISO 9001:2015 Clause 10.2.2 - Evidence of all nonconformities and actions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
R 8.1.3 Management of change - Evidence of HIRA and related things Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 3
Q Evidence of precautions (clinical evaluation report, risk management report) EU Medical Device Regulations 6
S Ways to demonstrate objective evidence that employee is trained and competent ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 28
mikinnear Evidence - Class IIb Disinfectant Sanitiser EU Medical Device Regulations 2
G FAI Objective Evidence AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
R Interested parties requirements - Evidence of control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
K Is evidence of second party audits required for every supplier? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
J MDR and Creative Clinical Evidence Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
B IATF 16949 Cl. 9.2.2.1 - Internal audit program - Types of evidence Internal Auditing 1
E IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.1 - Documented information as evidence of fitness for purpose IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Q How to provide evidence of Strategic Direction (Easy) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
B IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.6 - Organizational Knowledge - What evidence to have? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
D No evidence of certain processes on our scope being audited at our remote location IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
R CAPA Verification - ISO 13485:2016 Requirements and Objective Evidence ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
R What kind of Objective Evidence - AS9100 Cl. 7.1.6 - Organizational Knowledge AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
Q Informational Context of the Organization & Interested Parties Evidence - ISO 9001:2015 Cl. 4.1/4.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 82
O ISO 9001:2015 4.4.1 - Providing Evidence of QMS Processes "Shalls" ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
A Type of evidence for Mandatory procedures 4.4.2 A ad 8.5.1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M Clinical Evidence - Clinical Evaluation Report for Class I medical devices EU Medical Device Regulations 1
L AIs the R&R study a training evidence considered ? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
R What objective evidence can/can't be supplied during a customer audit? General Auditing Discussions 3
L Audit Ethics and Practices regarding Evidence Internal Auditing 18
S Evidence of Competence, Training and Awareness Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 5
S Design and Development Document evidence for Engineering Consultant ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
Chennaiite Audit Objective Evidence - the holy **** Imported Legacy Blogs 1
J Evidence of ISO Training for all Employees Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 27
K Evidence for Language Knowledge of Employees Professional Certifications and Degrees 9
S What would be the evidence for trained/competent inspectors? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
Q Closing Out a Corrective Action - Strictly what is an Evidence? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 8
T Safety and Effectiveness of Medical Device - What evidence needed? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T Clause 7.4.1.2 - Evidence of annual assessments for all non-TS Suppliers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 16

Similar threads

Top Bottom