Evolving Quality Levels - Expectations for Lowered Defect Levels

P

PaulJSmith

#1
I saw this come up in another discussion, and it seemed like it could support it's own discussion.

This is an issue many of us are facing today. Increasing quality expectations bring us to defect levels that are too low for reasonable sampling plans to detect and now we use 100% inspection and/or capturing failures on the line. The concept of an acceptable defect rate is becoming extinct. Unfortunately the processes that govern how we handle this have not kept up.
So, how are you keeping up with these ever tightening demands?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
B

bigqman

#2
I was struck by Bev's comment also. The answer: it depends!. I'm thinking of Juran's break-even chart which shows the intersection of sales increase (increase assumed), profits, and total costs. (And by the way you can see this chart on-line at ASQ - 7th edition of Handbook recently out - sample chapter page 8). Given sales and profits - are quality related costs acceptable with current sampling plan and resources AND do we know the customer's perceived level of satisfaction?
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#3
It's a challenge. Many processes aren't designed to get 100% perfection. The cost to get that last little bit, 95 to 100, is exponential. You need to pick you process in line with the capabilities you require, or can afford.
 
P

PaulJSmith

#4
I agree, Golfman25 ... when it's your company's decision. But, what about when it's customer driven?
 

normzone

Trusted Information Resource
#5
It's a challenge. Many processes aren't designed to get 100% perfection. The cost to get that last little bit, 95 to 100, is exponential. You need to pick you process in line with the capabilities you require, or can afford.
My wife manages in a retail situation where the business model consists of giving away a significant volume of the product as free samples, and the resources plan is maintain a skeleton staff year round and staff up with seasonal minions through the holiday season - I'll let you name the organization. Clue: Warren Buffet thought that the model works so well he bought the place.

She gets frustrated with the level of efficiency, which is further impeded by corporate policies and practices. I have to remind her not to stress out over that - the model is designed to be adequately profitable with a lot of slop in the system, and Warren is happy with it.

:popcorn:
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#7
I agree, Golfman25 ... when it's your company's decision. But, what about when it's customer driven?
That's the problem. Many are clueless when it comes to processes. So they pick the least expensive process and then complain about "defects." Customers need to know what they are buying. You need to manage expectations.

I have a customer who gave new parts for a large OEM. "Zero defects" and cpk is the mantra. We took a look and told them they where crazy. They made a few changes and went with the cheap guy down the street. A few years later, they came back and paid up for tooling with a lot of "just in case" designed into it. So that's all fine and dandy. But all of the sudden we got a lot of "rejections." One or two pcs. at a time for dings and dents. After a few years of this, we find out the parts are being sent out for additional processing and sometimes the boxes are damaged during shipping. Well duh. It isn't us. At the end of the day, even without the damaged boxes the part is too thin to withstand the shipping process -- its a design issue. We still get the "rejections."
 

RoxaneB

Change Agent and Data Storyteller
Super Moderator
#8
When it's customer-driven, I wish I could say it was a simple as firing the customer. :cool: Now that I'm in a not-for-profit healthcare organization with one key funder for the bulk of our business, we do not have the luxury of distancing ourselves from their business.

What we can do is attempt to educate them on the lack of alignment between their targets and the amount of business that comes our way.

For example, we have a contractual target of 0.05% for a particular aspect of our business, Missed Care. This is essential when we agree to do the visit in the Client's home, however we fail to arrive to provide care - with some exceptions - and fail to reschedule the visit per the service plan. I'd share the exact definition with you, but it would make many of you go cross-eyed. :bonk:

Now some of our market areas are low in volume while being large in geographic coverage, yet the target is the same across the board. If this area has 300 scheduled visits per week, we are allowed to miss 0.15 visit...essentially 0. No one is allowed to get sick or have a car breakdown or get lost. No one is allowed to be...well...human. These low volume, large geography areas also pose a struggle in finding qualified and competent staff (especially as hospitals pay better and have better working conditions than working out in the community).

When we receiving a nonconformance regarding failure to meet the contractual target, there are often things we can do on our end, but part of our response includes re-communicating the concerns with the mandated target.

We have not lost business...they give us the nonconformance, we address it to the best of our ability, the eventually close it and the cycle repeats. They'd be able to do their job more effectively if they would understand the merits of capacity and capability and smart statistics, but until then... :frust:
 
P

PaulJSmith

#9
We have not lost business...they give us the nonconformance, we address it to the best of our ability, the eventually close it and the cycle repeats. They'd be able to do their job more effectively if they would understand the merits of capacity and capability and smart statistics, but until then... :frust:
Wow. :nope: The very definition of "going through the motions" right there. It is regrettable that you have to deal with that. Nothing will ever get fixed as long as bureaucrats are only interested in making sure the paperwork is complete. Definitely a good example of unrealistic expectations.
 

Mike S.

Happy to be Alive
Trusted Information Resource
#10
99.8% has been the required quality target for our biggest customer for years. Below that, you get lots of “help” from the customer and less new business. It is darn hard to meet, and it has taken lots of different tools for us to get there.

Part of the answer is forming good relationships with the customer’s QE’s that I have to deal with. With targets like this, every little bit helps, and if you are able to form a good relationship and are proven to be an honest and trustworthy person, sometimes you get the benefit of the doubt when the cause is in that grey area between “their fault” or “our fault” or “purge stock” or “no need”.

Also, just like your sampling plan, the customer will usually not detect every nonconforming part. If it is something minor like the flange on a part is .003” OOT but it still fits when the mechanic grabs the part to bolt it on, no one knows. Does that mean you can or should “slip in” those bad parts and try to sneek them past your customer? No! But in reality, no matter what way you measure quality, you are not likely catching every defect, and neither are the customers. What you measure is best-case.

And of course it takes good old fashioned, best-effort based on what you can afford to do and still stay in business, QA and QC practices. Take PA and CA seriously. Hire good people. Treat them well. Walk the talk.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
V Evolving QA from 'Compliance-based' to 'Science/Risk-based' approach US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
M Tracking Materials and Tooling - Evolving to Real Life Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 8
RoxaneB How is your BMS (Business Management System) evolving? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
N Quality Inspection Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 10
O Quality Management System Implementation framework and Gap analysis checklist Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
R Statistical Methods for comparing test and reference product equivalence for quality attributes US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
Thee Bouyyy Quality Management System Q1 and Q2 Interpretations Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
Sidney Vianna Informational ISO/CD 7101 Health Care Quality Management System Standard Hospitals, Clinics & other Health Care Providers 0
K MHLW MO169 2021 Japan Ministerial Ordinance on Standards for Manufacturing Control and Quality Control for Medical Devices and In-Vitro Diagnostics Japan Medical Device Regulations 2
Nihls Quality Control (stability) Chart for CMM's - How the control limits are to be calculated Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
M How to manage Sop's & other quality documents after business transfer Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
F So my quality management position is being marginalized by my job. Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 10
P Does FDA require certification for quality system internal audit for auditor? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
R Quality adjusting inventory in ERP system AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 14
T Add checking aid to quality systems Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
A Quality's Authority - Company Moving In ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
S ISO9001 QMS: Quality Manual Examples & Templates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
M Quality Manager - Aerospace/Defense Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 1
U Need Help With API Q2 Quality Manual Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 8
Evelyn7E Quality is everybody's responsibility Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 29
F Quality Control in Electrical Calibration ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
Q Product Quality vs Product Defects Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
A Final quality control corrective actions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
D Question on Supplier Quality (SCAR) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Recommended software to send Quality scorecards to suppliers (external providers) Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
G How to implement H&S and Quality Control Requirements in Contract for Potential Supplier? Contract Review Process 6
O What skills are most important for a new Quality Manager Career and Occupation Discussions 15
MSeibert47 Daily Quality Topics - Need Ideas Please! Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 18
P Quality and Regulatory organizational structure Consultants and Consulting 2
P Examples of quality plans in IEC 62304 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
bobdoering Most typical universal Quality System Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 8
F Need Quality Manager advice. Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
Sidney Vianna ISO 9001 News ISO 9001 Quality Check - spinning facts in LinkedIn ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
S Quality assurance area Manufacturing and Related Processes 11
C Quality Management System Question ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 32
K Quality Control/Assurance in the Metal Industry Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 10
C Quality Manager as part of Management - 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
Marc Quality Assurance Specialists Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
B Quality Manager Retiring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
S Outsourced storage Quality Agreement ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
G Does FDA allows remote approvals of quality documentation. Is there any specific guidance on signing any quality records remotely? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
N Guidance - Cost of Good Quality Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
D Quality plan for moving locations ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
was named killer Job Opportunity-Quality Engineer-Tampa Florida Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
Marc Job Opportunity – Quality Assurance Specialist - Suspense 7 April 2021 Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
C Requirement to link Quality Manual to ISO 9001 clause numbers? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
normhowe "The Problem with Quality Management: Process orientation, controllability and zero-defect processes as modern myths" Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 2
J Quality Objective for QMS prior to Certification AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
J Quality Objectives and resources ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
M PSA Suppliers - CSR matrix and need the quality manual of PSA APQP and PPAP 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom