SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

Executive summary for Traditional 510(k)

#1
Hi, I hope somebody could help me solve my dilemma.

We are currently preparing 510(k) Traditional submission and I have a checklist and content of the submission. In some documents, and on some blogs, I've seen executive summary being mentioned. The thing that puzzles me the most is that it is essentially the same like the 510(k) summary. So, my question is - is it still necessary to write an executive summary or it is something that has been used previously and it is not applicable anymore?

I remember sending out the Special few months ago and we didn't send the executive summary.

Thanks in advance.
Cheers!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
We completed a traditional 510k last year.

We tried to 'go by the book' to smooth our path - that is we tried to match our submission exactly to guidance documents.
It had separate sections titled 'Summary' and 'Executive Summary', although they are pretty similar.

Note that your submission is likely to be 'split up' that is different sections will go to different desks, so some repetition may assist this process.

Note also, the section called 'Summary' will be the part that is copied to the publically available 510k database. Checking on what your chosen predicate has published there should give you an idea of what is needed (particularly if your predicate is reasonably modern).
 
#3
We completed a traditional 510k last year.

We tried to 'go by the book' to smooth our path - that is we tried to match our submission exactly to guidance documents.
It had separate sections titled 'Summary' and 'Executive Summary', although they are pretty similar.

Note that your submission is likely to be 'split up' that is different sections will go to different desks, so some repetition may assist this process.

Note also, the section called 'Summary' will be the part that is copied to the publically available 510k database. Checking on what your chosen predicate has published there should give you an idea of what is needed (particularly if your predicate is reasonably modern).
Thanks for the answer!
We are trying to do the same thing - do everything according to the checklist and guidance to avoid even minor bumps on the road. However, this one bothered me since it is virtually the same thing (more modern summaries have all the sections of the executive, even the depth).
I'm aware that summary goes public after the clearance, but I just wanted to have some kind confirmation of my thinking.
All the best.
 

katiesam

Starting to get Involved
#4
We gained 510k clearance last year. Our submission had a Summary section, which gave very basic information (being that it is made public) and an executive summary. This was a longer section which included the device's intended use and function (I included an image of the product here), along with summary comparisons in respect of technical characteristics, biocompatibility and performance testing. I also discussed any differences between our device and the predicate.
Our submission went straight through without any issues.
 
#5
We gained 510k clearance last year. Our submission had a Summary section, which gave very basic information (being that it is made public) and an executive summary. This was a longer section which included the device's intended use and function (I included an image of the product here), along with summary comparisons in respect of technical characteristics, biocompatibility and performance testing. I also discussed any differences between our device and the predicate.
Our submission went straight through without any issues.
Katiesam, thanks for the advice. I hope we will go through without any problem as yours did!
 

katiesam

Starting to get Involved
#6
Katiesam, thanks for the advice. I hope we will go through without any problem as yours did!
It sounds like you have been very thorough. The best advice we had was to make sure that in reading all the documents the lead reviewer would be able to sleep at night knowing that the device was as safe and effective as the predicate. Our submission contained so many summary tables and images, schematics etc. probably more than necessary but it was worth it to get through in the 90 days.
We did go to interactive review and were questioned on one aspect, but we sent back a one paragraph answer which was sufficient. This didn't hold up the process at all and it is always good to realise that there are real people at the other end! We have only had positive experiences with the FDA so far. I am still waiting for an answer on my query about extending the scope of the indications for use, but have had another email to say that they haven't forgotten. It will become the responsibility of another division so that is the hold up in the answer.
Best of luck with your submission. :)
 
#7
It sounds like you have been very thorough. The best advice we had was to make sure that in reading all the documents the lead reviewer would be able to sleep at night knowing that the device was as safe and effective as the predicate. Our submission contained so many summary tables and images, schematics etc. probably more than necessary but it was worth it to get through in the 90 days.
We did go to interactive review and were questioned on one aspect, but we sent back a one paragraph answer which was sufficient. This didn't hold up the process at all and it is always good to realise that there are real people at the other end! We have only had positive experiences with the FDA so far. I am still waiting for an answer on my query about extending the scope of the indications for use, but have had another email to say that they haven't forgotten. It will become the responsibility of another division so that is the hold up in the answer.
Best of luck with your submission. :)
Yes, it does really help to know that there are some nice reviewers. We had luck with ours on our last Special 510(k). And I really respect this aspect of communication through e-mails, because it is so much easier to get a piece of information. Thanks again. :)
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R 510(k) Executive Summary vs 510(k) Summary - Differences 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
R CAPA 4-panel or 4-pane for Executive Summary Presentation Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
L How to write Executive Summary for Health Canada medical device applications Canada Medical Device Regulations 4
K Top Executive Management ISO 9001:2015 and IATF 16949 Overview IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
M Executive and Supervisor - Responsibilities and Differences Career and Occupation Discussions 3
M Free Executive Overview Webinar on ISO 14001 on Thu, Feb 21, 2013 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
H Definition Executive Responsibility - Legal Definition Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 11
M New appointment as Quality Assurance Executive - Job Scope Career and Occupation Discussions 3
S Executive Management Review Meeting ? Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 1
Marc UK Executive Forced Out of Job For Posting Resume On LinkedIn Career and Occupation Discussions 2
L Timeline For Corrective Action for those in Executive Management Positions Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
T High Productivity Engineering - Project Execution Model vs. Project Executive Plan Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
A Questions asked in an interview for QA executive in a Biomedical Company Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 11
S Executive Management Participation in Internal Audits Internal Auditing 8
Wes Bucey Don't be a victim - High-level executive jobs Career and Occupation Discussions 2
G Health & Safety Executive - ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 Confusion Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
Sidney Vianna Boeing Executive Faults some 787 Suppliers World News 17
ScottK A Spike in Executive Resume Falsification? Career and Occupation Discussions 3
T Preparing Quality Management System Reviews for the Executive Management Group ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
Randy New Presidential Executive Order for United States Federal Agencies Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 16
D North American Aviation founding executive Ralph Ruud dies World News 0
Marc Verizon Executive Calls for End to Google's 'Free Lunch' After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 2
RoxaneB What is your interest in an Executive MBA programme? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 26
M Auditing Management - Do I need to interview anyone in Executive Management? General Auditing Discussions 6
Randy The US Government and EMS - Executive Order 13148 - April 22, 2000 Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 8
S IATF 16949 - Summary at a glance Clause wise - changes from ISO TS IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
A How can we change a device trade name in 510(k) summary? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
Watchcat Summary of De Novo Biocompatibility Information, 2015-2018 Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
D Test summary report example for design validation wanted - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
Watchcat DE NOVO SUMMARY - IVDs and Radiology Devices, 2015-2018 Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
Watchcat De novo Summary (ODE 2015-2018) Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
M Informational MDCG 2019-9 Summary of safety and clinical performance A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies – August 2019 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
D Summary of safety and clinical performance in GSPR MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Informational US FDA – MDR Data Files – Alternative Summary Report Data Since 1999 Available Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational EU – Hearing on the SCHEER preliminary Guidelines on the presence of Phthalates in certain medical devices (Brussels, 04 April 2019) – Summary records Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
A Minitab 18: How to automate GRR Summary Table save Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1
M Informational RIVM – Summary International Expert Meeting on breast implant-associated lymphoma Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
A Summary of safety and clinical performance (SSCP) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
D MDR and Summary Technical Documentation Files EU Medical Device Regulations 18
M MDR Clinical Evaluation & investigation (SUMMARY of changes) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
S 510(k) statement or 510(k) summary ? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
shimonv Summary of FDA Guidance on “Medical Device Accessories” (Dec 2016) Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
L A "good" non-parametric test summary? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 0
L ISO 9001:2015 Correlation Matrix & Change Summary ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
A Does anyone have experience providing a summary of Pre-IDE discussions in the 510k US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
S Internal Audit Findings Summary Rewrite by an Auditee ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
S RAPS Article on STED (Summary Technical Documents) Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
R What should be the content or elements of an MDR Evaluation Summary? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T Are Control Plans "Summary Documents" not meant to replace Work Instructions? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
J Does anyone have a summary of changes made to ISO 11137-2? Other Medical Device Related Standards 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom