SBS - The best value in QMS software

FDA Medical Device Label Requirements - serial numbers

C

closdebois09

#1
Hello all,

I've spent the greater part of my entire day and evening trying to find a clear answer to provide to my manager on Monday about the requirements for including serial numbers, manufacturing date, expiry date, lot/batch number, etc. on medical device labeling.

We already know the standard information that is required on the label such as, name and place of business of us (mfg.), including street address, city, state, zip code, etc. etc.

The primary concern is what is required in our UDI. I know from my research that the UDI for our type of device consists of two parts: DI and the PI. The PI is a conditional, variable portion of the UDI that identifies any one or more of five aspects (lot/batch, serial number, expiration, manufacture date, HCT/P ID number) IF those aspects are on the device label.

My question is...what dictates which of these five aspects we include on our device labeling? This is a class II device, it is reusable, electrified, non-sterile device that's intended purpose is therapeutic (physical medicine) in nature (not in-vitro diagnostic). Also, this device does not meet the requirements for traceability as defined in 820.65 as it is not intended for surgical implant into the body or to support or sustain life.

This is a new device that is still in the design phase so we are just now starting to consider labeling, which is why we are just now starting to think about what information we should include on the labeling and within our UDI.

I realize that the dFMEA will play a role in the content of our labeling, but is it just that or is there more for us to go on (guidance document I possibly haven't come across?) to determine, for instance, if it's most appropriate to include the serial number versus just the lot/batch number? I will say that it has been expressed by members of our team that the preference is to not include the serial number as long as we include the lot/batch number (our lots are relatively small, if that matters to you), so I'm trying to formulate an educated opinion on whether to support that or not.

One person within our organization has mentioned that the choice to include the serial number versus the lot number is to help limit the scope of a recall. I've no experience with recalls (thankfully but also not), so I can't even really say if thats a true statement. I feel like the root cause of the recall and our specific manufacturing process would have more to do with the scope of the recall than the identifier used to trace a single device for which we've identified an issue. I feel as though regardless of whether we have the lot number or the serial number on the label, one of the two should be sufficient. I prefer we use the lot number (no reason other than that's what I've seen before which means little to nothing), but really just want to do what is best. What would be a justifiable reason for having both the lot and the serial number on the label (and therefore in the UDI), or is it the opinion that one of the two are sufficient?

Any help is appreciated!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Al Rosen

Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
Hello all,

I've spent the greater part of my entire day and evening trying to find a clear answer to provide to my manager on Monday about the requirements for including serial numbers, manufacturing date, expiry date, lot/batch number, etc. on medical device labeling.

We already know the standard information that is required on the label such as, name and place of business of us (mfg.), including street address, city, state, zip code, etc. etc.

The primary concern is what is required in our UDI. I know from my research that the UDI for our type of device consists of two parts: DI and the PI. The PI is a conditional, variable portion of the UDI that identifies any one or more of five aspects (lot/batch, serial number, expiration, manufacture date, HCT/P ID number) IF those aspects are on the device label.

My question is...what dictates which of these five aspects we include on our device labeling? This is a class II device, it is reusable, electrified, non-sterile device that's intended purpose is therapeutic (physical medicine) in nature (not in-vitro diagnostic). Also, this device does not meet the requirements for traceability as defined in 820.65 as it is not intended for surgical implant into the body or to support or sustain life.

This is a new device that is still in the design phase so we are just now starting to consider labeling, which is why we are just now starting to think about what information we should include on the labeling and within our UDI.

I realize that the dFMEA will play a role in the content of our labeling, but is it just that or is there more for us to go on (guidance document I possibly haven't come across?) to determine, for instance, if it's most appropriate to include the serial number versus just the lot/batch number? I will say that it has been expressed by members of our team that the preference is to not include the serial number as long as we include the lot/batch number (our lots are relatively small, if that matters to you), so I'm trying to formulate an educated opinion on whether to support that or not.

One person within our organization has mentioned that the choice to include the serial number versus the lot number is to help limit the scope of a recall. I've no experience with recalls (thankfully but also not), so I can't even really say if thats a true statement. I feel like the root cause of the recall and our specific manufacturing process would have more to do with the scope of the recall than the identifier used to trace a single device for which we've identified an issue. I feel as though regardless of whether we have the lot number or the serial number on the label, one of the two should be sufficient. I prefer we use the lot number (no reason other than that's what I've seen before which means little to nothing), but really just want to do what is best. What would be a justifiable reason for having both the lot and the serial number on the label (and therefore in the UDI), or is it the opinion that one of the two are sufficient?

Any help is appreciated!
In my opinion, you should use either the lot number or serial number, not both. Using both is unnecessarily complicated. If you have small lots, use the lot/batch number. I don't know your manufacturing process and where in your process you apply your labels or if you know the serial number of each device at the beginning of the process. Recalls occur infrequently, but you have to live with the process every day, so do what's easier for you while still meeting the requirements.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Medical Device Contract Manufacturer - Does the CM need to register with FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
P Anyone have an Idea on UAE Medical device registeration- Class B with FDA only Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
A FDA guidance on non-sterile Medical Device Packaging Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
I How to classify a medical device based on FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
S The US FDA requirements on Disposal of a medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
S FDA Requirements for Medical Device Label Reconciliation 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B FDA-Medical Device Reporting (MDR )procedure compliant with 21CFR section 803 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
J FDA wants electrical safety testing on battery powered medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 11
D FDA Approved Class II Medical Device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 11
R When does the FDA consider a component a medical device? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 17
T Clinical trial - Medical device product not cleared (without FDA approval) in a drug trial Other US Medical Device Regulations 9
M Informational US FDA Draft Guidance – Patient Engagement in Design and Conduct of Medical Device Clinical Investigations Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Sam Lazzara Medical Device File (MDF per 13485:2016 4.2.3) versus FDA Device Master Record (DMR) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Informational US FDA Final Guidance – Consideration of Uncertainty in Making Benefit-Risk Determinations in Medical Device Premarket Approvals, De Novo Classificati Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational US FDA Medical Device User Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2020 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational How the FDA Uses Science to Speed Medical Device Innovation Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
L A Taiwan company want to sell Class I medical device (510(k) exempt) on Amazon, should we register with FDA? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
M Informational US FDA – Statement on agency’s efforts to increase transparency in medical device reporting Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational US FDA – Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Medical Device Decision Making Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational US FDA Guidance update – Requests for Feedback and Meetings for Medical Device Submissions: The Q-Submission Program Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M How to Select FDA Medical Device Product Code? Other US Medical Device Regulations 10
J FDA Class 1 Medical Device UDI requirements Other US Medical Device Regulations 19
M Informational US FDA – Patient Preference Information (PPI) in Medical Device Decision-Making Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
R US FDA Mandatory Labelling contents for an OTC medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
M Informational FDA Qualifies First Biomarker Test as Part of Medical Device Development Tools (MDDT) Program Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Ed Panek Website to ask FDA for guidance in Medical Device Industry? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
J Referencing Medical Device in FDA records - Package contains several other components Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
N Per the FDA regulations can a medical device be class I despite that it is sterile? Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
S FDA approval process for medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
M FDA News The FDA Issues Final Rule on Medical Device Classification Procedures Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
R How to keep track of all FDA rules and regulations for medical device companies 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
M FDA Considers Shift on Medical Device Quality System Regulations - 2018 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
N Does FDA allow comparing with the competitors Medical Device 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
shimonv Summary of FDA Guidance on “Medical Device Accessories” (Dec 2016) Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
I The likelihood of approval by the FDA for a Class II Medical Device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 8
B Will FDA Inspect a New Coating Supplier for a Class III Combination Medical Device? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
F CE and FDA Mark on same IVD/Medical Device Label EU Medical Device Regulations 12
S FDA Class I Medical Device Safety and Efficacy Data Requirements Other US Medical Device Regulations 5
I FDA Class II Medical Device Clinical Trials and and FDA IDE Requirements US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
B FDA Listing of a Class I Medical Device in USA (Manufactured in China) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 10
Ronen E FDA encourages industry to participate in Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Other US Medical Device Regulations 10
M IEC 62304, ISO 14971 and FDA Medical Device SW Guidance 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
F EU Useability Study for FDA? Class II Medical Device IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 10
I FDA Medical Device Registration - Scenario - Two Companies 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
somashekar FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessory Risk Assessment Other US Medical Device Regulations 15
T FDA Requirements - Class 1 Exempt Medical Device Recall ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
I FDA FURLS Medical Device Listing Naming Scheme 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
A What to expect if FDA wants to inspect a Class 1 Medical Device Manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
A FDA Medical Device Reprocessing Guidance - Validation US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom