SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessory Risk Assessment

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#1
FDA proposing to regulate medical device accessories based on the risks they present when used as intended with their parent devices and not based on the risks of their parent devices. For example, if a parent device warrants regulation as a Class II device but an accessory to the parent device presents lower risks, FDA would regulate the accessory as a Class I rather than a Class II device.
This could be helpful and useful to a lot of manufacturer's..
Read more HERE
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Chrisx

Involved In Discussions
#2
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

At least for me the guidance is not helpful at all. We manufacture spinal implants, with a complete line of surgical instruments designed to be used with the implant. For example, this might be a screwdriver. According to this guidance, the screwdriver might be a class I device product code HXX. Alternatively, the FDA might decide on the basis of risk that it is to be regulated as an accessory to the implant. Product code HXX is exempt from design controls, but spinal implants are not. I can never be sure if the instruments are subject to design controls. FDAs suggestion is that I submit a de novo for every instrument we manufacture to determine the device classification. This is a practical way to determine device classification for a simple surgical instrument!:mad:

Furthermore, the guidance doesn't really describe how a class II device accessory is to be regulated. Does the screwdriver need its own 510(k)? Does it require predicate? What if I change the material of the screwdriver, does this require a special 510(K)? Where would I find the predicate for the screwdriver, since code HXX is exempt from premarket notification.

Of course, I have picked an extreme example by selecting the screwdriver. However there are many instruments. Product codes have no definition with them to help understand what device applies. For example, there is a product code HXE for "fork". A rod fork is a fork shaped device used with pedicle screws for distraction. Does a rod fork belong to code HXE? It becomes very hard to know whether a device will be considered an orthopedic manual surgical instrument according to 21CFR888.4540 or an accessory. One can never know for sure when design controls or premarket notification is required. Too bad FDA can't agree to classify accessories on their own, like most other countries.
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#3
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

I agree that what's missing is more guidance as to what are the implications of accessories.

For example, I have a system that consists of a Class II device (parent), and a remote-control ("accessory"), which have gone through 510k.
So, under the system 510k, the remote-control is also considered Class II.

What happens if I apply de novo classification for the remote-control to have it downgraded to Class I with it's own procode? Would this mean that I'm now essentially manufacturing 2 separate devices that should be treated independently?

...that said, I probably need to do a bit more reading... :read:

----

On another note, I imagine the FDA is setting themselves up to receive a flood of de novo requests from this document. ...I hope they've prepared for a backlog! :lol:
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#4
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

What happens if I apply de novo classification for the remote-control to have it downgraded to Class I with it's own procode? Would this mean that I'm now essentially manufacturing 2 separate devices that should be treated independently?
Yes.

:yes:
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

The definition of "accessory" requires that the accessory is specifically
intended by the manufacturer of the accessory to be used together with a
device. The intended use of the accessory must be such as to enable a device
to be used in accordance with its intended use. Therefore a product can only
become an accessory to a medical device if the manufacturer of such a
product establishes an intended use in conjunction with one or several
medical devices.

MEDDEV gives the above definition for medical device accessory.
THIS thread adds some more.
Also the Similar Discussion Threads under is valuable.
So an orthopedic tool does not become an accessory.
You may also have a case where the accessory class can be higher to that of the medical device ...
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#6
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

You may also have a case where the accessory class can be higher to that of the medical device ...
...so then what would be the reason a manufacturer of such an accessory to make a de novo application? ...it'd only just make their life more complicated.

As far as I can tell the FDA isn't mandating classifying accessories in this way. ...so the question is why would a manufacturer choose to?

Certainly in this case (and even, to a lesser extent, with downgrading the accessory class) it seems like a whole lot of headache...especially if the device and accessories are all being manufactured together under the same controls anyway...
 
M

MIREGMGR

#7
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

As far as I can tell the FDA isn't mandating classifying accessories in this way. ...so the question is why would a manufacturer choose to?
My employer markets several hundred products that are accessories to devices for which we are not regulatorily responsible. Our products meet the definition of accessory, and do not meet the definition of device. A significant hoop-jumping exercise is required by FDA to regulate them as devices in their own right.

Quite a few of these are low risk accessories for medium risk 510(k)ed products where our products were not included in the 510(k), either because the maker of the 510(k)ed product isn't making any money off our accessory so they didn't see a reason to include it, or our accessory didn't exist yet when the 510(k) was created.

So maybe the new guidance is our fault. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#8
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

...products that are accessories to devices for which we are not regulatorily responsible. Our products meet the definition of accessory, and do not meet the definition of device...
MIREGMGR: can you give example(s)?

My confusion stems from the following device definition:
"...instrument, apparatus, ...., or other similar or related article, including any component, part, or accessory"

and accessory definition: "A device that is intended to support, supplement, and/or augment the performance of one or more parent devices"

(underlines added)

So I'm confused as to how something can be a medical device accessory, but not a device...
 
M

MIREGMGR

#9
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

I appreciate the difficulty of dealing with FDA's legacy wording choices.

The full definition of "device", of course, is:

...an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is:
-recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them,
-intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or
-intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended purposes.​
Historically, FDA has considered medical products that are "intended to support, supplement, and/or augment the performance of one or more parent devices", but by themselves do not meet one of the three definitional conditions above except in a procedural proximity sense, to be accessories and therefore subject to most device regulation but not devices in their own regard.

Some Product Codes explicitly include relevant accessories. Others do not; whether relevant accessories are covered by them is a complicated question. Some Product Codes describe product types that arguably do not meet the device definition above, except in a broad sense; it appears to me that historically such Product Codes were intended to encompass the accessories to another device type.

As an example, there is a separate product code for a mounting trolley for an overhead suspended, track mounted surgical light. I don't know why in an historical sense, since surgical light mounting historically has been arranged by the light system manufacturer and has been specific to a particular light design, and surgical lights historically have required a 510(k). Therefore one would think that the mounting trolley would be included in the light system's 510(k). To the best of my knowledge, no 510(k)s have ever been issued under this mounting trolley Product Code.

I've discussed this Product Code with FDA, because (for a complex reason) we've considered marketing a mounting trolley for another device maker's surgical light system. My view, and I think FDA's as well, is that such a mounting trolley would be an accessory and subject to some device regulations, but not a device in its own regard.
 

Michael Malis

Quite Involved in Discussions
#10
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

MIREGMGR said:
I've discussed this Product Code with FDA, because (for a complex reason) we've considered marketing a mounting trolley for another device maker's surgical light system. My view, and I think FDA's as well, is that such a mounting trolley would be an accessory and subject to some device regulations, but not a device in its own regard.
I am not sure about this statement, because from the regulations point of view, you need to prove that your mounting trolley is working with another manufacturer device.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Watchcat Informational FDA Proposal to "Modernize" the 510(k) - 2019 Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
B What is the difference btw RUO vs IUO for IVD in FDA guidance ? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
B How to submit Pre-submission to FDA? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
L FDA & 21 CFR Part 11 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 19
B A.I diagnostic software is considered as medical device in FDA? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
Ed Panek 2020 FDA Top Ten Observations 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
M FDA Requirements for Investigational Devices - Clinical Investigation & Shipping Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Ed Panek Does this FDA Requirement Apply to international (not USA) distributors for USA based manufacturing companies? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
B FDA Breakthrough Device can be overlapped with a designated device? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
pbojsen ISO 13485 Requirements versus FDA product classification and GMP exemptions - Audits ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Examples of FDA acceptable Software Design Specification (SDS) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
F Labelling to comply with both FDA and MDR US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
Watchcat FDA vs NB Fees? Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
K FDA Registration and listing weird situation Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
D FDA Guidance on Computer Software Assurance versus 21 CFR Part 11 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
G Does FDA allows remote approvals of quality documentation. Is there any specific guidance on signing any quality records remotely? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
B Does FDA Registration QSR need to cover non-medical devices for contract repackager? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
C Non-sterile reusable surgical instruments - FDA sterilization requirement Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
D FDA Information - Revising the Instructions for Use US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
S Transitional Adolescent A and B - "CDRH PREMARKET REVIEW SUBMISSION COVER SHEET FORM FDA 3514" Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
B FDA requirement for CAPA Signoff ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
P MSDS for MVQ FDA White, Vinyl Methyl Silicone Rubber EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S Manufacturing Process FDA FOIA Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
S Manufacturing Process FDA FOIA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
S Mechanical Test Under FDA Freedom of Information Act Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
A Medical Device Contract Manufacturer - Does the CM need to register with FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
M Supplier requirements - Major supplier is a Non-Profit registered with ICCBBA (FDA UDI) Supply Chain Security Management Systems 12
C RA (Regulatory Assurance) Training (FDA) looking for resources Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 5
E FDA 513(g) Cover Letter US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
S Records - Do's and don't' of record entries (FDA - 21 CFR 820) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 13
B New Facility register with FDA Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 4
K 510k FDA review, will they accept Biocompatibility result generated using feasibility product lots? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
J FDA regulation on decorative contact lenses Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
P Anyone have an Idea on UAE Medical device registeration- Class B with FDA only Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
F FDA classification for a mobile app Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 3
Ed Panek IFU Contact Requirements - FDA and MDD/MDR US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
O Any info on release date of FDA “Computer Software Assurance for Manufacturing and Quality System Software” document? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
P Writing a presubmission to the FDA prior to the De novo submission US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
K FDA - Can we have more than 1 Initial Importer Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
K Two FDA questions regarding UDI (and potentially 803.52 MDR) Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
R Importers - For the FDA Registration/ Listing, is the CMO the importer? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
Z Iterative development and FDA change requests IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 13
P FDA Approved Product Contact Parts ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
O Clarifying FDA definition of "finished device" and “capable of functioning” 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
A FDA guidance on non-sterile Medical Device Packaging Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 7
JoCam FDA Registration for Sub-contract manufacturers Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M FDA News FDA Releases Draft Guidance Clarifying Application of ISO 10993-1 Biocompatibility Standard Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Is IEC 60601-1-2 required by FDA for all electronic medical devices? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
E Contract manufacturer FDA requirements foreign company US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
P Choice of FDA reviewer US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom