FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessory Risk Assessment

somashekar

Leader
Admin
FDA proposing to regulate medical device accessories based on the risks they present when used as intended with their parent devices and not based on the risks of their parent devices. For example, if a parent device warrants regulation as a Class II device but an accessory to the parent device presents lower risks, FDA would regulate the accessory as a Class I rather than a Class II device.
This could be helpful and useful to a lot of manufacturer's..
Read more HERE
 

Chrisx

Involved In Discussions
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

At least for me the guidance is not helpful at all. We manufacture spinal implants, with a complete line of surgical instruments designed to be used with the implant. For example, this might be a screwdriver. According to this guidance, the screwdriver might be a class I device product code HXX. Alternatively, the FDA might decide on the basis of risk that it is to be regulated as an accessory to the implant. Product code HXX is exempt from design controls, but spinal implants are not. I can never be sure if the instruments are subject to design controls. FDAs suggestion is that I submit a de novo for every instrument we manufacture to determine the device classification. This is a practical way to determine device classification for a simple surgical instrument!:mad:

Furthermore, the guidance doesn't really describe how a class II device accessory is to be regulated. Does the screwdriver need its own 510(k)? Does it require predicate? What if I change the material of the screwdriver, does this require a special 510(K)? Where would I find the predicate for the screwdriver, since code HXX is exempt from premarket notification.

Of course, I have picked an extreme example by selecting the screwdriver. However there are many instruments. Product codes have no definition with them to help understand what device applies. For example, there is a product code HXE for "fork". A rod fork is a fork shaped device used with pedicle screws for distraction. Does a rod fork belong to code HXE? It becomes very hard to know whether a device will be considered an orthopedic manual surgical instrument according to 21CFR888.4540 or an accessory. One can never know for sure when design controls or premarket notification is required. Too bad FDA can't agree to classify accessories on their own, like most other countries.
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

I agree that what's missing is more guidance as to what are the implications of accessories.

For example, I have a system that consists of a Class II device (parent), and a remote-control ("accessory"), which have gone through 510k.
So, under the system 510k, the remote-control is also considered Class II.

What happens if I apply de novo classification for the remote-control to have it downgraded to Class I with it's own procode? Would this mean that I'm now essentially manufacturing 2 separate devices that should be treated independently?

...that said, I probably need to do a bit more reading... :read:

----

On another note, I imagine the FDA is setting themselves up to receive a flood of de novo requests from this document. ...I hope they've prepared for a backlog! :lol:
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

What happens if I apply de novo classification for the remote-control to have it downgraded to Class I with it's own procode? Would this mean that I'm now essentially manufacturing 2 separate devices that should be treated independently?

Yes.

:yes:
 

somashekar

Leader
Admin
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

The definition of "accessory" requires that the accessory is specifically
intended by the manufacturer of the accessory to be used together with a
device. The intended use of the accessory must be such as to enable a device
to be used in accordance with its intended use. Therefore a product can only
become an accessory to a medical device if the manufacturer of such a
product establishes an intended use in conjunction with one or several
medical devices.

MEDDEV gives the above definition for medical device accessory.
THIS thread adds some more.
Also the Similar Discussion Threads under is valuable.
So an orthopedic tool does not become an accessory.
You may also have a case where the accessory class can be higher to that of the medical device ...
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

You may also have a case where the accessory class can be higher to that of the medical device ...

...so then what would be the reason a manufacturer of such an accessory to make a de novo application? ...it'd only just make their life more complicated.

As far as I can tell the FDA isn't mandating classifying accessories in this way. ...so the question is why would a manufacturer choose to?

Certainly in this case (and even, to a lesser extent, with downgrading the accessory class) it seems like a whole lot of headache...especially if the device and accessories are all being manufactured together under the same controls anyway...
 
M

MIREGMGR

Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

As far as I can tell the FDA isn't mandating classifying accessories in this way. ...so the question is why would a manufacturer choose to?

My employer markets several hundred products that are accessories to devices for which we are not regulatorily responsible. Our products meet the definition of accessory, and do not meet the definition of device. A significant hoop-jumping exercise is required by FDA to regulate them as devices in their own right.

Quite a few of these are low risk accessories for medium risk 510(k)ed products where our products were not included in the 510(k), either because the maker of the 510(k)ed product isn't making any money off our accessory so they didn't see a reason to include it, or our accessory didn't exist yet when the 510(k) was created.

So maybe the new guidance is our fault. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

...products that are accessories to devices for which we are not regulatorily responsible. Our products meet the definition of accessory, and do not meet the definition of device...

MIREGMGR: can you give example(s)?

My confusion stems from the following device definition:
"...instrument, apparatus, ...., or other similar or related article, including any component, part, or accessory"

and accessory definition: "A device that is intended to support, supplement, and/or augment the performance of one or more parent devices"

(underlines added)

So I'm confused as to how something can be a medical device accessory, but not a device...
 
M

MIREGMGR

Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

I appreciate the difficulty of dealing with FDA's legacy wording choices.

The full definition of "device", of course, is:

...an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is:
-recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them,
-intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or
-intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended purposes.​

Historically, FDA has considered medical products that are "intended to support, supplement, and/or augment the performance of one or more parent devices", but by themselves do not meet one of the three definitional conditions above except in a procedural proximity sense, to be accessories and therefore subject to most device regulation but not devices in their own regard.

Some Product Codes explicitly include relevant accessories. Others do not; whether relevant accessories are covered by them is a complicated question. Some Product Codes describe product types that arguably do not meet the device definition above, except in a broad sense; it appears to me that historically such Product Codes were intended to encompass the accessories to another device type.

As an example, there is a separate product code for a mounting trolley for an overhead suspended, track mounted surgical light. I don't know why in an historical sense, since surgical light mounting historically has been arranged by the light system manufacturer and has been specific to a particular light design, and surgical lights historically have required a 510(k). Therefore one would think that the mounting trolley would be included in the light system's 510(k). To the best of my knowledge, no 510(k)s have ever been issued under this mounting trolley Product Code.

I've discussed this Product Code with FDA, because (for a complex reason) we've considered marketing a mounting trolley for another device maker's surgical light system. My view, and I think FDA's as well, is that such a mounting trolley would be an accessory and subject to some device regulations, but not a device in its own regard.
 

Michael Malis

Quite Involved in Discussions
Re: FDA proposal on Medical Device Accessories

MIREGMGR said:
I've discussed this Product Code with FDA, because (for a complex reason) we've considered marketing a mounting trolley for another device maker's surgical light system. My view, and I think FDA's as well, is that such a mounting trolley would be an accessory and subject to some device regulations, but not a device in its own regard.

I am not sure about this statement, because from the regulations point of view, you need to prove that your mounting trolley is working with another manufacturer device.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Watchcat Informational FDA Proposal to "Modernize" the 510(k) - 2019 Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
Ed Panek Looking for help... FDA Pre Sub, IVD, Investigational level experience US Medical Device Regulations 0
U How should we build the FDA inspection preparedness team for FDA inspections at factories? General Auditing Discussions 0
D FDA combo product-need to define direct & indirect impact regarding safety,quality & regulatory.Can anyone point me in right direction-SupplierMgmt 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
B What is meant by "post production" if the device is yet to receive FDA approval? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
B FDA Requirements for medical device to be used for training purposes only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 9
M Class III IVD PMA Amendment to FDA Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
L Verification of wireless QoS and coexistence during FDA certification of medical devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
W Notify FDA of Change of Ownership? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
G FDA requirements for risk analysis US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
V Anyone have templates for FDA GMP Guidelines for supplement manufacturers? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
N FDA mechanical bench testing Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
V Regulatory consultants for US FDA ANDA - pharma / drug products Consultants and Consulting 0
M Clinical evaluation process of FDA and MDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
S Is it possible to obtain FDA clearance (510k) without meeting QSR? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
P Biocompatibility testing ISO-10993 for FDA submission Other Medical Device Related Standards 7
Ed Panek FDA Submission Question US Medical Device Regulations 3
Y The day after the FDA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
U FDA foreign inspection and COVID19 US Medical Device Regulations 4
Y Convenience pack FDA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
B FDA regulations medical device prescription fulfillment DME question US Medical Device Regulations 0
N FDA medical devices US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
R US FDA 510k Australia TGA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
B How FDA define a new variant/generation or a new device US Medical Device Regulations 11
G FDA Annual Registration and Listing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
T Book Excerpt: Drugs and the FDA: Safety, Efficacy, and the Public’s Trust Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 0
E The FDA regulations (21 CFR 312.3): Is it allowable that IND sponsor involves more than one individual or organization? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
P Looking for Korean FDA Drug Master File requirements for packaging systems. Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
M IEC 62366 Hazard-related Use Scenario vs FDA Critical Task EU Medical Device Regulations 3
N Free sale and FDA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
N FDA class 1 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
G UDI in EU vs FDA EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Initial Audit FDA US Medical Device Regulations 3
T FDA PMA review process - advisory panel timing? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 0
E FDA & Internal Audits US Medical Device Regulations 3
N Importing into US without 510K/FDA Clearance US Medical Device Regulations 1
N FDA class 2 Device QS Requirements US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
T FDA labeling requirements US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
S FDA Contract Manufacturer and Applicant US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
R IVD Software FDA/CLIA doubts Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
R IVD software FDA and CLIA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
T FDA level of concern vs IEC 62304 safety classification - 510(k) exempt device Other US Medical Device Regulations 13
K Change in address on ERLM US FDA: Implications to import US Medical Device Regulations 0
V FDA 510K - Pre Submission Query US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
M Document Control ISO and FDA ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
C FDA 510k documentation requirements US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
T Link GMDN code and FDA product code US Medical Device Regulations 5
cgaro62 Does FDA apply to a non-medical 13485 certified custom manufacturing company? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
M How does FDA determine OAI and VAI after inspection? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
K Non-Device MDDS Clarifications (FDA) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7

Similar threads

Top Bottom