FDIS 9001:2000 "Trends"

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#1
From: ISO Standards Discussion
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:49:52 -0500
Subject: Re: FDIS 9001:2000 "Trends" /Green/Paten

From: Mike Paten

> From: Joseph Green "To anyone lurking out there that
> knows FDIS content;
>
> Having observed the CD1, CD2, DIS revisions (with a great deal of joy)
> I'm curious if the word "Trends" remains as content in the FDIS
> version? What do others see as it's significance to "processes" and
> "products"? Where minimalist organizations have shown no "visible",
> "measurable" improvement; how will you "RAB" auditors respond to
> corporate smoke vs. valid corporate numbers?
>
> Love to hear comments prior to Oct. 2, when I'm charged with speaking
> on "my opinion" to the 9K2K revisions."

According to the DIS and/or FDIS - measurement requires (or infers) data collection of anything that represents desirable or undesirable product or process outcomes - while analysis requires (or infers) that these measurements must be viewed over time to assign cause and determine the need for corrective action and/or improvement. The word "trend" refers to any data viewed over time.

"Smoke" is "selective" measurements that show the "desired trend" - usually requiring no action (or action the company was going to take anyway). "Real trend" data represents the process "cycle" over a period that is likely to capture most outcomes (desired or otherwise) and will almost always result in some action - because continuous improvement never ends. Hence, the need to prioritize improvements on the basis of greatest need and/or opportunity.

Auditors (RAB or otherwise) will only be able to distinguish "smoke" from "real trend" data based on their experience with the processes they are auditing - which for the most part will not change with issuance of the forthcoming revisions to the ISO 9000 standards.

Although I would guess that even inexperienced auditors will be able to detect the "smell of smoke" - and ask probing questions accordingly.

Mike Paten
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#2
From: ISO Standards Discussion
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 09:49:23 -0500
Subject: Re: FDIS 9001:2000 "Trends" /Green/Kozenko

From: David M. Kozenko

From: Joseph Green
> Having observed the CD1, CD2, DIS revisions (with a great deal of joy)
> I'm curious if the word "Trends" remains as content in the FDIS version?
>
> What do others see as it's significance to "processes" and "products"?
>
> Where minimalist organizations have shown no "visible", "measurable"
> improvement; how will you "RAB" auditors respond to corporate smoke vs.
> valid corporate numbers?

I see no difference between ISO9001:1994 (the "old" Standard) and ISO/DIS9001:2000 (I-2k) when it comes to the word "trends."

By the length of this post (for which I apologize to those who get all knotted up if it's more than one paragraph), one can probably tell that Joe has hit a nerve...

I was in an outfit implementing ISO9001:1994 and I encountered terminal Neanderthal syndrome, but (interestingly) it was only attached to certain portions of the old Standard.

Illustration: 4.20 Statistical Techniques was buried "closed coffin" before more than 3 people even read it, because this outfit did professional services and "didn't use statistical techniques." (On my Father's grave I swear, those were the exact words I heard, over and over...).

Time and again in the ISO9000:1994 Standard, individual "elements" are specified in such a way that they (in non-Neanderthal terms) fold back upon the entire quality system: (1) Internal Audit must look at the QMS, but then also must examine itself (an audit of Internal Audit); (2) same for Corrective and Preventive Action; and (3) ditto for Training, and so on.

As if terms like billable base, federal overhead rate, attrition and # of active contracts were all brand new terms, this outfit (and thousands like it, I was later to discover) went charging into QMS implementation looking a little bit ( to me ;o) like those bobbing-head dolls you sometimes see in the back window of the car in front of you... operating a services business and implementing a QMS, all the while saying "... we don't use statistical techniques."

So I stand on my feet and APPLAUD the writers of I-2k for several things, the most enjoyable of which (this is my "author" speaking, now) is Clause 8.4 Analysis of data for improvement. Clause I-2k 8.4 is, effectively, old clause 4.20 Statistical techniques, glued to a stone mallet and delivered wide-swing to the forehead of Neanderthals such that they should be extinct, or at least embarrassed.

Because the word "trends" in I-2k is nothing new.

(A.) Under ISO9001:1994 4.14, look at any entity's current list of corrective actions -- try not to group them by ISO-clause or Procedure-clause, because if you did you'd be starting to determine "... the magnitude of problems" (which is detectable as a trend) so that corrective action can be commensurate with the risks.

(B.) Under ISO9001:1994 4.18, "Appropriate records of training shall be maintained." One time I asked the question, "Shouldn't we test after training to see if folks GOT IT?" and the answer I got sounded something like this: "People come to headquarters to eat, and to drink, and not to fail tests." Proof that the word "appropriate" means different things, depending on what rung of the evolutionary ladder you're on. (In fact, another interesting trend I observed was how, each time that it turned out I was correct about this or that disputed interpretation regarding ISO9001:1994, it would suddenly be paraphrased by another senior manager and become a brilliant idea. More bobbing heads.)

(C.) Under ISO9001:1994, there are eighteen "(see 4.16)" quality record requirements. These are all supposed to provide a means for satisfying the 1 SCOPE subparagraph b) requirement that "confidence in product conformance can be attained by adequate demonstration of ... capabilities..." but in order to do that you need to analyze the data and establish trends.

(D.) There are many more "trend" locations in the old Standard, but I think I've made my point !!!

The Editor of McGraw Hill's "Quality Systems Update," J. Paul Scicchitano, summarized the results of a 1999 survey of ISO9k players by stating, "Companies that attempt to exceed the basic requirements of ISO9000 tend to have a more favorable return on investment than those companies that do not."

If your entity elected to exceed the "strict" requirements of ISO9001:1994 and, in fact, did begin to establish and implement statistical data under "old" clause 4.20 and to take a serious look at meaningful trends, then (1) your entity is probably much better off for it; and, (2) your entity has very little adjusting to do for I-2k "trends" because you've already been doing it.

Even to a newbie-RAB auditor, "corporate smoke" will look a lot like bobbing heads and "hey, we're new at this statistics stuff." On the other hand, a mature QMS will quickly rise to the surface based on its many years of trend analysis justification.

But the WAY that I-2k, Section 8 is worded, it sure makes it easy for a Registrar's Auditor (RAB or otherwise) to write a nonconformity report (audit finding, observation, or whatever term you want) where non-effectiveness is detected simply because OBVIOUS data is ignored.

Separates the wheat from the chaff, and quickly amends the bobbing-head's approach to "old" 4.20. Now THAT's continuous improvement!

David M. Kozenko
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Approval of FDIS ISO 9001:2000 - They've ordered a re-count - Too close to call ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
P FDIS ISO 9001:2000 vs. ISO 9001:1994 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M FDIS ISO 9001:2000 changes to 8.2.1 Customer Satisfaction ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
D Changes in FDIS 9001:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
R ISO 45001 (FDIS) Webinar - Jan 24 2018 at 11:00 am ET Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 1
G FDIS 14001 - Implementation - Gear our EMS towards 14001:2004? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 10
S FDIS 14001 & 14004 has been issued by the ISO/CS on August 12, 2004 for a vote ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
K FDIS of ISO 14001 - Released April 2004? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 20
Sidney Vianna ISO/FDIS 10002 Quality Management - Customer Satisfaction - Guidelines for Complaints Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 7
R ISO/FDIS 19011 (Espa?ol) General Auditing Discussions 0
G Auditing Top management: 6.3 ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
G IT being audited during ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Moncia Customer satisfaction monitoring - ISO 9001 and 14001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
Sidney Vianna ISO 9001 News ISO 9001 Design Specification to be developed - May 2022 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
S ISO 9001:2015 Project Plan ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
G Common items : which iso 9001 are common to all areas? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
G ISO 9001 - when implementing customer requirement ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
V ISO 9001 or ISO 17065 required for an organization issuing 5 star rating certification of digital experience? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
P How to keep a ISO 9001:2015 certification when a company is sold ? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
D ISO 9001:2015 Recertification Audit Timing ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
J ISO 9001:2015 Is a Project Evaluation form necessary? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
malasuerte Performance of ISO 9001 certified vs. non-certified manufacturing companies ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
D Filling totes and pails - when is a calibrated scale / flowmeter required in ISO 9001 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
Moncia ISO 9001 calibration question please ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
T Accreditations as part of 9001 - Quality checks on your company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
J ISO 9001 Clause advice Needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
Sidney Vianna ISO 9001 News ISO/TC 176/SC 2 Listing of Approved Interpretations against ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q Management Review ISO 9001-2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 36
J Process capability analysis in ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
B Use an iso 9001/2015 form for api q1 systeme Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 5
Q Which Kapt standard assignment ISO 9001:2015? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
Q Quality Awareness 7.3 ISO 9001-2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Cats Clause ISO 9001:2015 7.1.5 Monitoring and measuring resources: Application to training providers ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
M Quality Management-ISO 9001:2015 General Auditing Discussions 1
J 9001 Internal Audit of Client Onboarding process ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
E Sources of every single paragraph of the ISO 9001 standards? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
G ISO 9001-2015 How to co-relate Clause 4.2 & Clause 6.1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 22
B ISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 13485:2016 Gap analysis ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
I Does BSI require suppliers to be ISO 9001 Certified? EU Medical Device Regulations 12
Ron Rompen ISO 9001 Sanctioned Interpretations and FAQs ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
K Need Help With Auditing Suppliers Against ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 50
G Compliance with ISO 9001-2015 for ISO 17025 Accredited Labs? ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
L Change Log in (controlled) Forms? (ISO 9001:2015) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
K ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 & 8.6 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
S Transition training for Internal Auditor from ISO 9001: 2008 to the ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
H R&D Lab ISO 9001 certification ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
J ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.5.1 Control of Production and service provision - Help with Work Instruction Access ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
T How to conduct combined internal audits (9001 and 13485) Internal Auditing 1
M Does the scope of ISO 9001:2015 applies to tenders, pricing and sales department of a medical devices distributor? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
D Can an ISO 9001 Certificate have Remote Locations? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom