Feasibility review prior to quoting - Requirements Review - 7.2.2 Feasibility Help


tim banic

Hello All

I have a question...we are deep in debate (sometimes very loudly) over the need for feasibility review prior to quoting.

I am saying that we need to look at all quotes to determine if we have the capability and will not run into problems.

Sales Manager is saying we should quote, then do the feasibility closer to landing the job.

My response "Once we have quoted we have committed & it is too late to change things after the customer has decided that our quote was the one. All we will do is **** off the customer by changing everything down the road closer to landing the job, or when the P/O arrives. Ultimately messing up future business, with them & the rest of the other potential customers...because you know sure as God made little green apples at the next trade show they will say " Boy this company said they could do it & when I gave them the P/O they changed everything".

He came back to me and said 90% of the quotes do not have a defined date for the project to land, so we are looking at "Pie in The Sky information anyways".

I tell him at least everyone has looked at it & said yes my dept. can handle this job when it arrives.

Then the discussion starts all over again...kinda like two dogs chasing their tails. This can go on for hours at intense levels of discussion (not fighting but discussion).

We are looking at a mini Feasibility review, handled by the major departments (production, Engineering, SCheduling, Shipping) as a solution.

Any help, discussion, samples of your own adventures & solutions would help me.

thank you folks, if you would like to email me [email protected].

Tim Banic
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor



Since all quotes don't produce orders, I can understand your Sales Manager not wanting to add cost to the process unnecessarily. It sounds like you've already worked out a solution with the mini-feasiblity review following up with a more in-depth review closer to landing the order. It might be wise to take a supportive position in this situation. :)

Best Regards,
Hank Fowler

Al Dyer

Let's talk the real world,

How many quotes do you produce daily, weekly, or monthly?

How long does it take to do a feasibility study? Maybe 1/2 hour?

I've never seen a company that quotes new product daily. If they are that large they can afford to do feasibility.

In my humble opinion feasibility has to be part of quoting and contract review.

Go to a Production Manager and tell him/her that there is a new product that starts next week and will need a new machine and personnel.


Super Moderator
Super Moderator
I also think you need to do some sort of feasibility. It may not be real sophisticated, but if you (sales) sells it and production can't make it, somebody is going to be really hot. And the first one you'll PO is the customer...that's not the guy you want mad in today's economy. And, you know as well as I do that if sales promises somebody something and it can't be done, you will end up getting blamed for it somehow. The motto of a "Quality Person" whatever your title may be is: I am a responsible person. Every time something goes wrong, I'm responsible.;)


Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
I think Al started what I would say. Look at your business. Let's say you make machines that staple boxes. A sales person starts a sale. That sales person should already have some idea what plant capacity is, pending orders and be ready - in his/her own head to know whether the terms and conditions within the request for quote are doable. If not, there is a serious communications problem. That said, the first actual review is one which will be mental. As an extreme example, if an RFQ came in for 1,000 machines in 2 months the sales person should have some idea whether they're capable of that. The company may only currently make 500 machines a year. (let me see here.... 1000 in 2 months and we never made mor than 500 in a whiole year before. I wonder if we could just....) So - some of it is gonna be basic.

Some companies have a form a sales person completes and returns to 'the home office' for a review by a manager (or other appointed person) to 'take a looksie' at the preliminary info prior to replying to the customer. This is more ormal - many smaller companies may not need such a review.

Feasibility studies have been pushed because many compnies (particularly in the high volume manufacturing industries) have had a tendancy to bid based on hopes and prayers (poor internal communication or management stupidity and greed {we'll think about whether we can do it after we get the contract}).

This is an oldie but goodie from my early 'training in quality' days. Those of you old enough to remember when the first little portable AM radios that you could put in your shirt pocket and ran on 9V cells came out (what - the late 1950s?), may remember they were a hit. And they were cheap - what - 10 to 20 bucks or something? As I remember, Zenith introduced them in the US. But - Sony Japan was making them for Zenith. The demand was so great that Zenith came back to Sony and said we want 5X of the quantity we purchased last year. Sony came back with a bid which was almost twice what they charged previously. Zenith accused Sony of trying to screw them. Sony justified their costs to Zenith and Zenith went with it. Why?

Sony did a feasibility study. Sony found that to produce the volume Zenith wanted Sony would have to build a new plant, etc., etc. So - the cost factor was based upon what contract Zenith would agree to - part of which became length and a guaranteed minimum buy over X years.

The more complex the item, and the higher the mix of products and processes, the more important feasibility studies become. This is not to mention - especially in 'high tech' - does the technology exist to even make what this design calls out for?

The bottom line is look at your company and ask yourself where feasibility really becomes critical. Does your sales force REALLY know enough to be able to discuss an RFQ? Is your company a BIG company where - for example - one machine is used on several products and scheduling is an issue? Does anyone now have access to information (this is more high volume) which lays out % of current and planned utilization of each of the necessary machines?

What if you're a 10 person machine shop and get an RFQ? In these cases feasibility is usually done by one person in their head - the owner. In such small a shop, the owner typically knows what s/he can and can't do and has some idea of current and predicted machine utilization.

I was in one extreme case where, while at Cincinnati Electronics, we were bidding on a contract. We didn't call it a feasibility review, but every department got a copy of the RFQ and had to submit a formal report, by a certain date, with all the shit - manpower projections, new equiment projections, current equipment utilization with respect to other planned (or potential) projects - you name it. My part was to give projections of costs for certain environmental testing stated in the requirement including writing the environmental design criteria test plan (EDCTP for those in the govt) with considration to the mission profile. We also wrote the Product Quality Assurance Program Plan - the QAPP - (which some may mentally link here to the discussion in the thread on Quality Manuals and rquirements for 'Quality Plans) which was program (read produt) specific. When I talk 'environmental' testing here, I'm talking vibration, shock, altitude, explosive atmosphere, Mil-S-901 Shock, thermal cycling, etc., etc. Will it survive it's 'mission', not whether the product would pollute something (like the earth). As far as it went for the company as a whole, the project of even doing this was a project costing in the millions. But it had to be done for submission to the government as evidence that we had considered every potential factor and could fulfill the contract and that we knoew what it would cost (please - no discussions here on how everyone lowballed whenever possible...). Of course, there were several companies involved in the competition. CE lost that contract, but I can't remember who to. Now THAT was a feasibility study and then some... And cost several million bucks.

As a last comment and aspect. Let's say you make rubber bands (rubber or whatever compound) and someone comes to you and submits an RFQ for thumb tacks (metal) which you currently do not make (you only make rubber bands). What will you do? At what point will you do a 'feasibility study'? Will it be mental or documented?

Use common sense when defining one or more formal 'feasibility' study points. Most are done in peoples heads first. And from then on - in larger companies, every design reiew has (should have) a feasibility review.

For me - nothing really officially starts until the formal RFQ arrives.

tim banic


Thank you all for your comments & ideas...I will be thinking deeply on this topic.

thans again for all your help.

Efficient Feasibility Reviews

The intent of ISO9001 and QS9000 is clearly that feasibility reviews must be conducted prior to formal quote. But if you have a lot of customers fishing for prices and preliminary look sees then I have some ideas to make the process more efficient. One is to issue a preliminary ballpark quotes that are subject to full feasibilty review or successful mill trials. The second idea is too sit down with a cross functional team and document a capability study that clearly defines a window of specifications and volumes that are pre-approved with maybe a check on current volume capacity required. This gives the Sales personnel freedom to quote "standard items" immediately and efficiently. Any request for quote that falls outside of this window requires a full cross functional team feasibility review and timely sign-off. We have used such a system that uses three feasibilty streams :i) standard quickie, ii) team feasibilty for non-standard and finally iii) full APQP feasibilty review for major new automotive quotes or high risk ventures. This worked fine with the auditors and it leaves the Sales staff able to quote 90%+ of the requests within 1/2 hour. Kind of like a pre-approved mortgage.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R The difference between Feasibility Assessment and Contract Review Contract Review Process 2
V Contract Review Process and Feasibility Analysis and Review Contract Review Process 2
M Design Review/Dimensional Analysis feasibility program or spreadsheet? Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
N "Concept Feasibility Review" checklist for new products - Seeking template or example APQP and PPAP 5
M Contract Review Process - Risk Analysis - Manufacturing feasibility Contract Review Process 4
T Feasibility Review - How are you meeting 7.2.2 and requirements? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
L TS 16949 - Feasibility Review, including Risk Anaylsis vs. FMEA General Auditing Discussions 4
S When to perform a Feasibility Review QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
K APQP Phase 3 - Team Feasibility Commitment APQP and PPAP 3
S ITA (Investigational Testing Authorization) for Clinical Feasibility Study Canada Medical Device Regulations 4
R Determining the feasibility/scope for FDA IQ/OQ against a very simple application US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
J Meeting Feasibility Requirement - High number of part quotes IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
D Risk Requirement for TS16949 Feasibility IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S Final FDA Guidance on IDEs for Early Feasibility Clinical Studies - 2013 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
Q What documentation is required for Design Feasibility trial? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
J Metal Stampers Feasibility form that includes Risk Factors IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
B Feasibility Analysis Study Format Template Example Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
D IDE Regulations for Feasibility IDE Study US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
V Feasibility Index and Prioritization Index - Concepts and Terms FMEA and Control Plans 2
Q Feasibility of PPAP for Part Qualification in Medical Devices APQP and PPAP 2
T Quote Feasibility Reviews - ISO 9001 Clause 7.2.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
V Should Feasibility be done in the APQP phase - TS 16949 Clause IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
I Feasibility Study rather than an FMEA on a Risk Issue - Clause 7.2.2 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
S Feasibility of having one Quality Manual that documents 2 businesses? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
V Team feasibility commitment : meaning of efficient material handling techniques ? APQP and PPAP 1
J APQP and Quoting - When does APQP start? Are Feasibility Studies Required? APQP and PPAP 2
B Section Organization Manufacturing Feasibility - Risk Analysis example? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
G When do you need to fill Team Feasibility Commitment? APQP and PPAP 14
Crusader Team Feasibility - ISO 9001:2000 does not require it? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
K How do you conduct feasibility studies and document it? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
L Feasibility Evaluation - Product Adequately Defined? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
T - Organizational Manufacturing Feasibility IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S Manufacturing Feasibility including risk assessment IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Q Looking for example EC process flow that addresses feasibility - Metal Stamping ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
A Traduccion del "Team Feasibility Commitment" a espa?ol?nish? APQP and PPAP 5
N PFMEAs and Inspection Process - Feasibility Analysis FMEA and Control Plans 5
I Need Help with Process FMEA Basics - Feasibility Analysis Outputs are Inputs to FMEA? FMEA and Control Plans 25
A Feasibility Reviews clause in QS9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 3
Q PPT used as Design Review ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
bryan willemot Contract Review and risk managment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
J Can signed agreements over-ride review of every "contract" under ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S ISO 9001 Clause 8.2.3 - Review of the requirements for products and services in a Cafe ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A 510(k) review timeline 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
eule del ayre Documented Information - Periodic Review of Documents? IATF 16949:2016 / ISO 9001:2015 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 34
S Management Review (9.3) - Management Review Minutes/Report ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
J ISO 13485 System 'soft start' - How to best reflect this in initial audits, management review minutes and other records? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Forms review Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
V Quality review Meeting with Customer for complaints we received Customer Complaints 6
C Contract Review with Multiple Line items ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
O ISO 13485 - Is management review required before stage 1? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom