Final inspection process design for a machine shop setting.

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Staff member
Admin
#11
:agree1: That's a good follow up comment Bob, I do not think I could have said it so well.

In our case the recurring problem was a complete lack of environmental control. I left that company some time ago - they might have air conditioned the space by now, as I proposed.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

bobdoering

Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
#12
In our case the recurring problem was a complete lack of environmental control. I left that company some time ago - they might have air conditioned the space by now, as I proposed.
That is very bad when machining aluminum! :frust: Also have to track machine warmup more carefully for some materials and machines than the ongoing checks after warmup. It is a special cause!
 

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Staff member
Admin
#13
That is very bad when machining aluminum! :frust: Also have to track machine warmup more carefully for some materials and machines than the ongoing checks after warmup. It is a special cause!
We were machining steel for the most part; so the issue from temperature/humidity variation was usually size, but chatter on sealing surfaces did crop up too, and was being frequently inspected for.

Be warned Sativ, all of these types of issues need to be considered when designing an inspection plan.
 

bobdoering

Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
#14
In a precision machining environment, it is not a good practice for in-process inspection to be informal, rather, it should be part of a well-thought out Control Plan for each different product, taking into consideration such things as critical characteristic dictated by the customer and machining "checkpoints" before a final dimension.
[/FONT]
True. :agree1: The best control is to at least SPC the tightest tolerance for each finishing tool. SPC some of those 'machining checkpoint' interim dimensions (e.g. roughing for a tight finishing operation or blanking for threads) can also be very beneficial in minimizing adjustments downstream. The criticality of the dimension really has little to do with the control - although they tend to be the tightest tolerance characteristics.

Control Charts
In my high tech machining business (1990 -2000),...
Good ideas for the time! The only exception now would be to go back to paper charts and use X hi/lo-R charts. Not likely available on the software SPC systems. Also, no need to calculate cpk. Capability in a properly controlled precision machining process is a constant.
 

bobdoering

Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
#15
We were machining steel for the most part; so the issue from temperature/humidity variation was usually size, but chatter on sealing surfaces did crop up too, and was being frequently inspected for.
Good point - surface finish can trump a lot of dimensional controls.
 
S

sativ

#16
I am curious how do you define "final inspection"? I believe that will drive the extent of inspection needed.

Do you have a First Article Process to qualify the process?

Do you have First Piece Inspection program in place?

Do you have a in process inspection program in place?

>> Can I have a First Article Inspection only if required by customer? can i state it in my manufacturing procedure?

>> For the In-process inspection, currently is done depending on the operator's discretion.

Thanks for spending some time on this guys, i really appreciate it!

Btw, my previous job was a process engineer (look for ways to improve a product), and not focused on quality assurance inspection design...
 

CarolX

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#17
>> Can I have a First Article Inspection only if required by customer? can i state it in my manufacturing procedure?
How do you qualify new parts if you don't do a first article inspection?

For the In-process inspection, currently is done depending on the operator's discretion.
How qualified are those operators to make that judgement? I would try to standardize the inprocess inspection. You may want to start by interviewing the operators to see what they use for their "discretion". Then find a way to apply that to all processes.
 

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Staff member
Admin
#18
I agree with Carol, but I want to add that my insights are drawn from my experience in a job shop. That means:

1) Jobs and their specifications will vary, so their inspection needs will too.
2) Equipment was not the same - machines had unique quirks that also affected inspection design.
3) The uncontrolled heat and humidity added further uncertainty to the CNC process.

None of our inspections were set up exactly the same among all the types of parts we ran. Furthermore, even the same type of part might have different inspection needs if, as I said earlier, variation is being introduced via man, material, machine and/or environment.

The machinists were familiar enough with their produts and machines that they knew they needed to inspect at given intervals; they could sometimes stretch out the intervals, and sometimes had to shorten the intervals. Be very cautious, at least at first, to understand how well your machinists understand and apply these principles.

All of that is moot if the processes are in control and all the machinist does is put the part in, push a button and remove the part.

There - have I made that complicated and confusing enough? :bonk:
 
S

sativ

#19
Thank you for sharing me some opinions.
>> What I mean regarding the FA inspection is the documentation (to be submitted to the customer) necessary, even if they dont ask?
>> My procedure in standardizing the INPROCESS inspection, will be the following:
i. inspection for the first part produced by a specific machine/tool replacement
ii. inspection for the last part produced by a specific machine or before tool
replacement
iii. inspection every "X" times(still to determine "X" depending on machine and
quantity to be produced)
iv. inspection on the previous part of which non-conformity was detected.

with all these, is it necessary to introduce another FORM for operator to jot down the reading results, or a simple checkbox will do in the router (to make things more simplier) to confirm that they have done ALL the inspection themselves (including the disposition for non-conforming parts)? ---- NOTE: THIS IS FOR INPROCESS INSPECTION ONLY

Thanks.
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#20
Thank you for sharing me some opinions.
>> What I mean regarding the FA inspection is the documentation (to be submitted to the customer) necessary, even if they dont ask?
Yep. If the customer wants it, just give him a photocopy (or, as I used to do, give each customer access to our network (password protected) to view the data in real time - saves forests in avoiding multiple bales of paper.) The point is you really want to ensure supplier and customer agree on product so supplier doesn't create a pile of scrap the customer will not accept.
>> My procedure in standardizing the INPROCESS inspection, will be the following:
i. inspection for the first part produced by a specific machine/tool replacement
ii. inspection for the last part produced by a specific machine or before tool
replacement
iii. inspection every "X" times(still to determine "X" depending on machine and
quantity to be produced)
iv. inspection on the previous part of which non-conformity was detected.

with all these, is it necessary to introduce another FORM for operator to jot down the reading results, or a simple checkbox will do in the router (to make things more simplier) to confirm that they have done ALL the inspection themselves (including the disposition for non-conforming parts)? ---- NOTE: THIS IS FOR INPROCESS INSPECTION ONLY

Thanks.
You are ignoring the concept of in process inspection which requires taking a number of consecutive samples to detect any trends in variation. All this is predicated, of course, upon having large numbers of product in production versus small lots. Checkboxes are for attributes - if you want to check variation, you need metrics - actual dimensions, not just pass/fail.

Do you have operator empowerment to stop the process if actual nonconformance is detected (to implement corrective/preventive action)?
FWIW:
In our high tech contract machining business (all custom work for other manufacturers), each part had a Control Plan.

In addition to all the other stuff in a Control Plan (agreed to in advance by each customer), we included an Inspection Process specific to the individual part. At first we did hand measurement and recording - later, automated measuring and direct input of readings to a computer.
Among other things, the Inspection Process included:

  1. an engineering drawing of the part with each dimension to be inspected tagged with a number (in the order in which the dimension was to be inspected.)
  2. A part-specific inspection check list with each dimension numbered in the order it was to be inspected, listing the target dimension with tolerance (column 1), together with the type of instrument (column 2), and the actual dimension measured (column 3), and a 4th column for a redundant check of the same sample by another inspector.
  3. The measured sample was tagged and traveled with the rest of the documentation in the order traveler (the document package which traveled with each step in processing to final shipment.)
We specifically designed each part-specific inspection process for the most efficient use of instruments and operator time. The numbering directed a consistent measuring process on each sample, designed to identify most likely N/C (from the FMEA) first, before wasting time on subsequent measures. Often different parts of the same part had the same dimension, but had been produced in a separate operation and thus had to be measured separately and DISTINCTLY (to identify which process went with which dimension as an aid in problem solving in the event of an N/C.)

Different inspection sheets were created for in-process SPC charting and for both First Article and Final Inspection. Above all, we wanted to eliminate opportunities for error and to make the inspection processes as efficient and capable of being replicated as possible - either by our own in-house folks doing redundant inspections or by customers doing receiving inspection.

The identity of the type of instrument used on each dimension was important. We had a chart to identify each instrument used in an inspection of a sample by serial number, thus the instrument itself could be recalled if there was a suspicion a faulty instrument out of calibration was the cause of any N/C reading.

Anybody and everybody in our organization was empowered to halt manufacture if a N/C were suspected, calling in as much help as necessary to affirm or deny the suspicion before the manufacture was restarted.

Elsewhere in the Cove, over the years, I have described how our operation evolved from traditional manufacture and inspection departments to the point where manufacturing folk performed the routine inspections and quality department folk acted as designers of each part's inspection process in collaboration with each customer, then would act as trainers for the manufacturing folk to perform those inspections, and act as arbiters if a redundant inspection was required.

Everything was slanted to make every part of the manufacturing process flow as smoothly and efficiently as possible, removing bottlenecks and choke points along the way, making liberal use of mistake proofing concepts on every aspect of our operation.

If it's important, we could probably find links to those posts.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T Primary & Secondary Inspection Definitions - Incoming, In-process & Final Inspection Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
C Are these Final Inspection Process Checklists required? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
M Incoming, In-Process, Final and Outgoing Quality Inspection Procedure examples Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
T In-Process vs. Final Inspection Manufacturing and Related Processes 15
V Sampling Plan for Final Inspection and Process Verification Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 21
L In-Process and Final Inspection for a job shop (Machine) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
J Software or template to manage first piece, in process and final inspection reports Software Quality Assurance 2
V Final inspection as process step in PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 11
S Kaizen event for the final QA inspection process - Kaizen help Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 7
P No In-process or first piece inspection - Final Inspection ONLY! Am I wrong? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 37
K Process Control Plan and Inspection Plans - Receiving and final inspection required? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
I Mother bobbin final inspection criteria Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
A Doubt on multiple inspection carrying out for same balloon number during Stage Inspection and Final Inspection? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
S 100% Final Inspection Requirements of Active Medical Devices (MDD or IEC Standards?) EU Medical Device Regulations 4
QMMike Software to Record Detailed Final Audit / Inspection Data Software Quality Assurance 2
S Required PFMEA Content - Final QC Inspection FMEA and Control Plans 7
alonFAI Finished PCB Final Visual Inspection Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
R Goods Inwards And Final Inspection Stamps Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
A Does ISO/TS 16949:2009 require us to perform Final/Pre-dispatch Inspection? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
N Final Inspection Retesting for Failed Batches Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6
P MDD position on Final Inspection/Release Employee Experience/Training EU Medical Device Regulations 1
P AS9100 and Final Inspection of Machined Parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
B CNC Machining Shop still heavily relies on First Piece and Final QC Inspection Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
B "Detection, NOT Prevention!" - Relying on Final Inspection Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 48
M Developing a CPI for First Pass Yield Final Inspection - Need help Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 7
E Our Lean Initiative Manager is trying to eliminate Final Inspection Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
Q SMT Final Inspection Sampling Plan for boards off an SMT line Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
T CP: Is it feasible to define the inspection equipment as final function tester? APQP and PPAP 12
L Do all gages need calibration or only those used for final inspection? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 49
M Control Plan: How to include Final Inspection FMEA and Control Plans 3
T Final inspection and testing of product from validated processes Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 1
Z MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) for gages used in final inspection Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
B Pre-Inspection & Final Inspection Procedures and ISO 9001 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
R Basic training needs for Final Inspection people Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
V Can give me the sampling plan for Receiving and Final inspection - AS9100? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
K Final Inspection for Software Product - Functional Test? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
J Final Inspection - 1st Article Dimensions before Anodize and Passivation Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
H No Final Inspection - Can this kind of a policy meet ISO 9001 requirements? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
O Final Inspection - QTY (Quantity) Check - Offset Printing Service Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
M Determine if your final inspection practices are 'waste' or not Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 35
S First Article Inspection in an AS9100 service industry (Final product non tangable) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 13
X Is final inspection necessary? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
S NonConforming product NCR during Manufacturing vs. NCR only at final inspection AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 21
A Final Inspection - Calibrated M&TE (Measurement and Test Equipment)? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
Q Final Inspection lot failures - AQL based final acceptance AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 3
J 'Final Inspection' and 'Layout & Functional Testing' - Part of Control Plan? FMEA and Control Plans 9
H Hoeyster QM - Goal: Eliminate "Final Inspection" - Aerospace precision machining AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
Z 4.10.4 Final Inspection and Testing - Wondering what kind of methods you guys use Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
J Final Inspections - Does 100% inspection really work Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
A Define Final Inspection Requirements on the Control Plan? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom