C
cadevon
Hi,
So my company is currently revising a prototype respiratory device which incorporates two flow meters.
In the process of doing some V/V testing, I realized that we have no reliable way of calibrating these or accurately verifying their output. We have a different brand of flow meter, but it is no more accurate than those incorporated in the design and led to a debate of which one we trust more.
I am now in the market for a NIST traceable mass flow meter (similar to Alicat M series) to use as our standard to test with. Problem is, they're reasonably expensive ($1000+) and we have a small budget as we work mainly with non-profits.
What is the recommended course of action? Do we just use the secondary meter that we already have, look for more accurate (non-NIST) meters, or push for the investment in a NIST traceable model?
Thanks!
So my company is currently revising a prototype respiratory device which incorporates two flow meters.
In the process of doing some V/V testing, I realized that we have no reliable way of calibrating these or accurately verifying their output. We have a different brand of flow meter, but it is no more accurate than those incorporated in the design and led to a debate of which one we trust more.
I am now in the market for a NIST traceable mass flow meter (similar to Alicat M series) to use as our standard to test with. Problem is, they're reasonably expensive ($1000+) and we have a small budget as we work mainly with non-profits.
What is the recommended course of action? Do we just use the secondary meter that we already have, look for more accurate (non-NIST) meters, or push for the investment in a NIST traceable model?
Thanks!