FM&SP Procedures Manual PNP05-007
> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 15:28:15 +0100
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Required Accreditation
>
> I'm one of the people on the A2LA accreditation committee for our
> materials testing laboratory. We have proceeded to the point we are
> sending in our application this week, but the head of the Technical
> Services Department who is wondering why we are bothering after getting
> our QS9000 registration raised a point. We were informed "informally" by
> Ford reps that we had to. However when we ask for something specific, in
> writing, saying "Thou shalt", all of a sudden everyone at Ford seems to
> lose our return address and our fax number. We have tried through
> multiple channels to get something specific, in writing, as to the
> accreditation requirement. Has anyone out there had this problem, and if
> successsful in getting something in writing, how did you get it?
>
> Gary Agler
> Senior Lab Technician
> Goshen Rubber Co.
Subject: Required Accreditation RE2
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 12:26:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Greg Gogates <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 07:24:05 -0500
From: Dan Indish [email protected]
To: Greg Gogates <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Required Accreditation
This Ford requirement is established in a Ford internal purchasing document. The document comes from FM&SP Procedures Manual PNP05-007, revision 1 established 19 Sept. 1997 and revised Nov. 4 1997. There is a possible third revision to this document.
The reason this document is difficult to obtain is because it contradicts the exemption by Ford of this requirement in the current QS-9000 document.
The QS-9000 standard and the purchasing procedure were influenced by two different management factions within Ford. We were told that the purhasing requirement, as a contract requirement, supercedes the QS-9000 statement.
I have a copy of this document that I can fax if you contact me off-line at 401-886-2529.
Dan Indish
> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 15:28:15 +0100
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Required Accreditation
>
> I'm one of the people on the A2LA accreditation committee for our
> materials testing laboratory. We have proceeded to the point we are
> sending in our application this week, but the head of the Technical
> Services Department who is wondering why we are bothering after getting
> our QS9000 registration raised a point. We were informed "informally" by
> Ford reps that we had to. However when we ask for something specific, in
> writing, saying "Thou shalt", all of a sudden everyone at Ford seems to
> lose our return address and our fax number. We have tried through
> multiple channels to get something specific, in writing, as to the
> accreditation requirement. Has anyone out there had this problem, and if
> successsful in getting something in writing, how did you get it?
>
> Gary Agler
> Senior Lab Technician
> Goshen Rubber Co.
Subject: Required Accreditation RE2
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 12:26:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Greg Gogates <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 07:24:05 -0500
From: Dan Indish [email protected]
To: Greg Gogates <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Required Accreditation
This Ford requirement is established in a Ford internal purchasing document. The document comes from FM&SP Procedures Manual PNP05-007, revision 1 established 19 Sept. 1997 and revised Nov. 4 1997. There is a possible third revision to this document.
The reason this document is difficult to obtain is because it contradicts the exemption by Ford of this requirement in the current QS-9000 document.
The QS-9000 standard and the purchasing procedure were influenced by two different management factions within Ford. We were told that the purhasing requirement, as a contract requirement, supercedes the QS-9000 statement.
I have a copy of this document that I can fax if you contact me off-line at 401-886-2529.
Dan Indish
