FMEA DOGMA about Severity - Am I right or Wrong?

C

Carmine

#1
According the AIAG and Ford Manual, when evaluated the product effect in the DFMEA and PFMEA about a particular fail, the two product effect the should be logically the same.
In the DFMEA we have to reach a particular requirement, and we have to evaluate the related failure mode and their effect.
In PFMEA we are going to reach a particular requirement with an operation a with a tool, so the analysis of effects should be extended also to the process the process effect. And the severity related to this fail is the higher between the Product and Process.
An Example: The noise of a powertrain or steering component can have a medium impact on the System/End User but can cause scraps and downtime on te line. So in this case the overall severity ranking related to this fail is given by the process fail.

THIS IS MY INTERPRETATION OF MANUAL. Now
I discussed many time with some colleagues of mine, she said:" in the Process FMEA the severity is given only by th DFMEA and they must be the same. This severity is untouchable"
I reply "
But according the Manual only the two product effect are the same not the severity, because in the PFMEA we have to evaluate also the effect on the process"

I see that this rule DFMEA SEVERITY=PFMEA SEVERITY is so frequent.

According your experience, who is right? The colleagues of mine or myself.

Thanks all in advance & Happy New Year!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
Carmine: You didn't mention if you produced a process flow between performing the DFMEA and the PFMEA. It's usual to lay out the manufacturing process, from which the PFMEA is derived - transport of the product may lead to some damage for example. So, in general terms you are correct, but if you don't explain to your colleague the use of the sequence of "Process Flow - PFMEA - Control Plan", you may still end up arguing.
 
A

adamsjm

#3
<snip> I see that this rule DFMEA SVERITY=PFMEA SEVERITY is so frequent. <snip>
For the purposes of the PFMEA the rule is Severity = max(DFMEA_Severity, PFMEA_Severity).
An example: an oversized dimension on the DFMEA may result in a condition where an "Audible Noise can be noticed by most customers (> 75%), but the item is operable and does not conform to specification." Therefore, the DFMEA_Severity is equal to a 4.
In order to produce the dimensional feature a person may be injured with warning. Therefore the PFMEA_Severity is a 9.
For the purposes of the PFMEA the severity is = max(4,9) = 9.
This does not change the effect, DFMEA_Severity, of the feature.

What should happen: The PFMEA team should undertake measures to reduce the process severity. If they cannot reduce the possibility, then they should work with the design team to change the design in order reduce the potential of production injuries.
While this sound like what you are saying, "the DFMEA oversized should reflect the severity of the PFMEA," it does not. The oversized dimension still has a DFMEA_Severity of a 4,
BUT the DFMEA should reflect a NEW requirement which recognizes the potential for an injury during production which carries a DFMEA_Severity of a 9. Any design change to support the production team in their severity reduction activity would be documented within this requirement.

Hope this helps.
 

Attachments

Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Industrial Inkjet FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 5
D Twin Screw Extrusion FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 5
M FMEA Severity Scores Between Two Sister divisions? FMEA and Control Plans 6
Casana Step 7 in AIAG/VDA FMEA form FMEA and Control Plans 16
C FMEA Severity Rating for aggravating failures IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
A FMEA Official Rankings S-O-D? FMEA and Control Plans 9
R FMEA's for non-manufacturing sites FMEA and Control Plans 4
M ISO 14971:2019 vs FMEA methodology ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 23
Y FMEA link to Control Plan frequency and sample size FMEA and Control Plans 19
A FMEA Software IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Dan Pare Ford CSR Update (FMEA's) - January 2022 FMEA and Control Plans 24
H RPN in AIaG-VDA FMEA Manual FMEA and Control Plans 1
M Process FMEA for Laser Cutting/Press Brake/Welding FMEA and Control Plans 2
L Looking for Control Plan and FMEA Stamping process FMEA and Control Plans 2
OpExPro AIAG VDA FMEA Rating Tables FMEA and Control Plans 5
OpExPro The note at the bottom of DFMEA occurrence tables in AIAG VDA FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 0
Q FMEA and Risk assessment in Microsoft Access FMEA and Control Plans 6
W FMEA - Current control and occurrence rating FMEA and Control Plans 3
J FMEA Handbook 2019 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
J Process FMEA Template with examples - Cold and Hot Forged components FMEA and Control Plans 4
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
P Design FMEA - Detection Rating criteria ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
J Which OEM or customers are now requiring the new AIAG/VDA FMEA format? FMEA and Control Plans 7
C AIAG/VDA FMEA - Is the new better? FMEA and Control Plans 0
I Does anybody use Detection in medical device Design FMEA? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 25
P VDA AIAG FMEA - Slides for Quality Audience FMEA and Control Plans 4
P Design FMEA for Industrial Machinery FMEA and Control Plans 3
B AIAG/VDA’s FMEA Manual Is a Major Advance (my take on this subject) FMEA and Control Plans 2
B AIAG-VDA FMEA - When the new format will be required FMEA and Control Plans 6
D Where does "as far as possible" stop? FMEA - EN 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 29
R What are the changes in 5th Edition of FMEA manual? FMEA and Control Plans 6
M Risk and Corrective actions - Currently no FMEA's - Car systems Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 8
C FMEA Process assessment In the Draft for the AIAG/VDA FMEA Manual is gone FMEA and Control Plans 0
Jimmy123 Example of a P-Diagram for Process FMEA - Uncontrollable noises FMEA and Control Plans 39
Jimmy123 FMEA - Preventive vs Detection Control FMEA and Control Plans 7
M MANUAL FMEA VDA VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 1
L Which one is more important for FMEA CC or SC, FMEA and Control Plans 6
G FMEA financial benefits APQP and PPAP 2
M Foundation FMEA: what is it? FMEA and Control Plans 15
eule del ayre Merging FMEA and Quality Control Process Flow FMEA and Control Plans 0
K AIAG/VDA FMEA & Process Control Plans FMEA and Control Plans 0
D FMEA-MSR in the AIAG-VDA Aligned Handbook - What is it? FMEA and Control Plans 5
bobdoering Catching up on the new FMEA book! Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 2
bobdoering AIAG VDA FMEA Handbook - 2019 - something familiar about this.... FMEA and Control Plans 37
S New AIAG FMEA Process - How to complete the new format FMEA and Control Plans 32
C FMEA - Multiple function failures considerations FMEA and Control Plans 3
J New FMEA aproach - formular Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
B Confusion on the new FMEA guidebook - Are we supposed to replace our FMEAs? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Z Using FMEA for Knowledge Management FMEA and Control Plans 6
D Link between FMEA, flow chart and control plan FMEA and Control Plans 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom