FMEA Starting point

Candi1024

Quite Involved in Discussions
#1
I am working on a process FMEA. Typically I would use the process specs/outputs as the starting point, then list all possible causes of failure.

However many of the FMEA forms start with process inputs and then work into what the effects would be if those inputs failed.

Is my method not robust? I am working on a retrospective PQ and personally I am only worried about the process outputs and risk mitigation for those outputs.

BTW, I'm really not asking for my own purposes, more just for conversation. I'm happy with my method for what I am doing. However since we won't be able to discuss this in the future, I thought I would ask now.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#2
*I* always think of it as a flow: inputs -> function -> outputs
the function is what fails: in 4 possible ways, complete, partial, intermittent and unexpected.
the inputs to the function are the possible causes
the outputs are the start of the effect chain...
 
K

Krocpok

#3
I think you do it well.
General assumption of FMEA is that inputs of individual process steps (apart from your first process step, for ex. material delivery) are always correct.
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#4
I think you do it well.
General assumption of FMEA is that inputs of individual process steps (apart from your first process step, for ex. material delivery) are always correct.
but if the inputs are always correct what can go wrong? :(
 

Jim Wynne

Leader
Admin
#5
but if the inputs are always correct what can go wrong? :(
Krocpok is correct. The idea is for the FMEA team to concentrate on what might go wrong in the current step or process. Upstream processes have presumably been addressed, and it's redundant to go over them again.
 

John Broomfield

Leader
Super Moderator
#6
I am working on a process FMEA. Typically I would use the process specs/outputs as the starting point, then list all possible causes of failure.

However many of the FMEA forms start with process inputs and then work into what the effects would be if those inputs failed.

Is my method not robust? I am working on a retrospective PQ and personally I am only worried about the process outputs and risk mitigation for those outputs.

BTW, I'm really not asking for my own purposes, more just for conversation. I'm happy with my method for what I am doing. However since we won't be able to discuss this in the future, I thought I would ask now.
Candi,

My starting point: make sure the tables for prioritizing risk are approved by an authorized person.

John
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#7
Krocpok is correct. The idea is for the FMEA team to concentrate on what might go wrong in the current step or process. Upstream processes have presumably been addressed, and it's redundant to go over them again.
ah - so it's semantics about what an input is...?
let's say we are dealing with a sealing process. the material thickness, the adhesive layer etc. are all material inputs to be sealed; they are of the correct thickness, chemical composition, etc. Now the sealing process requires parameter settings of time, temperature, pressure, feed rate etc. are these not input parameters of the sealing process? or do some people regard these as the process?
 

Jim Wynne

Leader
Admin
#8
ah - so it's semantics about what an input is...?
let's say we are dealing with a sealing process. the material thickness, the adhesive layer etc. are all material inputs to be sealed; they are of the correct thickness, chemical composition, etc. Now the sealing process requires parameter settings of time, temperature, pressure, feed rate etc. are these not input parameters of the sealing process? or do some people regard these as the process?
Let me rephrase: The idea is to determine defects that are caused in the current operation or process step. The idea is to isolate causes and not go over things that have been addressed upstream. The automotive PFMEA is based on the discrete steps of the process flow diagram. In your example, the process parameters are not considered inputs as such--they are components of the process and should be addressed as possible sources of failure.

All is general and shouldn't necessarily be considered hard-and-fast rules.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Y Stellantis FMEA Report IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News AIAG/VDA harmonized approach to FMEA IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
S AIAG-VDA FMEA tutorial and completely filled FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 1
W Reconciling FMEA RPN ratings with Risk Acceptability ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 12
Q VDA Standard - VDA FMEA VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 9
Y Foundation FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 3
C FMEA Software Report View FMEA and Control Plans 1
G FMEA versus control plan IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
M BMW requirements for FMEA IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
Anerol C FMEA workshop training South of Texas FMEA and Control Plans 0
Anerol C FMEA Training for South Texas Service Industry Specific Topics 0
K Process FMEA responsible For "Make to Design Parts" (Inhouse or Suppliers ?) FMEA and Control Plans 3
M Industrial Inkjet FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 5
D Twin Screw Extrusion FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 5
M FMEA Severity Scores Between Two Sister divisions? FMEA and Control Plans 6
Casana Step 7 in AIAG/VDA FMEA form FMEA and Control Plans 17
C FMEA Severity Rating for aggravating failures IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
A FMEA Official Rankings S-O-D? FMEA and Control Plans 9
R FMEA's for non-manufacturing sites FMEA and Control Plans 4
M ISO 14971:2019 vs FMEA methodology ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 23
Y FMEA link to Control Plan frequency and sample size FMEA and Control Plans 19
A FMEA Software IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Dan Pare Ford CSR Update (FMEA's) - January 2022 FMEA and Control Plans 24
H RPN in AIaG-VDA FMEA Manual FMEA and Control Plans 1
M Process FMEA for Laser Cutting/Press Brake/Welding FMEA and Control Plans 2
L Looking for Control Plan and FMEA Stamping process FMEA and Control Plans 2
OpExPro AIAG VDA FMEA Rating Tables FMEA and Control Plans 5
OpExPro The note at the bottom of DFMEA occurrence tables in AIAG VDA FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 0
Q FMEA and Risk assessment in Microsoft Access FMEA and Control Plans 6
W FMEA - Current control and occurrence rating FMEA and Control Plans 3
J FMEA Handbook 2019 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
J Process FMEA Template with examples - Cold and Hot Forged components FMEA and Control Plans 4
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
P Design FMEA - Detection Rating criteria ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
J Which OEM or customers are now requiring the new AIAG/VDA FMEA format? FMEA and Control Plans 7
C AIAG/VDA FMEA - Is the new better? FMEA and Control Plans 0
I Does anybody use Detection in medical device Design FMEA? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 25
P VDA AIAG FMEA - Slides for Quality Audience FMEA and Control Plans 4
P Design FMEA for Industrial Machinery FMEA and Control Plans 3
B AIAG/VDA’s FMEA Manual Is a Major Advance (my take on this subject) FMEA and Control Plans 2
B AIAG-VDA FMEA - When the new format will be required FMEA and Control Plans 6
D Where does "as far as possible" stop? FMEA - EN 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 29
R What are the changes in 5th Edition of FMEA manual? FMEA and Control Plans 6
M Risk and Corrective actions - Currently no FMEA's - Car systems Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 8
C FMEA Process assessment In the Draft for the AIAG/VDA FMEA Manual is gone FMEA and Control Plans 0
Jimmy123 Example of a P-Diagram for Process FMEA - Uncontrollable noises FMEA and Control Plans 39
Jimmy123 FMEA - Preventive vs Detection Control FMEA and Control Plans 7
M MANUAL FMEA VDA VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 1
L Which one is more important for FMEA CC or SC, FMEA and Control Plans 6
G FMEA financial benefits APQP and PPAP 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom