G
gburns
Regarding Lockheed joining in: yeah, I'm anticipating that all of the air framers and major subcontractors will be requiring it within the next year or two. Some will have a solid flow-down, others will simply mumble about it's being an industry standards, but regardless of the contractual call-out it will likely evolve into being everyone's expectation.
To clarify: we were already doing a verification of all of the dimensional characteristics on details and subassemblies, we just weren't attaching all of the raw material and special process certifications to those inspection reports (they were filed separately elsewhere). Plus, the FAI results were recorded on our company forms which do not include ALL of the AS9102 mandated information items.
Nor were we attaching all of the detail FAIs to the top assy level FAI, in part because of the incredible bulk and duplication this makes. For example, if a specific detail is used in several different assemblies one would need to include copies of it in each of the assembly FAIs, plus all of the raw mat'l certs, special process certs, etc. Plus, some of our assemblies have BOMs with hunreds of detail parts...we only get a few hundred to a few thousand bucks for most of our parts...very little margin to cover such nonproductive activity. What a PITA. Guess we'll have to invest in some more filing cabinets, and hire folks to wade through this mire. (I think it could have been designed more efficiently in case my sarcasm is too subtle.)
To clarify: we were already doing a verification of all of the dimensional characteristics on details and subassemblies, we just weren't attaching all of the raw material and special process certifications to those inspection reports (they were filed separately elsewhere). Plus, the FAI results were recorded on our company forms which do not include ALL of the AS9102 mandated information items.
Nor were we attaching all of the detail FAIs to the top assy level FAI, in part because of the incredible bulk and duplication this makes. For example, if a specific detail is used in several different assemblies one would need to include copies of it in each of the assembly FAIs, plus all of the raw mat'l certs, special process certs, etc. Plus, some of our assemblies have BOMs with hunreds of detail parts...we only get a few hundred to a few thousand bucks for most of our parts...very little margin to cover such nonproductive activity. What a PITA. Guess we'll have to invest in some more filing cabinets, and hire folks to wade through this mire. (I think it could have been designed more efficiently in case my sarcasm is too subtle.)
Last edited by a moderator: