Gage R&R Standard Deviations

stm08007

Starting to get Involved
#1
Hello,
Hopefully my screenshot is visible! Studying for the CQE and looking through the primer, and I am getting hung up on a few parts of this page.

1) the total observed variation is found to be 0.881 based on the 0.701 sigma_proc and 0.534 sigma_meas. Fine that makes sense. But then it says "the measurement error constitutes a substantial portion of the total observed variation- about 37%". Where does that come from? Sigma_observed=0.881, and 0.534 is not 37% of that figure...

2) for the final sentence where it says "obviously the 49% consumed by the measuring system is too large" - what would be acceptable, 30%?

MODERATOR NOTE: Clip of copyrighted test document removed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

stm08007

Starting to get Involved
#2
One more question on this section:

The same data is plotted on a control chart for each technician (after using ANOVA to find that process variation accounted for about 59% of the total variation). I dont understand the point that over half of the data points would be expected to fall outside of the control limits. Anyone have any idea on that too?


MODERATOR NOTE: Clip of copyrighted test document removed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#3
Howdy,

Since you posted screenshots which were then (correctly) deleted, your questions are not complete and thus hard to understand.

Can you ask your questions more fully without violating copyright?
 

stm08007

Starting to get Involved
#4
Howdy,

Since you posted screenshots which were then (correctly) deleted, your questions are not complete and thus hard to understand.

Can you ask your questions more fully without violating copyright?
Ugh I was afraid that'd happen.. Difficult to do all the formula subscripting, etc myself.
1) sigma_process was found to be 0.701 and sigma_measurement was found to be 0.534. Plugging these into formula sigma_observed = sqrt[ (sigma_process)^2 + (sigma_measurement)^2] gives us a sigma_observed of 0.881. The book then says "the measurement error constitutes a substantial portion of the total observed variation (37%)". If sigma_measurement is 0.534, and sigma_observed is 0.881, that's not 37%. Is "measurement error" not the same as "sigma_measurement"? (if so, "measurement error" was not clearly defined in the text before this.

2) it then uses the formula [(5.15)(sigma_meas)/tolerance] to find the percentage of tolerance consumed by the measuring system. The resulting value is 49% and it says this is obviously too large--- what is acceptable, 30%?

3) This one will be more difficult to explain without looking at the actual page, but it shows a control chart of each appraiser (with 2 measurements each per part of 5 parts)-- so it's an X-bar chart with 5 values per appraiser. all but 1 value is within the control limits.
The text goes on to explain that the area within the control limits represents the measurement sensitivity. Since the group of parts being measured represents part variation, approximately 50% or more of the averages should fall OUTSIDE the control limits.. I don't understand why that would be so.
It says since the chart doesnt show this pattern either the measurement system lacks effective resolution or the samples do not represent the expected process variation.
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#5
1) Standard deviations are not additive, but variances are additive, so they obtain 37% using the variances.
2) It depends. < 10% is definitely acceptable, but 10% - 30% may be acceptable depending on the application. > 30 % is not acceptable.
3) On an gage R&R the control limits represent the zone in which a gage cannot distinguish between parts. Therefore, it can see and distinguish between parts that are outside of these limits. The limits represent the gages effective resolution or ability to discriminate between parts.
 

stm08007

Starting to get Involved
#6
1) Standard deviations are not additive, but variances are additive, so they obtain 37% using the variances.
2) It depends. < 10% is definitely acceptable, but 10% - 30% may be acceptable depending on the application. > 30 % is not acceptable.
3) On an gage R&R the control limits represent the zone in which a gage cannot distinguish between parts. Therefore, it can see and distinguish between parts that are outside of these limits. The limits represent the gages effective resolution or ability to discriminate between parts.
3) so the standard assumption is that half the points being looked at fall outside the limits?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Gage R&R - Anova Method - Standard Deviations vs. Variances Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
U-DOG Root Cause for a Form not having all info (traceability standard and the gage number) Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 14
J Standard / Brown & Sharp Gage Tower model E8-5000 Manual General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
A Help with acceptable screw gage values per standard BS 919 for Go/ No Go gage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
0 Gage R&R Standard for Multi Location Fixtures Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
M Calibration Cycle for Standard Iron & Steel Plate Gage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 17
B "Historical std deviation" (Standard Deviation) in Gage R&R study Using Minitab Software 6
P Use of ANSI Standard for Metric Thread Plug Gage? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M ASME B1.13M Standard - Specification of a Plug Gage of Minor Diamateter Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
B Why do a Gage R&R more than once? TS 16949 standard for GR&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
J Chrysler Gage Standard - Gage standard for all Tier II stamping gages Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
Q 'GO' & 'NO GO' Thread Plug Gage Standard Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 17
K Gage R&R - Rockwell Scale - Hardness using Standard Test blocks Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
K What the industry standard is for attribute gage tolerances - In Writing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
M DaimlerChrysler Gage Standard - Where to find PSO 5th edition requirements Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
P Gage R&R and non-normal distribution - Alternatives to a standard gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
A Gage R&R for Pressure Transducers - What GR&R procedure / formula (standard) is best? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
M Gage R&R (Ranges Method) - Reproducibility standard deviation Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
R Is there a update Revision on Mil-Std-120 Gage Inspection Standard & Requirement General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
B Gage calibration frequency, ISO and IATF - What are the requirements Calibration Frequency (Interval) 3
R Determining Uncertainty from Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
C Correct Calibration Method for Dial Depth Gage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
C Gage Block Wringing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B Gage R&R with NDC=1 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 19
S Type 1 Gage R&R or something else? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 6
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
V Thread Plug Gage Pitch GO Diameter out of spec AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 8
G Gage R&R - Where am I going wrong? Part of a FAIR submission (Aerospace) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
R Gage R&R Excel templates Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
K Gage R&R with more than 3 appraisers Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
Anerol C Gage R&R Template AIAG 4th Edition IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
T Attributes SPC study - Attributive control (Go gage) Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
S Capability or Gage R&R Study for Leak Tester? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 15
N % Tolerance - Type 1 study on the gages, then a gage R&R (ANOVA) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
M Definitive answer on Type 1 vs Type 2 vs Type 3 Gage Study Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
V Gage Management and Gage R&R Software General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
D Gage R&R Study on Load Cells - Large chemical blending tanks IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
B Minitab Type 1 Gage Study on True Position Question Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
S Gage R&R on alloy Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
8 Need Help - Runout - Function Gage Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
L Gage R&R studies for identical Devices - Need to confirm the requirement to perform them Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
G Stab Pin Size For Check Gage Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
E Functional Gage for TOP applied at RFS Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
F No reproducibility Error in Gage R&R? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
M Template for Attribute Gage R & R wanted Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
G Warning about Deltronic Gage Pins - The "Certification of Accuracy" document General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
A Gage type 1 study on CMM Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
Q Gage R&R for Instant Measurement Machine Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M Gage R&R with large inter part variance - Torque Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
D Do we need normal data for gage r&r studies? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom