Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility (Gage R&R) on all shop floor gages?

R

Ram narayan

#1
I want to know whether GR&R studies had to be conducted on all gauges used in the shop floor or only for a family of gauges. (Like 0-25mm Mics, 0-150mm Verniers etc..) ie.. one instrument from that family. I think that it make sense to conduct GR&R for one instrument from one family because what we are trying to conclude is whether that instrument is suitable for measuring a product characteristic.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#2
You don't have to *do* gage R&R on anything. You can use other studies.

The point is MSA as a high level system has to be considered. Basically you address all gages, etc., which you take measurements with which 'affect quality'. In the case of inspection and test gages, typically Gage R&R is part of the standard studies.

You start hitting touchy ground when you want to do an R&R on one gage as evidence of family 'compliance'. If you want to get down to the nitty gritty it can be, and often is, argued that a study has to be done on each gage used for inspection and test on the actual parts and with the actual operators - this is quite often the case.

And you have to look at the family of which you speak. Are they all the same brand from the same manufacturer and are they the same model (etc.)? I saw one situation where a 'qualification by similarity' failed.Same gage and model but one was 5 years older than the first. From that there were/are a lot of reasons why they may *not* be alike.

We come back to common sense and an implied understanding of MSA. As you go through design (APQP) youi have to look at the situation as a whole - What precision is necessary, etc. This is where you decide what you have to do to 'prove' your measurement and test equipment as well as the environment it is used in and such.

You have to be ready to explain to the auditor what you're doing and why. Proof (studies) may or may not be in order, but it appears auditors are wanting more and more evidence - so specific, extended studies will probably be more important in the future.

Can you 'qualify by similarity or family'? Yes - if you have good evidence that your hypothesis is true.
 
C

Christian Lupo

#3
If you are a QS-9000 certified company or you have plans to be the answer is simple. All equipment defined in the control plan must have MSA, which includes GRR. Calipers and mics will need GRR. It is not acceptable to perform MSA on one gage, and have it represent a family of gages of the same type. Remember GRR measures the total variation in a specific gage not a family of gages. No two gages are the same, therefore they will have different levels of variation.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#4
Christian - I disagree with you here. Some common sense is involved. You do not have to do a gage R&R on every instrument on the control plan. It was not long ago that all the big 3 wanted was a gage R&R - it was a defacto standard. Now it came to pass that the big 3 found out about Measurement Systems Analysis. Well, they knew it was there (sorta) 'cause there was this great AIAG manual.

When auditors came and checked out the requirement of QS9000, they really (early on) just looked for common sense, a base understanding of MSA (is the rightr equipment chosen, and such), a strong calibration system and gage R&R. Over the last year most of the registrars are stressing MSA more. I'm not sure why. I know the first report to come to me was that UL was acting an ass again (I get lots of 'complaints' about UL).

I just went thru this with LRQA at Motorola in May. We did not graph studies of bias and such. I'd go into detail but I've typed responses to these MSA issues several times already that I refuse to do it again.

If you take a cruise to ***DEAD LINK REMOVED*** you will find this discussed a number of places.

In the 'new' QS9000 MSA is addressed in 4.11.4 where it states: "Appropriate statistical studies shall be performed..." Keyword = APPROPRIATE

This leaves it to you to do what you can justify as 'appropriate'. If an R&R is not approprite, then it's not appropriate.

We come back to this: Can you explain what you are doing and why?

Hell - most of the auditors I've come up against are MSA stupid anyway. At best most understand one part of MSA as a high level system - they understand Calibration Systems Requirements - NOT MSA. One of the most important parts of the whole thing is upfront - determination of appropriate M&TE - how many autitors have you heard ask to be taken thru the selection process?

My 10 cents....
 
S

Steven Sulkin

#5
The question was asked, do all gages have to be studied? My question is, do all products have to be studied? We have gages that are used for a bazillion products, many having different specs. Our data collection is also unusually expensive.

Is there a simple approach to this? Going back to Marc's comments, "what percision is necessary," we need a percision that is enough to prevent significant type I and type II errors. I define this as, "RR cant be more than 30% of tolerance." If my definition holds, I should only have to do studies for the products with the tightest specs. As long as they meet my rule (<30%), I should be ok right?

Also, if I find that many gages are above 30%, but I have action plans in place and work being done to get to the below 30% mark, can I still be certified?
 
C

Christian Lupo

#6
Marc-

Actually you do agree with me; I guess I didn't make the distinction between MSA and GRR. What I meant to say is that a compny must use MSA on all IM&TE in the control plan. MSA not necessarily means GRR. As an example of what I mean, the last QS-9000 registration audit I performed I wrote the company up for not following the MSA manual eventhough they had done GRR studies. Their equipment was mostly calipers. Upon further investigation this particular company did not evaluate linearity, bias, stability, resoultion, range of use etc... How could they evaluate total variation (GRR) if they did not even know the variation inherent in their equipment?
 

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#7
When it says in QS 4.11.4 that "this requirement shall apply to the measurement system referenced in the Control Plan" can I submit results of a system that I have used in another submission or does it have to be specific to the part I am submitting?
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#8
Typically R&R is done (or other validation of the system or instrument) on the item as is on the control plan. But - you have to look at frequency and such as to what studies you have to do at all.

And - depends upon the measurement being taken and the system as a whole with consideration to the techniques you are using to validate. For example, R&R is on a specific dimension of a specific part (or multiple dimensions in cases such as a with a CMM - which is really an R since there's only one operator) per the control plan line item number.

I think, Howard, we're back to some common sense. As an auditor I typically expect to see a match with the control plan, though.

Why don't you start a new thread with some details and we can bandy it about.
 
B

Batman

#9
Regarding GRR, we have had success with our QS9000 auditors demonstrating "family of gages" as they apply to "family of parts." Also we have multiple gages of similar type, and we select random gages within the family when GRR are performed. Our control plans are primarily for the "family of parts," so a "family of gages" approach fits.
Re frequency of GRR, our Ford STE was in today and stated we need to "update our GRR every year, as stated in the AIAG."
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#10
I wouldn't have a problem with that approach. You can prove statistically that which gage of the family of gages makes no different in the result. I think some auditors would not have this paradigm, however.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
U Gauge repeatability and reproducibility (Gage R&R) worksheets Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
D Determining Gauge R&R (Repeatability and Reproducibility) Interval Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
D Gage R&R Repeatability - How do I know my gauge is in specification Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
F Calibrating Taper Sleev/Plug Gauge General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
I How many gauges in a Go/No Go Gauge? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
J Standard used to determine if check fixture gauge is acceptable Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
J Designing new gauge tracking software IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
R Gauge R&R on pre-set torque wrench Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
C Aluminum galling on thread plug gauge Manufacturing and Related Processes 10
J Gauge R&R on a torque measurement Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
K I’m looking for a square probe for my linear height gauge Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
A Gauge Study for Small Lots Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
G Supplier Checking With Gauge Pin Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 2
H Analog Pressure Gauge with no EN837 accuracy class information General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
H Thread Plug Gauge Tolerances General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
R Do Brands Matter When Purchasing Bore Gauge? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
D Using "Particle Size Standard" templates as gauges - How to avoid giving a gauge # while using for process control? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
D AS9100 Inspection records - Is there a requirement to have gauge ID and calibration status AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
G Comparing Gauge Blocks - Translating the calibration between the master set and the QA set General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
F Gauge R&R & Calibration Intervals Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 14
Ron Rompen Source needed for Spline Form gauge (GO and NOGO members) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
S How to calculate the maximum allowable hysteresis of a pressure gauge General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
S Gauge R and R - Product - Conveyor belt with threads that goes on Sprocket Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
R Feeler Gauge Calibration - What tolerance is used for calibrating feeler gauges? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
F Holes position inspection - Calculation of centre distance and plug sizes of a gauge Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
K Measurement Uncertainty Budget (MU) of for Ultrasonic Thickness gauge Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
R Radius Gauge R&R Study Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
A Calibration of Pressure Gauge, How to Determine Calibration Tolerance General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
S Thread Ring Gauge verification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
G Uncertainty Budget Examples for Caliper, Micrometer and Dial Gauge Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 3
S Pressure Gauge Calibration Uncertainty Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 5
N Correct reading for analog pressure gauge ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
Ron Rompen Gauge Design Standards Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
B Gauge CAD certification to Part CAD vs. Gauge certification to Part CAD General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
shimonv Feeler Gauge as a Medical Device Accessory EU Medical Device Regulations 3
C Proper Thickness Gauge for Foam/Felt and Soft Materials General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
J What kind of Tool and Gauge in IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.6? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
alonFAI Gauge R&R for a Peel Tester (tensile tester) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
R Height gauge to measure short hard to access heights General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
V Why Gauge R&R 10% is acceptable for variable instruments ? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
B Can we calibrate a standard pin with a gauge? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
C How to perform Gauge R & R on Automated Test & Measurement Equipment Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
I How to determine the thread wire size needed - Buttress Thread Gauge General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
V Inactive Gauge Retention Time - PPAP Section 6 Requirements APQP and PPAP 1
Q Pin Gauge Setup - Measuring the OD of a Catheter Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
kedarg6500 Availability of 5/8" 17.75 TPI Thread Ring Gauge & Die Nut Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
J Gauge R&R for Destructive Test Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
J Thread Gauge Calibration Failure for Pitch Diameter being too large General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
N Procedure/calculation for determining the foot pressure of dial thickness gauge General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom