Government Contract Clauses: Toxic, hazmat and compliance

Kchnwtch

Involved In Discussions
#1
Hello, Elsmar! So glad you're back.

We're doing metal work for a gov't agency and this is our first job of this type. The controller overlooked specific contract callouts on toxic substances/hazardous material exclusions when getting the contract, and now we're having to prove retroactively that our work doesn't contain a whole list of toxics: mercury, pcb's, MEK, lead, chromium, asbestos, etc.

The agency shipped us their own material. They have already gotten their parts back from us. Now they want us to prove that none of these substances exists in our shop or came in contact with the material they provided.

Granted, we messed up. Maybe we write this one off, but they still got their parts, it's their material and they're not planning on giving the parts back.

Sorry, I'll get to the point, questions: 1) Have you ever encountered this situation? How did you manage it? 2) Any thoughts on how to prepare in advance for these restrictions if we get a contract like this again (what can I say, work is slow) 3)Isn't this just a clever way for the agency to get the work for free???

Thanks in advance for all you do for us, Elsmar people! :thanks:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

normzone

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Re: Gov't clauses: toxic, hazmat and compliance

This has the sound of a specific statutory or regulatory standard - Perhaps a DFAR or something. Is there a specific standard your customer referenced?

It may just come down to knowing what is in your shop and being able to legitimately attest that their material did not come in contact with any of the materials referenced.

Nobody expects to get work for free - but somebody in your organization has to review the fine print associated with a contract before you accept it. Sometimes the customer purchase order references other documents you must hunt down, and they're not always where the customer tells you they are. You still have to find them and determine how to deal with the requirements anyway, or push back prior to accepting the order.

Sometimes it can be challenging, other times amusing:

http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=65128
 

Kchnwtch

Involved In Discussions
#3
Re: Gov't clauses: toxic, hazmat and compliance

Yes,normzone, you're right about the DFAR. And thanks for the laugh! I guess what gets me most is that it's the customer's material in the first place, and we did all we were supposed to with traceability, parts-wise. Hopefully this will teach our financial folks to check before they quote. :frust:
 

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#4
The controller overlooked specific contract callouts on toxic substances/hazardous material exclusions when getting the contract, and now we're having to prove retroactively that our work doesn't contain a whole list of toxics: ...
The difference between easy and hard is centered around that word "prove" that you used.

Do you need to "prove"?
...or do you need to "certify" or "attest"?

A Cert saying that the material provided by the buyer did not come in contact with any of the materials listed may be all that they are looking for.
It's DOD...they have paperwork to do, and they need you to do some (usually quite a lot).
See if this isn't simply a simple cert you need to provide...you can be done with it in ten minutes.
With OSHA GHS now in play, folks don't know where the line is anymore...and besides, you've already "attested" to what is in there by the SDS (or lack of) that you sent with the product.

Don't make the mistake of thinking that the person who ordered the stuff, the person who shipped you the material, and the person you shipped it to even know each other's names...

What EXACTLY do they need (not what are they asking for...what do they NEED)? Then give them that. In my experience, a phone call makes all the difference in the world...while it's DOD, the people inside tend to be pretty reasonable and hate the paperwork as much as you do.
 

normzone

Trusted Information Resource
#5
Re: Gov't clauses: toxic, hazmat and compliance

Yes,normzone, you're right about the DFAR. And thanks for the laugh! I guess what gets me most is that it's the customer's material in the first place, and we did all we were supposed to with traceability, parts-wise. Hopefully this will teach our financial folks to check before they quote. :frust:
It may teach them, but usually the learning is proportionate to the pain. And often the terms and conditions are general and painless in the quoting stages, but when the order arrives it is accompanied by more stringent requirements. That's when the screening and negotiation become critical.

And some customers have Ts & Cs that the buyer doesn't even know about - but somebody who does know about it is expecting a specific deliverable and may come asking for it.

To add insult to injury, sometimes months after delivery the customer and their customer return with additional retroactive requirements.

In my position, I review the Ts & Cs that accompany the order, then research the company for other unrevealed expectations. Some customers are nice and boring, just the way we like them, others, not so much.
 
Last edited:

Kchnwtch

Involved In Discussions
#6
Hello, Good Elsmar folks, I need your help, again, please!

We sent a Certificate of Conformance, and it just wasn't enough. The materials belong to the customer--they ship them to us, we saw/turn/mill them, and send them back. No painting or coating happens in our facility.

He is claiming that we somehow have to prove that our facility has no PCBs, Mercury, or asbestos in it. We sent them SDSs/MSDSs on everything that we bought for the jobs--coolant and tooling.

They have the parts we have already made for them in their possession, although if we were to test them who knows what has blown on them at their facility by now?

Here's a quote from the reply we got to our CofC:
"You are definitely on the right track, however I don't think an MSDS or SDS would address this "(Materials known or suspected of containing or coming in contact with asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), or mercury or mercury containing compounds)" especially where coming in contact is concerned...
"[The Contract] basically implies that a supplier should flow down these requirements & in-lieu of flowing down the requirements there are possible other options. By not flowing down the requirements then your sub-tier suppliers for example may not know that a hazardous item that is called out above should not come in contact with material for example and an MSDS or SDS probably would not tell you that. "

[We have no sub-tier suppliers except for tooling, and that is off the shelf, not custom...]

" So if you could please explain to me further how
your company ensures they are in compliance with these requirements."

So, any ideas? Has anyone dealt with this before? Thanks for your help!
 

Kchnwtch

Involved In Discussions
#8
So far, all email. I discovered that the boss had sent everything EXCEPT the COC which I have now made him send. :frust:

From what I can glean from the email, I think the client wants 1) something equivalent to an RoHS statement to go to any suppliers and 2)lab testing for the three contaminants.

Lab testing will end the relationship, I think, because a)it will be cost prohibitive and b)the client isn't going to pre-test the material they send us to cut/turn/mill, so testing would be moot anyway.

I'm developing an RoHS statement for our suppliers, but if I'm buying supplies from, say, MSC, they are going to send me what I order, they are not going to pre-screen my orders for RoHS. Compliance is still up to us.

Sorry to :deadhorse: and many thanks for continuing to read! :thanks:
 

Kchnwtch

Involved In Discussions
#9
So we got a reply, and I think this is the end of our relationship. I'm just posting this here for any learning opportunities it might present:

"you have still not shown me how your tools for example (your saws, coolant, lathes, blades, milling stations special tools, jigs, fixtures, gages and measuring equipment) that you mentioned have not come in contact with any of the items that they are not supposed to come in contact with. Where has your company flowed this requirement down to your sub-tiers (the people who make those tools mentioned above that will be coming in contact with NNS material)? I would think that unless you flow that requirement down your suppliers of these items would not even know the requirement exist and therefore contact with these hazardous items could occur."

We're not AS9100, nor were we required to be to make the parts. Considering the paltry sums we're getting from this client, I think it's time to find a new client.
Thanks to everyone for your time and good advice! I do appreciate it.:thanx:
 

Kchnwtch

Involved In Discussions
#10
So, turns out what they actually wanted was a RoHs statement on each purchase order (specifically for mercury, asbestos and PCBs). I understand the importance of it, but the methods sure get confusing! Thanks for helping me out, y'all.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
GStough "Outsourced Processes" in a Government Contract Service Provider Company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
M Government Contract Product Realization Requirements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
E Customer Satisfaction - Customer Perception of Government Contract Officers ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
R Component traceability in an assembly - Government contract - How far does it go? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 18
R Customer Satisfaction importance in companies with Government/Public Administration as main customer? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
K Capturing local government development/planning activities in aspect register ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
K CFG (certificate of foreign government) Requestor Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
Sidney Vianna Informational ISO 18091 - Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001 in local government Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
F Assignment of Special Characteristics to government regulations IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M NIST is one of the government services shut down General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
S Responsibilities between government owner and private subcontractor of a power plant seeking ISO 9001 certification ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
S Government MotorPool Continuous Improvement ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
bio_subbu Indian government issues guidance on Grouping Medical Devices in a Single Submission Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
D Definition Client - How does the government define their clients? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
A Application of Public Finance Management to Government Institutions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
M Technical Oversight - Government Shipyard Quality Office Responsibilities Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 10
M Eligible to obtain certificate of foreign government (CFG) Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 15
R What can I expect in a Government Source Inspection? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 13
S Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG) - who is an Exporter ? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
S Tailored ISO 9001:2008 for DLA - US Government Contracts and Contractors ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
0 EU Medical Device Requirements and Government Authorities EU Medical Device Regulations 3
K Certificate of Foreign Government (Distributor in Mexico) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
N Government Help to Clean Up Credit to Buy A House? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 24
Marc OH, NO! There are no mermaids: U.S. government World News 1
F ISO 9001 Certification for a Big Government Entity - One Certificate for each Dept.? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
V Safety and/or Government Regulation question on a PSW (Part Submission Warrant) APQP and PPAP 6
C QMS Design Approach for a Government Organisation - Advice sought ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
I What are the Government of India requirements to sell OEM Medical Devices in India? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
T GIDEP Government - Industry Data Exchange Program General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
E Lean in a Government Agency! Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 3
A AIAG Design FMEA Severity Rankings - Noncompliance Government Regulation? FMEA and Control Plans 9
K Definition Long, Wide and High - How to define for a Government (Military) Purchasing spec Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 3
R First Article Acceptance Tests on a Government Product Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 10
Marc Black Ops: How HBGary wrote backdoors for the government After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 1
S FDA Form 3613 [Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG)] - Manufacturer Information 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 14
Sidney Vianna ISO Video (mentions various standards) for Business and Government ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 1
Stijloor The Government can not print money properly... World News 8
T Contractor's Responsibilities for Government Source Inspection Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 9
Michael Malis FDA changed the criteria for Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG) on 12/08/09 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
M CFG - Certificate for Foreign Government - Medical Device Company based in CA, USA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
A Is there any Government Grant for CE marking? (India) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
M Updating Certificate of Foreign Government (CFG's) Other US Medical Device Regulations 18
E Any Government Contractors out there?? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Pancho Forums, blogs and wikis may forge a more inclusive Government Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
L Government Agencies required to meet ISO standards? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
A Certificate for Foreign Government - How long it takes for an approval? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
Marc U.S. rejects GM's call for government financial help in a merger World News 2
Marc Government of Mozambique - Dealing with Lions Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 14
D Official Government Regulatory Body Vigilance Contacts to use for China and for India ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T Venezuela government is asking for "GMP Certification" - Huh? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7

Similar threads

Top Bottom