Handling open points in design reviews

V

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#1
#1
1. for performing a design review, should we have the document in signed off form?
or can we perform design review on 'draft' version of document

2. how do you handle the open / review points from design review., i.e., how and where do you justify for having them open for a given stage.
viz., certain closure/response to "MAUDE database related points" in design inputs is dependent on update from supplier of device component.
hence it could be parked for closure before design validation or commercialization. ( where should i document the justification that it does not affect other aspects of design control activities. viz., design verification, design output, etc)
 
Download Free White Paper
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
somashekar

somashekar

Leader
Admin
#2
#2
As there can be several design review stages as may be determined, the document in any form could highlight the closed and open points, and these are going to be addressed in subsequent reviews. Any justification could also get into the design stage review records.
What actually do you mean by 'draft' version of the document...
 
V

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#3
#3
Thank you Somashekar for quick response,
so, we need to add justification/rationale of target timeline of open points , right in the design review.

somashekar said:
What actually do you mean by 'draft' version of the document...
Click to expand...
viz., when we have to do design review for 'design input' stage,
should the design input document be at draft stage or should it be signed off.
 
somashekar

somashekar

Leader
Admin
#4
#4
Since records of review will be looked up as design progresses, any specific authentic information in it will be of use.
About design inputs, I believe it should be signed off at some point of time after which the reviews can happen.
However since design projects could be over months to year or even more, at times there would be a need to update the design input document. This would be the next revision.
It does not auger well to say that the design inputs are not freezed (draft) and the design stages are in progress.
 
Y

yodon

Leader
Super Moderator
#5
#5
I don't think it's uncommon to include a draft document in a design review. The catch is that you need to be sure that no changes are made other than those driven by the review; otherwise, you would invalidate the review.

Not sure I completely understand the 2nd question. It sounds like you identified some design issues but agree that it's ok to not address them until some later point (if at all). I would definitely capture (document) the issue and document when it will be addressed and why it's ok to defer. If you have to release with the known issue, it would have to be justified based on a risk assessment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Handling of Characteristic FMEA and Control Plans 1
A Report on handling customer property ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
V Handling deviations during analytical method validations Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
C Handling in-Process Defect Repairs Nonconformance and Corrective Action 31
T Is handling chemically treated parts safe? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 18
N Handling B-Grade Products within the QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
M Handling design changes with use-as-is inventory disposition Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
A Complaint review as part of the complaint handling process? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Advice on how to reduce overhead of handling non-conforming material Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
B Handling lower detection limits for SPC and process performance Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
A ISO 10002:2018 Checklist Needed (Complaints Handling) Customer Complaints 5
G Handling Unpacked (Additive Chemical) Product For Automotive Applications IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A Handling of contaminated medical equipment Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 0
B Procedures for Complaint Handling and Post Market Surveillance EU Medical Device Regulations 10
J KPIs or Metrics to Measure a New Complaint Handling Process 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 9
shimonv Rigid rules for handling supplier audit findings ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
Jimmy123 Handling nonfunctional requirements in DFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 5
F Component Molding and Over-molding - Handling Resin Inventory Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
Q Handling Off-the-Shelf Components 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
L AS9100 D- Handling Nonconformance Documentation for an organization that outsources most of the work. AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
P HVAC System vs Air Handling Unit (AHU) - Differences Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
L GMDN code wanted - Software for handling records Service Industry Specific Topics 9
leftoverture Handling Sort/Return Requests Customer Complaints 8
S Document Handling during an Audit General Auditing Discussions 6
S Handling Cost of Sales requests for Customer Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 2
Q AS9100/AS1180-1 - Handling of Equipment and Calibration Records AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 12
M Complaint Handling Responsibilities for a Design Partner - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
S Merging Post Market Surveillance and Complaint Handling ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A ISO 9001 Ergonomics and Manual Handling Requirements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
C Suggestions requested on handling batch record papers exposed to hormonal products Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
A Production and Post-Production and Complaint Handling ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
C What's Your Process for handling rush jobs, urgent or priority orders ? Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
A Medical Device Handling AFTER the device's specified lifetime has expired 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T Handling of Obsolete Material Work Instruction ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
A Risk Management, complaint handling and CAPA system ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
W Aerospace Materials Handling Training AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
V Handling decomissioned line/equipment during 1st time product-based inspection US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
D Complaint Handling Call Centers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
W Contract Initial Importer and Order Handling for a Class I Medical Device Service Industry Specific Topics 2
W SOP on Handling of HCl (Hydrochloric Acid) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
A Handling Normal Capacitor Production Fallout AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
K Procedure for Handling of Customer Supplied Material (AS9100 Requirements) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
M Procedure for Handling Customer Return Part (Defective Part Return) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
M Manufacturer's handling of Distributor's Historical Complaint Records US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
C Anyone have experience handling Feed Safety Management System (GMP+B2)? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
V ISO10002:2004 (Guidelines for Handling Customer Complaints) Self Assessment Checklist Customer Complaints 5
V Ensuring Improvement and Handling Change FMEA and Control Plans 4
S Handling Out-of-Specification Results: FDA's guidance for the industry Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 12
M Internal Warehouse Handling - A Reverse Logistic Case! Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 6
C Corrective Action and Preventive Action for Operator Error (Cosmetic - Handling) Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 15

Similar threads

Top Bottom