Hard Copies from Electronic Media

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#1
I particularly liked this 'rant':

-----snippo-----

Subject: Re: Use of "electronic" doc /../Hankwitz/Summerfield/Pfrang
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 14:48:38 -0600
From: Moderator <[email protected]>

From: [email protected] (Doug Pfrang)

>From: George Summerfield <[email protected]>
>
>Gary:
>
>If your master copy of the document resides on a LAN system, but someone
>needs to print it to take to their workstation, then you have a document
>control problem that must be addressed. On the other hand, you can have it
>stipulated that ANY printed material in your work area is automatically
>considered an 'uncontrolled' document; but that just isn't practical in
>most applications.

I completely disagree that printing a paper copy of an electronic original document automatically creates a "document control problem."

I can prove this by reciting each of the Standard's document control requirements and demonstrating how a printed paper copy meets every requirement:

1. Section 4.5.2 requires: "The documents...shall be reviewed and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel prior to use."

My response: As long as the electronic master is reviewed and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel prior to use, then a printed paper copy of that master is a perfectly valid document. The Standard does not require the paper copies to receive a separate review and approval; however, if you want to cover this possibility, then simply designate the people who make paper copies as "authorized personnel" and have them "review and approve" the paper copy (i.e., confirm that it matches the electronic master) prior to use.

2. Section 4.5.2 also requires: "A master list...identifying the current revision status of documents shall be established and be readily available...."

My response: This language is about the master list, not about the control of the document, so it is not relevant to this proof.

3. Section 4.5.2(a) requires the control procedures to ensure that appropriate documents are available where they are needed.

My response: Paper copies actually help ensure that appropriate documents are available where needed.

4. Section 4.5.2(b) requires the control procedures to ensure that invalid and/or obsolete documents are removed or otherwise not incorrectly used.

My response: Paper copies whose revision level matches the revision level of the electronic master are valid.

5. Section 4.5.2(c) requires that obsolete documents are suitably identified.

My response: Paper copies whose revision level does not match the revision level of the electronic master can easily be identified as obsolete.

6. Section 4.5.3 requires that "Changes...shall be reviewed and approved by the same functions/organizations that performed the original review and approval...."

My response: See my response in number 1 above. As long as the same methods are used to review and approve document changes, this requirement will be satisfied.

Now, I challenge you to cite the specific requirement of the Standard that is violated by printing a paper copy of an electronic original document.

I am sorry if I seem contentious, but I have seen far too many people wrongly assert that something is an ISO violation because they never cite any specific requirement of the Standard that is violated.

>Another way to acquire a document control problem with electronic media is
>to advertise that everything is available for viewing on a web page. But,
>the web master may not be the writer (process owner) of each document.
>John Doe, who has access to his documentation, pulls down his document and
>revises it, then sends you (web master) a copy of the revised edition to
>post to the web page. Unfortunately, you're up to your eyeballs in other
>IT problems and the revision is not posted for a couple of weeks. His
>people are no longer using the proper document, and this could have serious
>repercussions; dependant upon how important that process/procedure document is.
>In short, you have to address how you maintain document control; just like
>it stipulates is 4.5 of the compendium. Whether the document is hard
>(paper) or soft (electronic), it must be controlled. Controlling the
>master copy alone is easy. Most companies have big problems controlling
>the numerous copies of that master copy. Can you decide not to address
>that; no!
>
>George

Frankly, I don't know of any company that has "big problems" controlling the numerous copies of their master documents. They simply put a version number (or a date, which can be equivalent to a version number) on each document, and then as long as the person using the document checks to make sure he or she is using the correct version, there is no problem. Again, like I said above, I challenge you to cite the specific language from the Standard that is violated.

-- Doug
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

barb butrym

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
its simply a matter of discipline and ones own document control procedure. and what is and is not allowed....typically the way it happens is someone is caught using an out dated revision to work on product, then its an issue.

Probably, whoever offered the scenario, left out the details (as so many of us tend to do?)....and its not an ISO issue, but a potential for one ....therefore the generalized statement may have been taken out of context.... It does leave you wide open/vulnerable...and it does lead an auditor to the "what happens if...questions" So as a consultant many try to eliminate the potential problematic scenarios. Then in reverse as a consultant turned auditor, many cannot completely remove the hat, and force their views into the standard. The answer lies in the evidence....was there any evidence to show lack of control or non-adherence to procedure?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Document Retention - Discard hard-copies after scanning? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
L Do you need to save hard copies of obsolete documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
Q Do hard copies of quality records have to be retained? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Are 2 Hard Copies of Procedures and Instructions Required? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
P Document Control - Do hard copies of documents need to be signed? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
G Document Control - Are hard copies required in addition to soft copies maintained? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
L Does ISO 9001 require that hard copies of documents be archived? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
V Hard copies from 10-20 years ago - Document Control and Retention Times question Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 19
C Do you still collect hard copies of objective evidence when auditing? General Auditing Discussions 20
K Are Hard copies necessary? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
J Argentina Asked for FSC Hard-Copy Edition Only Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
qualprod Non conformity, do nothing? Employee experiencing "hard times" ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
W Is it required to stamp obsolete hard copy DHR's "obsolete"? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
supadrai Just found out the hard way that only one registration per manufacturer is allowed in Yemen, regardless of OEM or private label arrangement. Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
A Alternative to keeping hard copy records that is 21 CFR part 11 compliant Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
W Great way to work hard for your career Career and Occupation Discussions 4
R Height gauge to measure short hard to access heights General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
A Identification of Customer Property: Customer-Supplied Thumb Drives & Ext Hard Drives ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
S Having a hard time closing CAR/ PAR Nonconformance and Corrective Action 13
D Hard cut off date for certificates to be issued against ISO 9001:2008? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
S Why is it so hard to close out the CAPAs ? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 16
G Could I destroy my DHR hard copy after 2 years after pdf'ing them ? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
M Best Fit Alignment vs. Hard Datums Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 5
H Layered Process Audit Hard Copy Records Retention Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 6
N Boss is too hard on me.... Career and Occupation Discussions 48
C Hard Copy Documents not in Fireproof Cabinets - Document Storage Questions... ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
I MDNR (Medical Devices National Registry) and Hard Copy Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
T Eliminating "Hard Copy" Manuals from our Office and Shop Floor - Documentation Medium ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Sidney Vianna Why are GOOD Internal Auditors so hard to find? Internal Auditing 35
P Hard Milling Process - Dealing with Within Part Variation for SPC Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 18
Q Uncontrolled Hard Copy (Paper) Document Validity Period Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 12
B Hard Gage Rentals - Thread Gages or Thread Rings General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Marc Tearing Apart a McAfee Hard-Sell Anti-Virus Ad After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 6
Jen Kirley Trying to back up a dead hard drive - how to do it? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 17
S Auslogics Defrag - Hard Drive Defragmentation After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 9
J U.S. National Archives offers reward for missing hard drive After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 1
C Specification (hardness) for stainless steel SUS 310 3/4 Hard Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
BradM It's a hard luck life Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 0
S MSDS Records - Is a hard copy required if I have a scanned copy? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 14
I FMEA Detection Rating - What is Soft or Hard? FMEA and Control Plans 7
P Six Sigma Certification Test - How hard is the Six Sigma Certification Test? Professional Certifications and Degrees 6
ScottK Disposing of old hard drives - Best method to destroy data? After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 17
J What Hardness for .090 Thick Silicone Bronze, Extra Hard Temper (cda 65500-h06) Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
M Does ISO9001 require that a hard copy of a signed procedure be kept? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
J MS Windows XP Pro Hard Drive Defrag (defragmentation) question After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 26
J Engineering having a hard time defining Objectives - ISO 9k2k 5.4.1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Marc 50th Anniversary of the First Hard Drive - Sept. 13, 1956 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 8
J New QA Manager - Top Management is Divided - Between a rock and a hard place IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 73
D Hard to change factors in DOE (Split Plot Designs) - Injection Molded Parts Design and Development of Products and Processes 15
M Long hard work pays off - 8 months - ISO9001 Certification Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9

Similar threads

Top Bottom