Has an Implementation by a Consultant EVER Failed?

We used (or I am) a consultant and at the registration audit:

  • Company - Passed 1st time - Registrar was our choice.

    Votes: 6 20.0%
  • Company - Passed 1st time - Registrar was chosen by our consultant.

    Votes: 1 3.3%
  • Company - Passed 1st time - Did not use a consultant.

    Votes: 10 33.3%
  • Company - Failed 1st time - Registrar was our choice.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Company - Failed 1st time - Registrar was chosen by our consultant.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Company - Failed 1st time - Did not use a consultant.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Consultant - Have never had a client fail - I choose registrar.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Consultant - Have never had a client fail - I do NOT choose registrar.

    Votes: 5 16.7%
  • Consultant - Have had a client fail - I choose registrar.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Consultant - Have had a client fail - I do NOT choose registrar.

    Votes: 1 3.3%
  • Doesn't apply to me.

    Votes: 7 23.3%

  • Total voters
    30

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration with a Mask on...
Staff member
Admin
#1
I was sitting here reading a promo on a web site where the consultant says "We have an unprecedented 100% success rate with the registrars of their choice." I sat back and thought - Hmmm, unprecedented? Registrar of their choice?

So now it's up to you. What's your EXPERIENCE?

NOTE: This is a BLIND (anonymous) poll. No user name is connected to a poll vote so who voted and for what is not tracked - Only the totals are tracked.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
T

tomvehoski

#2
Marc,

How would you define "failed"?

Failed Def. 1: Multiple major nonconformances, complete (full audit days) re-audit required.

Failed Def. 2: Major nonconformances, follow up audit (1 day) required.

By definition 1 I have never had a failure. By definition 2, one out of about 50.

Tom
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration with a Mask on...
Staff member
Admin
#3
I define 'Failed' as "...the registrar found / assigned a Major..." whether by absence of a system, failure / breakdown of a system or the number of minors found.

I wouldn't consider it a failure per se if you knew about the problem and warned the company and the company thumbed their nose at you. I did have that happen to me a couple of times but it was always caught during the pre-assessment so by the registration audit the company had decided I was right, seeing as the registrar backed me up, and 'fixed' the problem. Maybe I should have put that option in. I remember back around 1994 one company president telling me it was none of ISO's business whether or not he did management review. After the registrar's auditor did the pre-assesment and told the guy it wasn't a choice he was allowed to make if he wanted his company registered, the guy streightened his act up.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration with a Mask on...
Staff member
Admin
#4
Wow! No 'votes' yet from any company which used a consultant! I'm somewhat surprised.
 
B

bobsedon

#5
I can't answer the poll, we have not had an audit yet. We are using a consultant who says he has never had a company fail an audit. It's no wonder! He moves so slow and beats every process to death before he agrees we should consider it implemented and start work on another. :mad: He says he wants everything right so there are no deficiencies. Seams he's just padding his hours. Upper management has called him on it. We'll see how things go from here.

Is it really a bad thing if deficiencies are found during an audit? We are using ISO9000 to improve our processes not because a customer is making us. Part of learning is trying and failing. The consultant may learn our way meets the standard just as well as his.
 
R

Rob Nix

#6
bobsedon,

You make some interesting points, and it goes along with concerns I have had with using consultants for years. If they are paid to help you pass an audit, they will dot every i, cross every t, and strike-through every z just to ensure you have NO NON-CONFORMITIES - that you pass the audit, at whatever cost in dollars and time to the company.

The only successful contract with a consultant is a long term one, where they are paid to make your QMS an effective one in the long run. Other Cove contributors, that are consultants, can explain it from their angle.

If you have a good knowledge of your business system, and a decent understanding of the standard, you may not need your consultant, especially if you don't mind getting 'dinged' a few times on your first audit.
 
#7
Rob Nix said:
bobsedon,

Other Cove contributors, that are consultants, can explain it from their angle.
And so I shall. I too can say that I have 100% pass rate. However, I have also had several companies that have decided not to go through the registration process. I have also had companies that I have fired because they would not take their QMS seriously. Do I have a 100% success rate? No, not even close. But those who wanted to succeed, did.

Many of the companies I’ve worked for did not really need a consultant. I tell each of my clients that they don’t need a consultant. However, sometimes it is less expensive to use someone who knows the ropes to assist the company in getting their QMS off the ground.

I will argue your point that “The only successful contract with a consultant is a long term one”. My goal is for the client to have an effective QMS in the long run, however, I want their QMS to operate without my continual input. I do offer to come back once a year, or so and do an audit, but that is about it. I am rarely around during the registration audit. By then, they should be on their own and their system fully functional. Of course, I’m always available to answer questions.
 
R

Rob Nix

#8
Dave, I condemn all consultants except for the ones reading, or that will ever read, this posting. :biglaugh:

So present company is excepted. Seriously, though, there are many consultants, like yourself, that do an excellent job - and truly care that the company is successful in the future (I have also done consulting off and on over the years). But I have heard of, and been a "side-line witness" to too many consultants that go for OVERKILL, simply to ensure a passing grade (a certificate on the wall). They get paid, and move on, without looking back at the long term damage of an unmanagable system.

I think that might be the case with bobsedon.

Bobsedon,

Perhaps you should have your consultant provide you a list of what he considers the remaining open issues (along with the clause they apparently fail to meet) and go over them with your management team. For each issue, can we explain "our way", can we leave it alone and take our chances, or should we do something about it? Whatever you do, GET CLOSURE. Get your consultant to commit to a specific timeline.
 
B

bobsedon

#9
Thanks, Rob. Our upper management has recently asked for most of what you suggest. I'll make sure the caluse is included.
:thanx:
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
Interesting topic. I don't use consultants, so I can't vote, but I'm very interested in the results. Marc, is there a way that I can see the results? I weasle information and samples of stuff from anywhere I can. As a matter of fact, I found the cove as a result of a google search for "Quality Policy Manual" when we were upgrading to yk2k.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R TL9000 Implementation - Has anyone out there been through TL9000 Implementation? TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 6
J How to keep MDD certificate valid when legal manufacturer has liquidity problem EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Should APQP/PPAP has its own section in a QM? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
G Special 510K possible? Only the packaging has changed Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
Louddogsbark When your 13485:2016 certificate has been pulled ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
lanley liao What shoud i do if our company top management has been changed. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 8
S PSW - Requirements for "off-the shelf" component that has multiply manufacturing locations Off the Shelf Item Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
L GRR for a tolerance that has changed Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
D Partial FAI - AS9102 - One single drawing has 10 part numbers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
BeaBea ISO 9001 Customer Feedback Methods - What has worked for your company? Service Industry Specific Topics 17
S Has anybody done IMS - Management Review Meeting ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 8
M Has anyone has been through an MDR audit? (3/2020) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Has anyone heard of Run at Risk? Manufacturing and Related Processes 15
B ASA Aviation Supply Association - Has anyone heard of ASA? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
B Has anyone done an IEC 60601-1 gap analysis to IEC 60335? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
Z 510(k) usage - Company has 2 physically similar products Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
D Has anyone had sudden challenges from Korea-MFDS? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
Sidney Vianna IAQG News IAQG has a new website - December 2019 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
Richard Regalado ISO 22301:2019 has been published - Nov 2019 Business Continuity & Resiliency Planning (BCRP) 0
S FAIR - If we have not produced a part in over 2 years, but nothing has changed AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
Nicole Desouza Who has to be compliant with REACH Declarations? REACH and RoHS Conversations 11
CycleMike GD&T - Hole pattern - Print (attached) has a single Datum Reference Frame Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
A Would an MRP system that has been in use for over 10 years require validation? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
W Informational VDI 2017 - Medical Grade Plastics - German VDI has published a "Richtlinie" Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
D FDA Biomarker Qualification Program - Has anyone prepared an application? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
U Hand-Held dosing device has no PATIENT - Interpretation of the PATIENT definition IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
L Has anyone heard of the 2 pan system? Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
N Technical File Reviewer has requested more testing to ISO 10993 Other Medical Device Related Standards 10
I Who has had to move from ISO 9001:2015 to ISO 13485 and what were the challenges? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M Informational Health Canada has launched an e-Learning tool to aid in understanding the premarket regulatory requirements for medical devices in Canada Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Has anyone here assessed the latest Abbreviated 510(K) guidance document? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
M Does anyone has a good verification and validation plan template? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Sidney Vianna Informational UTC ASQR Rev.11 has a mistake; certification of distributors to IATF 16949 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
lilybef FDA and Biocompatability Testing - Reviewer has requested implantation testing Other Medical Device Related Standards 11
D Has anyone undergone a BARDA (HHS) audit as part of their grant process? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
Sidney Vianna LinkedIn bug - Anyone has any idea of how to fix this? Posts not showing for me in a Group feed. Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
M FDA News FDA Report - FDA Has Taken Steps to Strengthen The 510(k) Program Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
C Has an amended version of IEC 60601-1-6 TRF been released for use in conjunction with IEC62366-1:2015? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 0
planB ISO 10993-1:2018 has just been published Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
S ISO 13485 Consultant Question - The company has 5 part time employees ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
K Has anyone used QAI for training? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 7
Q MHRA has released a new guidance document related to 'GXP' Data Integrity EU Medical Device Regulations 3
B FDA Philippines has no check or balance outside the health department Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
S Doubts about SPC taken in Machining - Part has +-0.01 Tolerance Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
D Has anyone here had any experience with PQ-FMEA software? FMEA and Control Plans 1
P NPR Metric - What if Customer has relaxed measure? TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 1
D EU Harmonized Standards to which a company has declared compliance EU Medical Device Regulations 13
N Customer Survey Question Has Me Stumped - Compliance with Laws and Regulations Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4
B Records Destroyed - Hurricane Harvey has likely destroyed our Quality Systems Records Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 10
S Has anyone completed IATF 16949 Certification - Share your Audit Experience? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom